QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Dec 3 2014, 02:43 PM)
Banks and the feds gonna do all they can to suppress the value of physical asset like gold or silver.
Dont know how long this money printing business backed by nothing tangible will last...
As long as people accept fiat money, there is a value.
QUOTE(sylar111 @ Dec 3 2014, 04:07 PM)
icemanfx.
That is precisely why Gold is viewed as the best form of money. Because it has no industrialusage.
Because it has very little usage.
The amount of available gold that are currently open is very limited actually.
Based on your theory, gold should be near zero if gold is just something which is aesthetic and has no real value. The fact that 1kg of gold right now could probably buy you a Honda says otherwise.
If gold was so unvaluable, why is that so. Why is it that people still put such a premium on something that just looks nice on the outside. But has no usage as all in other things.
Well, the amount of gold that can be mined is very limited. I believe market forces has priced that in.
So where do you think you want to invest your money in? Stock Market? Do you know the stock market has been tanking recently? So are you proposing that you put your money right now into "good" company and when a crash comes, can come anytime based on fundamentals not only of Malaysia but of the whole world in general, that you just tell yourself that hey I am after all "contributing" to the economy.
Oh put in bonds whereby governments around the world has been inflating like nobodies business.
Or in the over inflated property market that we have which will most likely crash together with the stock market.
You seem to have an understanding of booms and bust. But then your understanding of Gold and the history of Gold is very limited.
The fact that central banks around the world accumulates Gold shows that the top people still put a premium on Gold. If gold was so useless, why are central banks accumulating something which is useless? Are they stupid?
As an economics student, why dun you understand terms like gofo rates instead of just being under the cave?
I think you should maybe try to look at the world not based on just what your professor says.
Gold is not unlike gem stone or paintings, lack of industrial use but there are collectors willing to pay for it, hence a value. Gem stone could worth more than gold by weight and even more limited in supply.
Most central bankers are holding less and less gold as a reserve. As paper money is no longer backed by gold, holding gold is more for perception value.
Gold price has no relation to inflation but speculation.
As over 80% of gold mined is recycled, it has never been a shortage of gold.
QUOTE(sylar111 @ Dec 3 2014, 06:20 PM)
As I said earlier.
If gold is so useless, why is it that 1kg of it can buy you a luxury car.
Why would central banks accumulate this if the fiat system can really isolate this physical asset.
But logic is obviously not your forte.
I agree with you. At the moment, gold does not look like an "inflation" hedge. Any idiot can tell you that based on the chart of recent years.
But then, what if gold is indeed an inflation hedge but because it is currently suppressed and that is why it does not reach it's true value.
What happens when the suppression stops?
Fiat paper money printing is obviously fantasy. I mean unless you think you can really create wealth from thin air. It goes against the logic of things. The thing is. You got so caught up with the stock market which is tanking right now and which is showing signs of crashing that you forget about fundamentals.
Gold price is not been suppressed but abandoned by gold fund investors. If one realised how gold miners orchestrated the last gold bull run, will abstain from buying gold.