the x-t10 price is at RRP .

i do believe that mr oss price would be cheaper

maybe around rm2800

but im assuming xf 23mm is much sharper than xf 18mm.

and not that wide

any sample for 16mm 1.4 ?

the price difference between x-t1 and xt10 is around rm600-700

for me i'd get x-t1 as better build quality and better grip.

xt1 for rm3500



http://m.mudah.my/view?q=x-t1&ca=9_1_s&e=0...&ad_id=36663213

u bought from whom? dun forget to post the sample picture. lets poison us more

what lens did u buy from him?

if u wanna jumpship,why not? x-t10 is good alternative to xt1 ,without pro spec ( lower fps,no weathersealing)

This post has been edited by kernel123: Jun 23 2015, 10:09 PM

what rebate is it? is it PWP?

oh. ok2.i got it. because she bought only 1 lens.. so i thought that it wasnt pwp.maybe she shared with another person

all the lens? wow. cant imagine xf 35 with initial price at rm1.6k and xf 23mm at 2.3k shoot up to rm3k

just because RM depreciation

this! better build quality and faster frame rate. i'd go for x-t1 anytime

xf 23mm.if u already have x100t then complement it with xf 56mm


wow.poisonous

btw i'd to agree that this lens perfect for documentary shooting as compared to xf 23mm.u can include other surrounding as it's wide enough.combined with f1.4 it could create that 3D look with shallow Dof

this review can prove that


http://thedigitaltrekker.com/2015/04/views...f-16mm-f1-4-wr/

but the pricee

This post has been edited by kernel123: Jun 28 2015, 01:36 AM

congrats

yeah.. it is normal.i think that is a drawback of sharp lens. it is so sharp that renders bokeh sharply too

the bokeh can be quite busy with foliage background

f1.2 awesomeness






This post has been edited by kernel123: Jun 29 2015, 01:56 AM

nope. normal one. not gonna waste rm2k on the same lens with additonal filter

niceee

but it would better if got moving cloud.

why not just buy the x100t?

I'm thinking of getting one but no articulating LCD and small aperture prevent me from getting such camera

as xf 56 user for a year,and after saw xf 90mm sample images on flicks,I'd say get 56 if u are going to use it indoor and outdoor (potraiture,landscape)

get 90 if u are shooting lots of potrait outdoor or u are shooting in studio ..because 90 will be very tight if to be used indoor

but for sure the bokeh and compression will be better using 90mm but composing image will be harder



haha kinda of.had been thinking of switching to fix lens system but not really sure if f2 is good enough in low light

do u prefer it to xf 23mm ?

This post has been edited by kernel123: Aug 3 2015, 07:31 PM

wireless and buttons doesn't really a differentiating factor between x100t vs x100s

but Face Detection and Eye detection ..it is crucial as shooting group of people at f2 it kinda hard to get all in focus at f2 as u need to switch focus point .quite cumbersome.for me laa

sadly tho fuji has stopped all future firmware update for x100s as this will kill x100t sale ..

This post has been edited by kernel123: Aug 3 2015, 07:37 PM

welcome

i dunno.maybe xf 56 more in demand.just like xf 23mm.initially during release it was at rm2250 and now it is priced at rm2750


f1.2 would be useful in low light situation as compared to bokeh quality .90mm got superior bokeh in my opinion

u can contact mr oss in garage sale for better price