Probably.... hahahhahaha. It also probably didn't get 4 stars also as probably can mean either way. When you report, please have some credibility, don't simply said.

If you not yet tested, just said not yet tested, just like SPM, not yet get results, don't confidence said can get straight A's

Probably.... hahahhahaha. It also probably didn't get 4 stars also as probably can mean either way. When you report, please have some credibility, don't simply said.

If you not yet tested, just said not yet tested, just like SPM, not yet get results, don't confidence said can get straight A's

Time for MCAP. Best CAP in the world.

toyota is worse

i remember when listening at Hitz.fm there have an advertisement like

"In toyota, your safety is our priority"

padahal Toyota is the car with the least safety

Vios rated at 4 stars, but do you think 4 stars impressive enough?
Please take note ASEAN NCAP don't preform side impact crash test.
Thus, total accumulated scores doesn't include the side impact crash test.
Refer to my previous post regarding the importance of side airbags.

Well, let me share this Camry vs. Yaris (a.k.a Vios) compatibility crash test at 64 km/h done by IIHS.
Dugong Warrior may find the crash test video offensive and die-die defend their Dugong.
Here are some of their typical responses:

Dugong Warrior: "WTF, you are so stupid! Simple math also don't know LOL. 64x2=128 km/h crash test speed, sure hancur barai la..."
Dugong Warrior: "When accident happen, slam brake kaw-kaw. Thus, the 64 km/h crash test is not applicable. I'm still safe and alive."
Dugong Warrior: "The test is unfair! Camry is luxury car, please find and crash a similar category car."


The crash test result speaks for itself.

Two car head on collision at 64 km/h does really equal to 128 km/h crash test?
Buckle up your seat belt! It's crunch time with MythBusters.

It is certainly 5 star rated car. No doubt about it. But it was done internally  Just like Preve, exora.  The only different, they not use it as marketing when it was tested internally.  That is the mistake.

Australsian NCAP is very strict.  I guess, Asean NCAP should do the same too. Why allow them to use as marketing when the result was not even out in Asean NCAP website?

I believe Perodua found out that GSC/PCC/Iriz wasn't in Ancap's certified list, so they complaint and asked Ancap to force Proton to embarrass themselves.

Perodua is probably the culprit here.

Marketing failed champion is from Proton.
Number 2 goes to Petronas for a cheap Payung marketing...

Side notes: Until now, cant redeem a single set of Payung yet....          

In a sense, it will be the a commercial scandal which you con people thinking you got tested by ANCAP.

And I agreed on what you saying why allow to simply publish the results? The marketing departments' head should rolled if you asked me.
So my questions is? Who do you believe more?

1. A culprit that report others wrong doing?
2. A culprit that report an unpublished or never tested results?

so with only 1 random comment on the blog u guise belip they really ANCAP manager?  lololol

you forget this

so with only 1 random comment on the blog u guise belip they really ANCAP manager?  lololol

From a blog..... So legit