Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

1090 Pages « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mortgage Loan Package Inquiries, (Strictly NO Promotion Allowed)

views
     
wuwah
post Dec 31 2014, 12:14 AM

ai ai ai~
******
Senior Member
1,153 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Malaysia, Perlis



QUOTE(wild_card_my @ Dec 30 2014, 09:45 PM)
1. No, there would not be any problem with selling the house under the market value.

2. No problems whatsoever. The rule is that the first 2 properties can be bought at 100 or 90% margin of financing (MOF), while the 3rd and beyond residential property loan will be capped at 70% MOF.

I have helped many youngsters get their 100% loan schemes, no issue as long as you qualify

3. I don't represent MBSB so I cant speak for them. However, do note that buying a house requires paying the house for 100% of the selling price, plus about 2% loan agreement legal fees and 2% SPA legal fees. With the 100% loan that I do, it covers the 100% of the selling price, not the 2% + 2% legal fees that you need to pay as well.

The interest rates for 100% loans are the same as other normal loans, I am not sure about MBSB though. I heard their rates are higher than normal.
*
Thanks a lot for your answer. yeah.. I saw the rate is high compared to others. Just because they offered 105% loan that makes me considered their loan compared to others. here's the pdf,
http://mbsb.com.my/misc/promo_rumah_pertama.pdf

I saw your phone no back then in this thread, would you mind if later if I got enquiry or need your help in this trade, I call you for help? or might ask you to arrange for us?

QUOTE(661188 @ Dec 31 2014, 12:09 AM)
Bro,
For 1 lhdn may still charge stamp duty at market value if they deem undersold.
*
Noted. Thanks for the info notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by wuwah: Dec 31 2014, 12:16 AM
jan_sc_leong
post Dec 31 2014, 12:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
95 posts

Joined: May 2014
QUOTE(wild_card_my @ Dec 30 2014, 09:45 PM)
1. No, there would not be any problem with selling the house under the market value.

2. No problems whatsoever. The rule is that the first 2 properties can be bought at 100 or 90% margin of financing (MOF), while the 3rd and beyond residential property loan will be capped at 70% MOF.

I have helped many youngsters get their 100% loan schemes, no issue as long as you qualify

3. I don't represent MBSB so I cant speak for them. However, do note that buying a house requires paying the house for 100% of the selling price, plus about 2% loan agreement legal fees and 2% SPA legal fees. With the 100% loan that I do, it covers the 100% of the selling price, not the 2% + 2% legal fees that you need to pay as well.

The interest rates for 100% loans are the same as other normal loans, I am not sure about MBSB though. I heard their rates are higher than normal.
*
What if the 2nd property already finished pay off all the loan amount and buying 3rd property also subject to 70% MOF?
wild_card_my
post Dec 31 2014, 01:01 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,562 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur

QUOTE(mhyug @ Dec 30 2014, 10:53 PM)
hi wild card, can you shed some advice on the insurance for housing loans.

some acronym like MRTA/MLTA/MDTA and many more since ive seen different bank seems to have a different name. correct me if im wrong this is all insurance regarding your loan, and on what features do they differ?

also per say we do take 1 for our loan, how much do we incur to the loan were borrowing, is it monthly or one shot? and last but not least do we pay another set of fees to the insurance company?
*
There are 2 types of insurances that you can get to cover your mortgage:

a) MRTA
b) Everything ELSE (usually referred to as MLTA, MRTT, whatever)

THE MRTA
-Sold by the banks
-Has to be paid in lump sum, thus
-Can be financed into the loan
-Doing so would increase your loan amount on to of your property loan, thus increasing your monthly repayment
-Coverage is based on reducing balance, usually it tries to track the loan outstanding for a given tenure
-Attached to that particular loan you are applying to, if you refinance, early settle, or sell the house, the MRTA would cease to exist
-Usually does not cover Critical Illness, and only sometimes cover Total Permanent Disability

THE MLTA (or whatever)
-Are simply term or life insurance
-can be paid monthly, or as per my recommendation, on a yearly basis
-cannot be finance into the loan in general (some banks do allow them to though, like OCBC)
-Of course, if you finance it into the loan it would increase your monthly repayment as well
-I do recommend that you do not include it into the loan to avoid paying interest on the borrowings, just pay as you go yearly
-Coverage is level throughout your life. It will not reduce, nor increase. But you can adjust it if you want to
-Attached to you. Hey, it is a life insurance! It follows you everywhere regardless of your commitments/liabilities (like your mortgages and other loans)
-As such it will continue to exist even if you refinance/settle/sell your house
-Flexible. Covers TPD as default and CI if you choose so

Here are some illustration:

user posted image
user posted image


QUOTE(661188 @ Dec 31 2014, 12:09 AM)
Bro,
For 1 lhdn may still charge stamp duty at market value if they deem undersold.
*
Yes they may, because LHDN has all the records of all previously transacted prices of the properties in any given area - since they are ones charging the stamp duties on the SPA agreements.

But from my experience, differences of just 10-20% of the selling price to the open market value has never triggered any inquiries from the LHDN. Also do note that during the verbal valuation, the valuers are happy to green light an asking price below the open market value, and you can use the valuation report as evidence that the market value of that particular property is as stated on the valuation report and the SPA.

So the idea is that the SPA has to have a matching valuation as per the report then and there wouldn't be any issue.

You gave a good input on the discussion though, and that is highly appreciated. I simply didn't think it would be an issue for this particular client though.

QUOTE(jan_sc_leong @ Dec 31 2014, 12:19 AM)
What if the 2nd property already finished pay off all the loan amount and buying 3rd property also subject to 70% MOF?
*
Nope, if you have settled your 2nd property, the record of that loan would be removed from your CCRIS, and the bank can give your 3rd housing loan a 90% MOF.

And this unencumbered (without any loans) property can be refinanced regardless of any recent BNM rules:

a. The calculation for the approval as well as the installment to be at the maximum of 35 years, as opposed to 10 years for encumbered properties
b. Not subject to 3rd property-70% MOF rules whatsoever; even if you already have 2 housing loans, and you want to refinance this unencumbered property, you would be allowed to finance it for up to 90% of the market value (so you can get more cash)

This post has been edited by wild_card_my: Dec 31 2014, 01:04 AM
mhyug
post Dec 31 2014, 02:56 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,551 posts

Joined: May 2009
huaa thanks for the explanation bro.
Halfhearted04
post Jan 2 2015, 02:50 PM

Sloth
******
Senior Member
1,941 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
would like to know. if i can have roughly 1.5k available for monthly home loan.

what price range of property i can look for ? below 200k ?
kb9
post Jan 3 2015, 12:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Dec 2012
QUOTE(wild_card_my @ Dec 31 2014, 01:01 AM)
There are 2 types of insurances that you can get to cover your mortgage:

a) MRTA
b) Everything ELSE (usually referred to as MLTA, MRTT, whatever)

THE MRTA
-Sold by the banks
-Has to be paid in lump sum, thus
-Can be financed into the loan
-Doing so would increase your loan amount on to of your property loan, thus increasing your monthly repayment
-Coverage is based on reducing balance, usually it tries to track the loan outstanding for a given tenure
-Attached to that particular loan you are applying to, if you refinance, early settle, or sell the house, the MRTA would cease to exist
-Usually does not cover Critical Illness, and only sometimes cover Total Permanent Disability

THE MLTA (or whatever)
-Are simply term or life insurance
-can be paid monthly, or as per my recommendation, on a yearly basis
-cannot be finance into the loan in general (some banks do allow them to though, like OCBC)
-Of course, if you finance it into the loan it would increase your monthly repayment as well
-I do recommend that you do not include it into the loan to avoid paying interest on the borrowings, just pay as you go yearly
-Coverage is level throughout your life. It will not reduce, nor increase. But you can adjust it if you want to
-Attached to you. Hey, it is a life insurance! It follows you everywhere regardless of your commitments/liabilities (like your mortgages and other loans)
-As such it will continue to exist even if you refinance/settle/sell your house
-Flexible. Covers TPD as default and CI if you choose so

Here are some illustration:

user posted image
user posted image
Yes they may, because LHDN has all the records of all previously transacted prices of the properties in any given area - since they are ones charging the stamp duties on the SPA agreements.

But from my experience, differences of just 10-20% of the selling price to the open market value has never triggered any inquiries from the LHDN. Also do note that during the verbal valuation, the valuers are happy to green light an asking price below the open market value, and you can use the valuation report as evidence that the market value of that particular property is as stated on the valuation report and the SPA.

So the idea is that the SPA has to have a matching valuation as per the report then and there wouldn't be any issue.

You gave a good input on the discussion though, and that is highly appreciated. I simply didn't think it would be an issue for this particular client though.
Nope, if you have settled your 2nd property, the record of that loan would be removed from your CCRIS, and the bank can give your 3rd housing loan a 90% MOF.

And this unencumbered (without any loans) property can be refinanced regardless of any recent BNM rules:

a. The calculation for the approval as well as the installment to be at the maximum of 35 years, as opposed to 10 years for encumbered properties
b. Not subject to 3rd property-70% MOF rules whatsoever; even if you already have 2 housing loans, and you want to refinance this unencumbered property, you would be allowed to finance it for up to 90% of the market value (so you can get more cash)
*
Bro are you sure that refinancing of fully paid property is not subjected to LTV 70%?

I thought it is considered as a new application so the same restriction applies, no?
spydermind
post Jan 4 2015, 09:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,166 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
Refinance doesn't increase the number of loan , so I don't think it applies to LTV 70%
jocall123
post Jan 4 2015, 05:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


@wild_card_my, hi there I have a question. I am currently engaged to Alliance Islamic Loan for the 5th year and the details as below.

Initial loan amount : RM 301k
Interest rate : first 12 mths : 3.25%
Thereafter : BLR -2.05%
Tenure : 30 years
Current payment : RM 1.5k

I am thinking of refinancing my condo to payoff my car loan so that I can have lesser monthly commitment. I also understand that this will extend the loan tenure. Do you think it is advisable or just a stupid idea?

My current income : RM 5350 ( fix with allowance )
Car loan : 52k
Interest : 2.7%

Pls advice. Thanks


Aik_FEI
post Jan 5 2015, 08:28 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


QUOTE(Halfhearted04 @ Jan 2 2015, 02:50 PM)
would like to know. if i can have roughly 1.5k available for monthly home loan.

what price range of property i can look for ? below 200k ?
*
If you area saying monthly installment RM1500

Property range around RM 350-300K
Aik_FEI
post Jan 5 2015, 08:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


QUOTE(kb9 @ Jan 3 2015, 12:23 PM)
Bro are you sure that refinancing of fully paid property is not subjected to LTV 70%?

I thought it is considered as a new application so the same restriction applies, no?
*
Hi, Mr KB9

If you have 2 properties on hand, refinance any one of it will still consider 2nd house 90% Refinance.

MOF 70% will only be counted if you have 3 residential properties on hand !

If you Refinance UNENCUMBERED property, your DSR calculation will be much lesser for certain bank, lower commitment DSR for your loan to pass through.

It's all under BNM rules and regulation, @wild_card_my is correct.
Aik_FEI
post Jan 5 2015, 08:33 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


QUOTE(spydermind @ Jan 4 2015, 09:47 AM)
Refinance doesn't increase the number of loan ,  so I don't think it applies to LTV 70%
*
Refinance still falls onto the Refinanced Properties loan, in banks record to be clear. =)

and you are right !
Aik_FEI
post Jan 5 2015, 08:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


QUOTE(jocall123 @ Jan 4 2015, 05:34 PM)
@wild_card_my, hi there I have a question. I am currently engaged to Alliance Islamic Loan for the 5th year and the details as below.

Initial loan amount : RM 301k
Interest rate : first 12 mths : 3.25%
                    Thereafter : BLR -2.05%
Tenure : 30 years
Current payment : RM 1.5k

I am thinking of refinancing my condo to payoff my car loan so that I can have lesser monthly commitment. I also understand that this will extend the loan tenure. Do you think it is advisable or just a stupid idea?

My current income : RM 5350 ( fix with allowance )
Car loan : 52k
Interest : 2.7%

Pls advice. Thanks
*
Hi jocall123, let me give you my suggestion

Refinance cash out to pay off car loan is not a wise move. Let me explain succintly.

Your car loan is calculated based on flat rate, meaning to say the moment you purchase your car, the interest has already been calculated based on your purchased price, hence your installment will bore the interest from the beginning and paying off car loan earlier doesn't help you to save a cent of car loan interest.

I advise that you refinance cash out and park the cash in better investment, such as ASB( if you are muslim ), pay off credit card or personal loan. Or as your personal contingencies.

Hope my answer do shone some light to you inquiries =)
cfa28
post Jan 5 2015, 09:01 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,829 posts

Joined: Jan 2012


QUOTE(Aik_FEI @ Jan 5 2015, 08:40 AM)
Hi jocall123, let me give you my suggestion

Refinance cash out to pay off car loan is not a wise move. Let me explain succintly.

Your car loan is calculated based on flat rate, meaning to say the moment you purchase your car, the interest has already been calculated based on your purchased price, hence your installment will bore the interest from the beginning and paying off car loan earlier doesn't help you to save a cent of car loan interest.

I advise that you refinance cash out and park the cash in better investment, such as ASB( if you are muslim ), pay off credit card or personal loan. Or as your personal contingencies.

Hope my answer do shone some light to you inquiries =)
*
I have to disagree on the interest savings part.

No doubt that

1) Interest on Car Loan is fixed in nature
2) Interest in higher upfront - due to Rule 78 Calculations

but you will still get some interest saving as you will not be charged interest from the day you settled your Loan until the original expiry date of the Car Loan. You still save but much less.

Try this link for savings on Car Loan

http://autoworld.com.my/v2/tools/loan_settlement.asp

In the end of the day, its to to with your Cash Flow. Cos if you Refinance, the repayment is stretched over a longer period


Jasoncat
post Jan 5 2015, 09:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,913 posts

Joined: Jun 2014
QUOTE(Aik_FEI @ Jan 5 2015, 08:32 AM)
Hi, Mr KB9

If you have 2 properties on hand, refinance any one of it will still consider 2nd house 90% Refinance.

MOF 70% will only be counted if you have 3 residential properties on hand !

you Refinance UNENCUMBERED property, your DSR calculation will be much lesser for certain bank, lower commitment DSR for your loan to pass through.

It's all under BNM rules and regulation, @wild_card_my is correct.
*
I don't think that's correct. An unencumbered property means no loan is attached to it. Refinance it means a new loan is created, so it in fact weaken the DSR (but whether that new DSR is still healthy or not is diff story).
jocall123
post Jan 5 2015, 09:25 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(cfa28 @ Jan 5 2015, 09:01 AM)
I have to disagree on the interest savings part.

No doubt that

1) Interest on Car Loan is fixed in nature
2) Interest in higher upfront - due to Rule 78 Calculations

but you will still get some interest saving as you will not be charged interest from the day you settled your Loan until the original expiry date of the Car Loan. You still save but much less.

Try this link for savings on Car Loan

http://autoworld.com.my/v2/tools/loan_settlement.asp

In the end of the day, its to to with your Cash Flow. Cos if you Refinance, the repayment is stretched over a longer period
*
Actually my car is still new, I just got it 6 months ago, using the calculator link, I got rebate of about 8k. I m blur with all these finance thingy actually -.-!! I only think that if I refinance my monthly commitment will drop from RM 2200 to lesser.

Anyway if paying off car is out of the picture, would it be advisable to refinance anyway based on the current BR rate and my current interest rate with the bank? Just let's say I wish to have some cash in hand.


Aik_FEI
post Jan 5 2015, 09:46 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


QUOTE(Jasoncat @ Jan 5 2015, 09:22 AM)
I don't think that's correct. An unencumbered property means no loan is attached to it.  Refinance it means a new loan is created, so it in fact weaken the DSR (but whether that new DSR is still healthy or not is diff story).
*
Actually is like this, lets say you refinance a property.

Property price Rm500,000
O/S Price Rm60,000

RM500,000 X90% =RM450,000

RM450,000-RM60,000 = RM390,000

you can cash out RM 390,000

hence, Refinance to a new bank, DSR Calculation


encumbered Property
O/S loan =RM60,000 (normal BLR-2.4 / 35 YEARS max)
RM282/month

Term loan =RM390,000 (normal BLR-2.4 /10 years max )
RM4032/month

TOTAL Back End DSR = RM 4314


Refinance an unencumbered property.

Property Price RM500,000
RM500,000 X90% =RM450,000

You can cash out RM450,000

Unencumbered Property



Term loan =RM450,000 (normal BLR-2.4 /35 years max )

Rm2115/month

Total Back End DSR = RM2115

BE DSR RM4314 (encumebred) compare to BE DSR RM2115 (unencumbered)

Unencumbered Property approval for income base isn't it lower ?


That's why it's lower for Back end DSR calculation on the unencumbered property, easier loan approval for limited income.

This calculation is based on certain bank, not all bank holds similar calculation.

This post has been edited by Aik_FEI: Jan 5 2015, 05:21 PM
Jasoncat
post Jan 5 2015, 02:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,913 posts

Joined: Jun 2014
QUOTE(Aik_FEI @ Jan 5 2015, 09:46 AM)
Actually is like this, lets say you refinance an unencumbered property.

Property price Rm500,000
O/S Price Rm60,000

RM500,000 X90% - Rm60,000 = RM390,000

you can cash out RM 390,000

hence, Refinance to a new bank with DSR  calculation
encumbered Property
O/S loan    =RM60,000    (normal BLR-2.xx / 35 YEARS max)
Term loan  =RM390,000   (normal BLR-2.xx /10 years max )

Unencumbered Property
O/S loan    =RM60,000    (normal BLR-2.xx / 35 YEARS max)
Term loan  =RM390,000   (normal BLR-2.xx /35 years max )

Thats why it's lower for DSR calculation on the unencumbered property.

This calculation is based on certain bank, not all bank holds similar calculation.
*
I'm actually quite confused. If I interpret you correctly, you are saying that using one unencumbered property to borrow and redeem another encumbered property with a loan outstanding of RM60k (but why RM60k - do I miss out sth from previous posts?). Fine, there will only be one loan then. But this should not be generalised that the DSR will be lower by refinancing as there are too many assumptions involved - the value of the unencumbered property, the outstanding of the existing loan, the monthly instalments of the new and existing loan (to be repaid) etc. Further, fees (legal, loan documentation and stamp duty) will be incurred, so this has to be factored in too (though this is unrelated to DSR).

This post has been edited by Jasoncat: Jan 5 2015, 02:03 PM
The Analyst
post Jan 5 2015, 03:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Melbourne



Guys, we have a loan with UOB. Not much RM240k that we are thinking of refinancing over to get a better rate. Problem is i am newly self employed in Australia (new company and everything so records of earnings are not available yet). Will that be an issue?

We have an extremely strong asset position (cash on hand, properties in Australia, Malaysia etc...). Will that help at all?

Thanks.
Aik_FEI
post Jan 5 2015, 05:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2014


QUOTE(Jasoncat @ Jan 5 2015, 02:03 PM)
I'm actually quite confused. If I interpret you correctly, you are saying that using one unencumbered property to borrow and redeem another encumbered property with a loan outstanding of RM60k (but why RM60k - do I miss out sth from previous posts?).  Fine, there will only be one loan then.  But this should not be generalised that the DSR will be lower by refinancing as there are too many assumptions involved - the value of the unencumbered property, the outstanding of the existing loan, the monthly instalments of the new and existing loan (to be repaid) etc.  Further, fees (legal, loan documentation and stamp duty) will be incurred, so this has to be factored in too (though this is unrelated to DSR).
*
Bro my bad, I have reedit my post. TYPO !
DO review, and give me some feedback. smile.gif
Jasoncat
post Jan 5 2015, 10:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,913 posts

Joined: Jun 2014
QUOTE(Aik_FEI @ Jan 5 2015, 09:46 AM)
Actually is like this, lets say you refinance a property.

Property price Rm500,000
O/S Price Rm60,000

RM500,000 X90% =RM450,000

RM450,000-RM60,000 = RM390,000

you can cash out RM 390,000

hence, Refinance to a new bank, DSR  Calculation
encumbered Property
O/S loan    =RM60,000    (normal BLR-2.4 / 35 YEARS max)
RM282/month

Term loan  =RM390,000  (normal BLR-2.4 /10 years max )
RM4032/month

TOTAL Back End DSR = RM 4314
Refinance an unencumbered property.

Property Price RM500,000
RM500,000 X90% =RM450,000

You can cash out RM450,000

Unencumbered Property
Term loan  =RM450,000  (normal BLR-2.4 /35 years max )

Rm2115/month

Total Back End DSR = RM2115

BE DSR RM4314 (encumebred) compare to BE DSR RM2115 (unencumbered)

Unencumbered Property approval for income base isn't it lower ?
That's why it's lower for Back end DSR calculation on the unencumbered property, easier loan approval for limited income.

This calculation is based on certain bank, not all bank holds similar calculation.
*
I understand that tenure for the top up portion of a loan (eg your 1st scenario, cash out by RM390k) is subject to 10 years cap. Even for refinancing of an unencumbered property (eg your 2nd scenario, cash out for RM450k), it is also subject to max tenure of 10 years. I know some may disagree - yes I can understand that as there are some banks somehow package it as max 35-year loan. (you don't need to argue with me as I'm just telling what I get to know)

So, if the "cash out" loans in both examples can go up to 35 years or must cap at 10 years, there is no apparent benefit in refinancing of an unencumbered property from the DSR perspective.

1090 Pages « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0215sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 07:41 PM