now that I rmb. during our CoC semi final game against Pool. Costa was playing similarly like Barnes too? Going in with studs high into Can and Skrtel. In the game, Costa was not red carded too. But after the game, FA reviewed it and gave Costa 3 match ban due to violent conduct.
Can't we used diz to appeal? It's quite similar to Barnes' incident. He went in stud high on several challenge, and wasn't sent off too. We could use the same case as reference. And hand out 3 match ban to Barnes too.
what for to have EPL since FA, ref and media against some teams and bias toward some teams. no matter how strong is chelsea, how to win when unfair treatment against us...
now that I rmb. during our CoC semi final game against Pool. Costa was playing similarly like Barnes too? Going in with studs high into Can and Skrtel. In the game, Costa was not red carded too. But after the game, FA reviewed it and gave Costa 3 match ban due to violent conduct.
Can't we used diz to appeal? It's quite similar to Barnes' incident. He went in stud high on several challenge, and wasn't sent off too. We could use the same case as reference. And hand out 3 match ban to Barnes too.
In costa case, referee dint see the incident, so FA can act after the match In this case, FA claimed referee saw the incident so no action will be take
In costa case, referee dint see the incident, so FA can act after the match In this case, FA claimed referee saw the incident so no action will be take
somehow I feel that in the Liverpool's game, the ref purposely 'did not see' the incident. Just so that Costa can be banned.
In costa case, referee dint see the incident, so FA can act after the match In this case, FA claimed referee saw the incident so no action will be take
FA claimed ref saw,ref said he didnt saw it.so......which one is true?
what i know is FA fakap already with their game.
This post has been edited by lol~: Feb 24 2015, 01:52 PM
now that I rmb. during our CoC semi final game against Pool. Costa was playing similarly like Barnes too? Going in with studs high into Can and Skrtel. In the game, Costa was not red carded too. But after the game, FA reviewed it and gave Costa 3 match ban due to violent conduct.
Can't we used diz to appeal? It's quite similar to Barnes' incident. He went in stud high on several challenge, and wasn't sent off too. We could use the same case as reference. And hand out 3 match ban to Barnes too.
costa was charged with alleged stamping on can and skrtel
annnndddd certain club keep on dissing about chelsea
This post has been edited by SlomoX: Feb 24 2015, 02:17 PM
that Burnley player can gtfo for all I care, I just want Matic to win the appeal. At least he can play in the COC final.
I highly doubt we will win MATIC appeal, i see no ground FA will give it. The red card is for aggressive conduct, not like some wrong call, and FA definitely dont want to promote is OK to retaliate if a player receive bad tackle
Too bad MIKEL was injured, i would prefer him over RAMIRES against SPURS as he is more discipline in defense. We all saw how SPURS beat us earlier in the league, their player like to dribble through the middle, we need the extra man there to cover the CB, i afraid RAMIRES will too busy attacking and left that space open, while FABREGAS arent really good at covering position yet.
Feb 24 2015, 01:19 PM
Quote
really fakap la diz FA. a big joke.
0.0331sec
0.22
6 queries
GZIP Disabled