Hi guys,
I am having a hard time for choosing between this 2 cars,
Need you guys opinion.

For your information:

Honda City V Spec : RM 90,800 (Discount RM 2.5k)
Cerato Kx 1.6 : RM 89,888 (Discount RM 6k)

Thank you.

This post has been edited by edwin1234: Oct 24 2014, 08:39 AM

Refer here bro...this topic discussed few times already...
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3186438

Go for honda shitty la.
korean got the looks but not reliable.

This post has been edited by SWIZZ: Oct 24 2014, 10:35 AM

For Specs and safety,go for Cerato KX. For RV and brand,Toyota bah.

This post has been edited by shinoxun: Oct 24 2014, 10:38 AM

TS, since you are going to folk our money to buy your dream car.

Why you can't take little bit extra time to research around and read some old post?

if i were you. better close this post.

Otherwise this post gonna to have another war of honda vs kia again.

Sure kx LA.. Or if got budget get k3..u won't regret it..
Research more and get more offer...

There is always bound for argument when Honda comes into the picture.

Nobody says Korean makes not reliable anymore. Their reliability have been proven close to Toyota and Mazda. See any Forte owners complaining? None, spare parts also plenty and cheap. My Forte is still running strong in 1 piece. Instead, Honta turns out to have poor reliability need to fix so many things. Can't even take 10,000km service interval.

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Oct 24 2014, 09:40 PM

Cerato KX is C-segment. City V spec is B-segment. Like this, City already lost most of the points here.

Interior space Cerato
Acceleration & speed Cerato
Reliability and maintenance Cerato
Build quality Cerato
Spare parts price & availability Cerato
Safety rating Cerato

The only thing City can win is idling FC. Apart from that, there's nothing to shout, even though the KX doesn't have VSC, the poor build quality City has nothing to put up against. NASA back to old trick of using cheap price to steal customers again.

Prof Jay is back

This post has been edited by dares: Oct 24 2014, 10:16 PM

haha.. your are right!
another Dr. Matrix hasn't show face yet.

good for ya bro. maybe suits u.
but for me, i change my car every 3-5 yrs. beside reliability, resale value is important to me.

OMG. haha. but I do agree that honda qc is abit let down for this model...abit.
and VSC is extremely important dude...

Well. By the way talking about acceleration and speed I don't think cerato has the advantages.. Test drove city and cerato.. I prefer acceleration for city. Speed never really pedal to the Max. So I cant comment..

And why is that reliability and maintenance is Cerato??? Same goes to parts availability.. Is that really so.. Cerato??

I would think yes. For built quality.. But not sure in the long run.. That's for Cerato

Cheers

This post has been edited by Kirsten: Oct 25 2014, 02:49 PM

To me, I won't buy City because it is not famous in terms worldwide..mostly sold around asia countries as a cheap car.. which you will see mostly in Indonesia or Thailand...

Sorry, but this is a silly way to pick a car. A world best-selling car does not necessarily means you will have the same dealership and aftersales support locally.

Ford Focus and Fiesta are one of the best selling cars in the world, but look at the dealer and aftersales network in Malaysia. By comparison, Honda and Toyota's aftersales support are way more superior and convenient compared to contis and kimchis.

This post has been edited by dares: Oct 25 2014, 03:26 PM

Well. That's means u will choose to get the Cerato, and not the City? OMG

Ya..something like tat...but i won't buy Cerato..B segment cars like Vios & City are designed to be cheap..so the quality & design will be so so only (Especially Vios, the designer totally no passion in design it)..they are the lowest part of my list if I want to buy a new car..I will go for C & D segment cars only..any brands will do..as long is good specs, performance, design to my taste...But this dude deciding for Cerato or City...I will say Cerato..

getting a cerato KX with rubbish spec is disrespecting the car itself. Get a proper spec Cerato if you are keen on Cerato. If stupid ppl keep supporting KX, then Naza will become another UMW coming out with stripped down spec cars since its selling over here. By then dont complaint why less airbags or safety features or so.

If I were TS. City would be a preferred choice compare to Cerato.. But if Cerato 2.0 then I would go for that.. 1.6 or KX or stripped down version Cerato is a no no..