Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
111 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V13

views
     
MilitaryMadness
post Sep 3 2014, 04:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Edit: Wrong intel

Anyway,new thread ahoy!

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Sep 3 2014, 04:24 PM
thpace
post Sep 3 2014, 04:25 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 3 2014, 04:18 PM)
Ehh...Why Chinese ship carrying 2 rusty old Soviet Akula subs?  brows.gif

Anyway,new thread ahoy!
*
more like russian navvy

http://www.asiandefencenews.com/2014/08/ru...ossy-akula.html
MilitaryMadness
post Sep 3 2014, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 3 2014, 04:25 PM)
Ya I admit,wrong intel.... sweat.gif

Dutch Heavy Lift Vessel "Transshelf" in loading process of K-391 "Bratsk" and K-295 "Samara", 2 SSN Project 971, "Shuka-B" (Akula Class), in Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka Krai, Russian Far East, for transport to Severodvinsk, on 23 August 2014. Photo by Igor Kravchuk
atreyuangel
post Sep 3 2014, 06:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(thpace @ Sep 3 2014, 04:08 PM)
kalau nak semua tu in one package, US punya bulu kening sudah naik tahap bulan macam ini brows.gif  brows.gif  brows.gif

btw, still dunno who will operate the marine, not sure atm or tldm or a separate branch by itself

LDP sure most likely controlled by the navy because that what they want since log ago, just the LCAC, AAV, and super cobra siapa?
*
heh, US wanted to give us that because they wanted to piss one particular country off

thpace
post Sep 3 2014, 06:36 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Sep 3 2014, 06:20 PM)
heh, US wanted to give us that because they wanted to piss one particular country off
*
we also tip top around because our relationship with tat particular country whistling.gif

anyway, marine is not much a threat to them in my opinion.. more warships and air defend weapons. Then tat will really pissed them off

Imagine, not able to come close without being scared something could pop up and blast a hole on their ship or down a plane laugh.gif

or naval station at south china sea whistling.gif

This post has been edited by thpace: Sep 3 2014, 06:37 PM
Kaiman
post Sep 3 2014, 06:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Sep 3 2014, 10:08 AM)
uuihh mess baru..

saya melaporkan diri tuan!

on the hindsight

bila la bule tengok rondaan dari PUTD macam ni

user posted image
*
Putd terbang....


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
wanvadder
post Sep 3 2014, 07:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Tristram





somebody gotta rip this thing in HD and upload it

azriel
post Sep 3 2014, 07:23 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
user posted image

QUOTE
GD receives £3.5bn order from UK MoD for Scout SV platforms

3 September 2014

The UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) has awarded a £3.5bn contract to General Dynamics (GD) UK for the delivery of Scout Specialist Vehicle (SV) platforms to the national army.

Under the contract, the company will supply a total of 589 vehicles in six variants to provide essential capability to the Armoured Cavalry within Army 2020.

The variants include scout reconnaissance, equipment support repair, equipment and support recovery, command and control, protected mobility reconnaissance support (PMRS) variants and engineer reconnaissance variants.

The contract also covers the provision of initial in-service support and training and will create up to 1,300 jobs across the programme's UK supply chain, with 300 alone at the company's Oakdale facility.


full article



This post has been edited by azriel: Sep 3 2014, 09:06 PM
atreyuangel
post Sep 3 2014, 07:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 3 2014, 07:31 PM)
We shud srsly get whidbey class from america i thot i read some time back that they were gonna decomm the whidbey from 2013?? Good capabilities plus not that old
*
I believe the ATM got their own planning in this marine matter
it is safe to speculate that when the marine is established then the asset will be made known
plus the ATM are now focusing on the establishment of another division and the original marine plan is more to the Royal Marine small focus group rather then a larger infantry group like the US


atreyuangel
post Sep 3 2014, 08:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(Kaiman @ Sep 3 2014, 06:45 PM)
Putd terbang....
*
heh, terigt pulak cite bapak aku anak2 buah dia pernah bergaduh ngan bebudak PUTD
antara ejekan geng2 ni PUTD = Perasan Udara Tapi Darat laugh.gif

datang bapak aku semua sumbat dalam satu guard room
bila kluar jadik member pulak sweat.gif
RobUlstan
post Sep 3 2014, 08:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 3 2014, 07:35 PM)
Ya subs is best chance in a war with that particular country since everything gonna get sunk in first few days.. Some time back i talked about enlarging pulau layang layang into small town and navy base but everybody say bad idea cuz damage reef, but i think heck care reef la, naval base much more useful when the oil money start flowing biggrin.gif
*
Im not very knowledgeable in military strategy/tactics but may I know what is the use of a naval base there? It's not going to be very defensible, sitting alone in the middle of the sea. Can't they just shoot missiles at it if we really go to war? Our own land is not that far away, so it's not like there is a big advantage in power projection that can be added with this base (unlike for the PRC where their own mainland bases are so far away). Maybe as an observation post and/or as a marker for our claim to this area are the main purposes I can think of for having it.

Thank you for any reply and sorry if this seems naive.
atreyuangel
post Sep 3 2014, 08:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(RobUlstan @ Sep 3 2014, 08:02 PM)
Im not very knowledgeable in military strategy/tactics but may I know what is the use of a naval base there? It's not going to be very defensible, sitting alone in the middle of the sea. Can't they just shoot missiles at it if we really go to war? Our own land is not that far away, so it's not like there is a big advantage in power projection that can be added with this base (unlike for the PRC where their own mainland bases are so far away). Maybe as an observation post and/or as a marker for our claim to this area are the main purposes I can think of for having it.

Thank you for any reply and sorry if this seems naive.
*
actually you've sum it up very good already smile.gif
RobUlstan
post Sep 3 2014, 08:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 3 2014, 08:16 PM)
But it can ensure that any attempted takeover will result in war and probably serve to deter china from attempting to take over because even tho they are a lot stronger they would still want to avoid war so their economy is stable. Otherwise theres a chance we'll end up like philippines getting their islands stolen without any fire
*
Any attempt at takeover on the existing base will already result in war. I don't think making it bigger will have any impact in terms of making it a deterrence if they really want war with us already.
RobUlstan
post Sep 3 2014, 08:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 3 2014, 08:38 PM)
But if we have base there we can hit mainland china with sukhois, currently we cant hit it no matter where our planes takeoff, maybe that chance of getting hit will change things a bit??
*
Notwithstanding the pro/cons of attacking mainland China, as mentioned we already have base there (and there's an airstrip as well already). Don't see the reason of enlarging it as you proposed.
RobUlstan
post Sep 3 2014, 09:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 3 2014, 08:58 PM)
Cant operate fighter jets... Maybe just enlarge the runway and facilities?? A real navy base imo is not needed too, maybe just a refuelling stopover??
*
I do not know what are the capabilities available currently. Maybe someone here more knowledgeable can add some input.
RobUlstan
post Sep 3 2014, 09:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Sep 3 2014, 09:23 PM)
there is a thread about pulau layang layang (Swallow Reef)

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...hl=pulau+layang


*
Thanks. It looks jet capable already.
waja2000
post Sep 3 2014, 10:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 3 2014, 08:38 PM)
But if we have base there we can hit mainland china with sukhois, currently we cant hit it no matter where our planes takeoff, maybe that chance of getting hit will change things a bit??
*
don't think to much, we got ability to attack china.... few year more they event can send Aircraft Carrier to here.
event using sukhois also can't flight to china and come back distance more than 4000km 2 way range from layang-layang.
we zero capability to defense china missile attack all our city. some more air-force/navy base. our navy ship event small than there Coast Guard ship.
If can become asean top military power .... than should be very good already.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Sep 3 2014, 10:12 PM
KYPMbangi
post Sep 4 2014, 03:57 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Malaysian Su-30s to launch live Kh-31s for first time in SCS drill

user posted image

QUOTE
The Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) will conduct the first live firings of Kh-31A anti-ship and Kh-31P anti-radiation missiles (AS-17 'Krypton') from its Sukhoi Su-30MKM fighters during a joint exercise with Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) in the South China Sea this month.

The Kh-31 firings against a sea target will take place in a designated part of the South China Sea routinely used by the RMN for firing practice.

The exact location of the firing area is unknown but military sources confirmed that it is well away from the disputed Spratly Islands to avoid provoking other claimants.

The RMN will also conduct live firings of MBDA MM40 Exocet anti-ship missiles and Seawolf surface-to-air missiles from its ships and MBDA Sea Skua missiles from RMN Super Lynx helicopters.


[Janes]
FlameReaper
post Sep 4 2014, 04:03 AM

I lari portable on my dude
****
Senior Member
560 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: On my portable dude
^ Will this get recorded and released for public viewing like other missile firings we've seen to date?

This post has been edited by FlameReaper: Sep 4 2014, 04:03 AM
KYPMbangi
post Sep 4 2014, 04:12 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(FlameReaper @ Sep 4 2014, 04:03 AM)
^ Will this get recorded and released for public viewing like other missile firings we've seen to date?
*
LTZ


111 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0330sec    0.62    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 01:00 AM