QUOTE(eluna @ Dec 29 2014, 03:13 AM)
for me i'd go for 10-24.already cover 4 prime focal length available for fuji : samyang 12mm,fuji 14,18,23mm Official Fujifilm X-Series Premium Cameras V4, Lenses Cashback Promo: goo.gl/g9tDwk
Official Fujifilm X-Series Premium Cameras V4, Lenses Cashback Promo: goo.gl/g9tDwk
|
|
Dec 29 2014, 09:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(eluna @ Dec 29 2014, 03:13 AM) for me i'd go for 10-24.already cover 4 prime focal length available for fuji : samyang 12mm,fuji 14,18,23mm |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2015, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2015, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(gavingoh @ Jan 5 2015, 04:36 PM) Haha, do you understand mandarin? May try refer here http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=246&t=4202127 or http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=246&t=4200723 The size bit huge and heavy compare other xf AF speed, accurate, and image quality was great, but bokeh some stiff can found. https://www.simonrevill.com/portraits-kelli...40mm-f2-8-lens/ and as compared to nikon 70-200mm f4 ,its equivalance,the bokeh is much better IMO https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-70-200mm-f4g-vr |
|
|
Jan 6 2015, 01:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(s7ran9er @ Jan 6 2015, 12:50 PM) yeah, shots by ricopress. Amazing. the difference is almost negligible IMOnow, APD vs the normal 56mm. RP015686 – APD by ricopress, on Flickr RP015681 by ricopress, on Flickrmore comparison on the flickr set. i dont either the extra usd500 for the APD worth it or not.around rm1800 |
|
|
Jan 6 2015, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
xf 16-55mm f2.8 announced!
http://www.fujirumors.com/first-look-fujin...mmf2-8-r-lm-wr/ priced at usd1200..guess the official price in MY will be around rm3.3k to rm3.5k. still within my expextation.no OIS. i guess i will be sticking to the faster prime then. |
|
|
Jan 15 2015, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(kLvru @ Jan 14 2015, 11:37 PM) Just got the X-T1 and 23 1.4 from Mr.Oss few days ago, and loved it. as far as i know,Photo Ninja has the best rendering Fuji RAW,to avoid water color effectDid some playing around with it and my gf's X-E2. I wasn't particularly happy with the Jpeg SOOC sharpness, so went and shot RAW + JPEG to do some comparison. I know jpeg are compressed and lossy etc, but wasn't expecting that much difference in sharpness between them. Am I expecting too much from fuji's jpeg? Tried with both 23 1.4 at wide open and 10-24 at f 7.1. I'm trying to minimize raw since I really like how fuji process their jpegs. Oh and at 50-100% zoom, they were a bit like oil painting/watercolor effect, especially on green foliage. The effects were greater in the X-E2 than X-T1 Anyone had similar experience? My in camera settings were NR: -2 Sharpening: -2 Colour: +1 DR: 400 shot in full manual as i read from here : https://photographylife.com/reviews/fuji-x-t1/3 and Lightroom isnt that good rendering fuji RAW file |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2015, 01:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 21 2015, 01:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2015, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
should upgrade my x-e1 to x-t1 ? Especially before GST?
or should i wait for x-t1? having touch screen and 15 cross type AF really my wants in xt2 |
|
|
Jan 27 2015, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(jeffreyp @ Jan 27 2015, 12:28 PM) today lazada doing a crazy sales wow.the x-t1 with xf 56 all item have extra 8.88% discount... XT1 + 56mm = RM6026 ...local warranty http://www.lazada.com.my/fujifilm/?3l-trading# voucher code : STORE8hdy Sorry, Maybank card...10% on everything after 10% discount. 5895 -xt1 with 56mm 5040 -xt1 with 18-135mm 4860 -xt1 with 35mm 4347 -xt1 with kit 18-55mm 3960 -xt1 graphic 3357 -xt1 3420 -x100t after minus the 56 at Garage Sale price (rm2880) the xt1 body would be rm3146.so cheap |
|
|
Jan 27 2015, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2015, 10:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(jeffreyp @ Jan 27 2015, 09:05 PM) It will have a diff becoz studio photography I finally can see, xm1 is totally black when taking with flash.. No function to disable preview... hmm..this might trigger me to get x-t1 as im expecting xt1 to drop to below 3k once xt2/xpro2 released .hahaI plan to sell xm1 if xt1 reach my hand... Haha 35mm is a very good lens,indoor potrait will be sweet i have check market price, like xe2 price didnt drop much(maybe 100-200) since it launch....not like sony which drop every month...sweat fuji seems have a steady price... |
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 11:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2015, 10:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 2 2015, 09:58 PM) I agree with you since mirrorless is supposed to be light. xf 56mm already good enough Adding the 16-55 makes the camera as heavy as semi pro dslr. XF56 APD is waiting for you then . That creamy bokeh no need to spend extra around rm1600 just for the slight creamier bokeh http://www.fujirumors.com/xf-56mm-apd-vs-xf-56mm/ |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 01:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(ongdennis @ Feb 3 2015, 11:03 AM) so big... i think the lens suits better for potrait photographer the lens kinda negate the purpose of using mirrorless cam : being light and portable im curious how does it compares to other mirrorless 24-70 equivalent lens : samsung 16-50,olympus 12-40mm, (in term of size) but it does lighter than dslr equivalent of 24-70.1.1kg vs 1.43g on d7100 with nikon 17-50mm 2.8 mounted yet the difference quite negligible as i read from here https://ivanjoshualoh.wordpress.com/2015/01...new-prime-zoom/ This post has been edited by kernel123: Feb 3 2015, 01:19 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(Xiia0Ban @ Feb 3 2015, 01:25 PM) I'm impressed with the IQ of 16-55. plus the weight sommore .definitely wont be holding it steadily in low light for jerky hand like me.for sure need OIS But due to lack of OIS, I don't think it suits me since my hand is not that steady sometimes. Wide aperture prime will definitely win in low light compared to 16-55. as it's only f2.8 how i wish Fuji would be as innovative as Samsung like the samsung 16-50mm f2-2.8 with OIS .shoud've been perfect to me |
|
|
Feb 4 2015, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(fujkenasai @ Feb 4 2015, 03:29 PM) anyone having problems with fuji x-100s focusing sometimes its abit slow but still quite ok compared to 100, anyone played with the x-100t? the x100t is faster than x100s.but not that significant (in low light) the lx100 so fast. how i wish fujfilm AF as good as Panasonic particularly in low light |
|
|
Feb 10 2015, 09:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Feb 10 2015, 08:40 PM) Some shots I took during a ROM session last weekend for my friend 85mm is a perfect focal length for wedding i guess All taken with the 56mm F1.2 lens - very simple lens to use haha. Aperture just set to 1.2, and control the DOF by foot ROM: Jak ♥ Er Qi 1 by PF T.J., on Flickr ROM: Jak ♥ Er Qi 2 by PF T.J., on Flickr ROM: Jak ♥ Er Qi 4 by PF T.J., on Flickr» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Congrats to the newly-wed Maybe its because of the crowdedness, the Fujifilm performed better than my Nikon@24-70mm F2.8 that day =.= Not enough bokeh I suppose I was very doubtful that I won't use the 56mm F1.2 lens much and wanted to swap with a 23mm F1.4, but I guess I don't wanna do that anymore, the lens is simply awesome! btw is it x-t1 capable of professional use? This post has been edited by kernel123: Feb 10 2015, 09:54 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2015, 12:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,746 posts Joined: Feb 2011 |
QUOTE(tehoice @ Feb 19 2015, 11:43 PM) i thought it was considered okay, kinda cheap already. how much is the discount if i buy using cimb? but if you have a little more patience, maybe you can find it on lazada when they have storewide + maybank/cimb/mastercard sales. then would be cheaper than this price. but if you need it, i thought it was okay. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0505sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 01:22 AM |