any live missile firing?

exercise only.. like how they come to james shoel

simpan pun tak guna.. baik guna test

tis will be interesting

must post video

BTW how many ship involved?

alah heboh lah sikit

anyway, mana nak check? malas nak google

kalau nak semua tu in one package, US punya bulu kening sudah naik tahap bulan macam ini

btw, still dunno who will operate the marine, not sure atm or tldm or a separate branch by itself

LDP sure most likely controlled by the navy because that what they want since log ago, just the LCAC, AAV, and super cobra siapa?

more like russian navvy

http://www.asiandefencenews.com/2014/08/ru...ossy-akula.html

we also tip top around because our relationship with tat particular country

anyway, marine is not much a threat to them in my opinion.. more warships and air defend weapons. Then tat will really pissed them off

Imagine, not able to come close without being scared something could pop up and blast a hole on their ship or down a plane

or naval station at south china sea

This post has been edited by thpace: Sep 3 2014, 06:37 PM

Russia wont be too happy about this. Even if we buy.

No money woh... 1.7billion makan our whole budget ad for next rmk

Dah tembak?

Target. Container barge ?

Pilak tak kesah... central gov bodoh, dont want give permission to shoot..

Like seeing a robber rob but cant take any action than fire warning shots. Pilak know this and wave their hand like no problem. Politics at its highest

Asking thr exercise anyway. No gamber keluar yet. Boring tunggu.

But the 2009 used a stationary barge, just wonder have the navy try on moving target?

rakam pasti ada.. the question will it released to the public?

Not will not deliver

Hold delivery until november as on the contract. Supposedly earlier delivery, now delay the delivery and see what will happen before making any futher decision on france side.

If decided to not deliver, russian can sue for contract violation and still get the ship. France cant afford to lose the contract either way. If they dont deliver they won't get paid and russia will sue them also

I not sure wther the navy would prefer the flat top version like the mistral or dokdo or more ship like design with submersible well deck. During the MALUX AMPHEX 2014, i am sure the navy get to see the diff of those when USS Makin Island and other support ships arrived

Personally, i would prefer the flat top version because it would be more capable on the long run and it more function for the future marine plan. Able to deploy more attack or asw helicopters and amphibious vehicles

BTW LTZ

What is the actual MPSS requirements, alot of mix information on the requirements

1) some say 2 unit, while some say 3 unit (Bernama report 3 unit, Link)

2) some say ~8000ton while others say RMN might consider a full-size (14000 ton) version based on cost and future requirements link

3) Some say the requirements changed ever since the marine plan take full swing ( Attack helo, asw heli, lcac and aav have to be included in the deal) - logic juga buy amphibious ship but not equipments inside

All the "some say", what is your comment?

tat when u visited mistral, the navy chief ada tunjuk interest tak?

again some say mistral is under heavy consideration because our past trading with DCNS and easier system integration but price tag abit mahal, - Bousted

then dokdo come in, cheaper and almost same capabilities and plus equip with US defence equipments( Only the hulls is korean, the rest sensors and defense system are provided the by US based on current dokdo class installation) - NGVTECH

then china type 071 come in, even cehaper - ini gua tak tahu siapa akan bina

lagi lama, lagi i pun tak tahu apa mindef tengah plan ni...

It more like Boustead VS NGVTech, siapa akan dapat contract

This post has been edited by thpace: Sep 5 2014, 06:02 PM

dokdo was first proposed given the mou with the korean ship building company, ada send team evaluate

then only atlas reported when the mindef does no have enough $$$ to buy the dokso class

itu wat i dengar lah

look like the hull from the T-series tank while the turret is the copy of American M1 front and British challenger sides

if u want low, i would prefer the K2 design, slight heavier by rough weight 55 ton and lower or higher its suspension height

Best of all, got cooperation with Turkey

plus side, it look bad ass compared to the traditional slope turret designt


today no exercise?

This post has been edited by thpace: Sep 6 2014, 10:16 PM

K2 is 4th gen, mbt300 is 3rd gen of course it would be more complex or bigger plus more expensive (most expensive tank)

if you want smaller, of course the other would be the Type 10. But by far, I still like the K2.

K2 ftw... Type 10 impossible due to japan export ban

Just liffted, but they still have not decided what weapon they are willing to export out. The latest was to india ShinMaywa US-2.. csar version only

K2, big heavy, technology centric and advance comparable to france leclerc tank .

show of muscle