QUOTE(kianwee @ Feb 24 2015, 02:35 PM)
wow.. it thought it would be around rm3500 Official Fujifilm X-Series Premium Cameras V4, Lenses Cashback Promo: goo.gl/g9tDwk
Official Fujifilm X-Series Premium Cameras V4, Lenses Cashback Promo: goo.gl/g9tDwk
|
|
Feb 24 2015, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 2 2015, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE("admin" @ Mar 2 2015, 03:33 PM) 16-55 for versatility yes.no need to change lens. less hassle. cons, not really suitable for low light, big (77mm filter size) , no OIS xf 56.well people are buying it just to use it at f1.2 but less versatility and not really suitable indoor |
|
|
Mar 7 2015, 08:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(kalakatu @ Mar 7 2015, 07:53 PM) guys, need some advices. Hmm for me would be better if u go for the tcl.much cheaper and no need to own 2 different bodyi own an X100S and i use it to shoot for almost every kind of photo. and 1 of my fav is portrait. the problem is, shooting a close up portrait will make the photo looks distorted since the lens is not tele enough (23mm equiv to 35mm in FF). so, say i want the same perspective as 50mm in fullframe, should i buy the TCL-X100? or its better to buy another camera with 35mm/50mm lens? example like X-E1 with 35mm F1.4? |
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 12:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Sawamura @ Apr 14 2015, 11:55 AM) how u guys u manual lenses like samyang.. i'd go for xf 23mmi used one before.. in camera looks all damn nice.. looks in PC and print only know focus was all over the place.. BTW, im considering to get myself one prime lens.. Since XT1 is crop.. any 23mm lens is equiv to 35mm right? and 35mm is equiv to 50mm ? still cant decide to pick 23mm or 35mm.. hope to get one for walkabout, street and landscape (when intended) photograhy This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 15 2015, 12:59 AM |
|
|
Apr 15 2015, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(gavingoh @ Apr 15 2015, 04:29 PM) USD1150.in RM is RM4200..local unit approximately would be RM3500 http://www.fujirumors.com/xf-16mm-f1-4-wr-...-digicame-info/ better take xf 14mm..better value + wider This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 15 2015, 11:41 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 12:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Apr 28 2015, 11:38 AM) nice shot btw just gotten my samyang 12mm last week, and initial impression -pretty sharp ,slightly sharper than xf 18mm.but not up to xf 35 and xf 56 standard -vignetting quite prominent but easily corrected during PP -sharpness at f2 is good -distortion isnt too bad.could be corrected easily some sample shot ,just edit the Fill Light,Contrast,Highlight and Shadow.no alteration in sharpness » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by kernel123: Apr 29 2015, 01:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 08:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 30 2015, 06:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
May 6 2015, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
xf 56mm
![]() ![]() This post has been edited by kernel123: May 6 2015, 08:14 PM |
|
|
May 7 2015, 08:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
x-t10 confirmed image
http://www.fujirumors.com/leaked-see-the-f...fujifilm-x-t10/ ![]() am i the only one who thinks it is kinda ugly ? This post has been edited by kernel123: May 7 2015, 08:10 PM |
|
|
May 11 2015, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
hmm.this really makes me wanna upgrade to x-t1 .really poisonous liao
|
|
|
May 11 2015, 11:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
May 18 2015, 02:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ May 18 2015, 02:10 PM) http://www.fujirumors.com/first-look-fujif...90mmf2-r-lm-wr/ Finally Seems that XF90mm can be a very good portrait lens. Btw how i wish fuji could make the aperture at f1.6 or f1.8 So that could match the bokeh of canon 135mm f2..a perfect potrait lens IMO Btw the only thing that better than xf 56mm is compression. And the bokeh seems to be better |
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2015, 03:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
May 18 2015, 05:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ May 18 2015, 04:11 PM) Both are great lens for portrait. How good If i have the chance to try them out but they're too expensive for me. No need to get it if u r not potrait shooter Wait a minute. U can get to test all Fuji latest gear prior to their release Btw it's impressive how the bokeh difference between xf90 @ f2 and xf 56 @f1.2. The former is far superior.so i might conclude the 90mm has better bokeh https://ivanjoshualoh.wordpress.com/2015/05...t-you-mr-bokeh/ Never though that longer focal length could produce better bokeh at smaller aperture This post has been edited by kernel123: May 18 2015, 05:07 PM |
|
|
May 18 2015, 10:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(seather @ May 18 2015, 10:02 PM) The camera store also got new video what. Just that they didnt emphasize on the new AF system. Maybe not gud enuf? I would like to see the low light AF performance. Also when shooting sports |
|
|
May 20 2015, 07:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
May 27 2015, 05:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
May 28 2015, 12:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(jeffreyp @ May 27 2015, 09:03 PM) this one include gst ,rm3499 http://www.mudah.my/Brand+new+fujifilm+x+t...ck-35800654.htm QUOTE(darimoroslan @ May 28 2015, 12:27 AM) Maybe this thread can help you. https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1836505 why not x-t10 ? do u need that faster fps and weather sealing? I didn't use filter. Just a newbie with X-M1, trying to learn the power of mirrorless camera. Guess I've made a right choice, choosing Fujifilm for my first camera. Now I'm searching for X-T1. If anyone would like to let go their X-T1, please pm me. Tq. This post has been edited by kernel123: May 28 2015, 12:42 AM |
|
|
May 31 2015, 08:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(DarkSaviour @ May 30 2015, 06:01 PM) hmm now my eyes aim on 10-24mm or 16mm for travel... having with me the xc 16-50mm, during my trip to kashmir almost 95% of my shot were at 16mmstill can't make up my mind... I'm already have 50-140 so 90 can wait so IMO 16mm could be versatile, for landscape and also for potrait with that f1.4,quite shallow DoF |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0496sec
0.56
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 03:04 AM |