Lol guess thats ure world. Cc is now more on of redemption gift points.
Anyway work or study hard/smart n maybe change ure enviroment.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 7 2015, 04:24 PM

From what i have seen in gsync thread.. Dp cables are finicky n require high qc to produce.

Try another dp cable.

another butt hurt emo.
number on my wts thread.

console gaming i guess.

ok so from what i read double precision on the blacks will be faster than the titan x.

so now waiting for display port 1.3. Pretty sure 4k 120hz gsync will be a reality this year.



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 7 2015, 04:49 PM

another person in the ignore list. Keyboard warrior no 32.

err afaik scalers/ monitor calls it adaptive sync. It just a matter of time but there will be definitely a premium segmented market for gaming monitors from now on.

You mean different camp. Always will be different. They way each card renders is different.

Last time benq was the major player and now looks like with the adaptive/gsync.. we are going to see a new segment with a hefty price tag.
I still have a lot of doubts on adaptive sync working as good as gsync. Y cause no company has yet to commit a release date afaik.

More importantly for longevity hope 390x and titan x will have display port 1.3.

Hmm titan x clock to clock with two blacks. Hmm graphic score on 3dmark 11 abt 3-4k difference.
In sli on both is 50 percent difference only as oppose to 100%.

That makes clock to clock difference abt 25% only titan x vs black.

So need three for 4k domination but so many games dont work with 3. Its always been the bane on nvidia sli afr & sfr issue.

5 hrs

Its those min fps u need to see. Anyway expect at rm4-4.5k
390x 4gb 3.5k

Watch the vid dude. Its not gaming performance.
That slide is abt nvlink, hbm etc. So it includes multi gpu scability etc.

Anyway taking 2 instead of three. Will make this setup 2nd rig office rig when pascal comes about.

Disappointed at display port 1.2.

Also it inherited overclocking scaling of maxwell. Not as good as keplers. 20% oc on keplers u get abt that in real world. Maxwell seems to suffer some bottleneck issue which i suspect is between gddr5 n imc with the rop


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 18 2015, 09:02 AM

Nah forget the reading. Jen was talking about deep learning.
There was no talk about game performance although i did take a 30min nap between that n the self driving car thingy.

The slide was abt the digit package n how current limitation is as 4 cards but with nvlink it will be 8.


Watch the launch vid.

Prices of new rams tech all depends on mass order booking. Its expensive because nvidia is not rolling it out.

Also jen mentioned hbm gives 8-9 times density with 4x bandwidth. The issue is having both together.

Lets see how amd handles 8gb hbm.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 18 2015, 09:09 AM

Dude hbm etc might even be scratched in the future.
Ddr4 is immature. Lots of paths.

Currently for sure. Titan x has bandwidth issues to even challenge 290x/295x2 at 4k. 390x from ground up is targeting 4k. I see a smackdown on titan at 4k. But wce 8gb edition?? Heat issue??.

Meaning at 4k texture streaming theres a bottleneck n having that 12gb vram is gonna be useless. See how 1440p to 4k vs 980. The margin shrinks sometimes alot. Vs 290x2 is way worse

Same issue as having a 960 with 8gb.

If u ask me. Titan x is a 1440p single card that does ok at 4k. 390x if its true is the real 4k card.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 18 2015, 09:17 AM

Dont see titan x as 4k gpu. If it was jen would have been proud to announce it. He knows theres a bandwidth issue with maxwell on texture streaming. They slapped on thr 12gb just to keep the 999 price tag. Its a useless amount since the texture streaming seems to overwhelm the bandwidth. From what i saw at the 4k.

Infact if u look at the whole launch is about the middleware nvidia is releasing for deep thinking.

Its just a bigger maxwell. Nothing new like og titan.

Amd is totally gunning at 4k. I have to side with the red camp. Expecting a nvidia smackdown derby.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 18 2015, 11:11 AM

Err no. Dude ure not displaying 4gb of data per sec.

Alot of it is cached on ram.

Expect titan x at 4.2-4.5k rsp.

This is gonna be a short two months epeen.

Everything known shows amd fix their biggest flaw ..tessalation with 390x n is ready for a smackdown. Those cards not cheap also as wce 390x higher clocked version 4gb at 3.5k. 8 gb near 4k



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Mar 18 2015, 05:08 PM

Y would graphic engineers (btw what does graphic engineers do.. Game engineers, design engineers, etc.. knew a lot of ppl in game design n this is a first time hearing this designation. I am assuming there are graphic designers) need double precision.

So what work do they do they need double precision. They need fp32 afaik

I think 390 .. Not the x version is gonna be one hella of card.

Hope amd redo their whole drivers devision. Just copy nvidia to a similar platform ftw.

Nonsense on dp use. I am no expert on it n neither are u.
But pretty sure that not what dp is used for. Pretty sure on that.

All the guys who use dp are for science. Game implemenation would just be map size afaik.

Calling for empire23
Bro does dp help on what he says??