QUOTE(jtan.pdr @ Dec 18 2018, 11:41 PM)
Thanks for the compliment.Btw Lets reverse our buyers thinking logic a bit.
If those pro-streamer said this IS-3A is meh, as a buyer, would you be interested to buy without rental? For like RM200? or even motivated to get it in Lootboxes?
And recent there is a pro streamer who complains about IS-3A and "how would he fix WoT" if given the chance; (14 Dec 2018), he did propose a similar solution as WG did at premium ammo nerf part,
something like if "prammo damage is reduced to -50%, a lot of superheavies will be massively buffed", "Currently Type 5 heavy is 27% pay to win", makes me kind da think that -27% prammo damage would be logical while maintaining same PEN and same cost, BEFORE WG announced prammo fix.
14 Dec 2018: The video release on youtube
15 Dec 2018: WG announced 2019 solution on prammo fixes + superheavies armor fixes
What a timing huh?
Anyway, having seen too many pro-streamer videos on those OP tanks, somehow I have to make a long post describing my IS-3A experience as a player below average...
Comparison for what I said:
Defender(BAD) vs IS-3A(BAD) frontally in snapshot distance, Defender's thicker armor + bigger alpha allow more room for errors.
Defender(BAD) vs IS-3A(BAD) face-to-face brawling, IS-3A almost 100% wins by average burst damage 390+390+390+390, while losing half of the HP by average
Defender in good hands, can push the line effectively with support. But its damage potential severely limited by its derpy gun and long reload times than IS-3A
IS-3A in good hands, can defend a flank very well with little support, but due to its subpar snapshotting capability, its more like derpy support fire if used offensively. Best rush into face to face brawling if got any chance. Side shotting is very possible even at long range due to shell speed.
Personally I feel they should switch names for each other.
This post has been edited by air: Dec 19 2018, 09:59 AM
Dec 19 2018, 09:58 AM

Quote


















0.1159sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled