QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Nov 15 2014, 07:55 PM)
judging from the sat pic (if it is not fake), surely the pilot able to distinguish whether it's a civil plane or military from that distance won't he..?
at the very least, i'm very sure the pilot would know it's a big plane from that distance..big but alone plane..seemingly harmless..and iinm SOP for fighter pilots is they would close in and check the 'bogie' for further clarification aren't they?
which bring us to the question, assuming the pic is valid, why would the pilot shoot it down?
but i rather believe the rebels shoot it down as it's more logical.. coz maybe they're trained to just track and shoot targets..not trained to identify whether the target is friend or foe..also, i'm sure u guys remember the recordings of phone calls about some rebels talking about "shot down an airliner" which went viral few days after the incident..
Ukraine need nato support, nato members need good excuse to send army. Murica needs more country to support sanction against Russia. This is whyi like to know the conversation between Ukraine ATC n the pilot which is still disclosed until today. The mh 17 on route on that day is also different compare to days ago if u really follow the news from different media sources.
Somesaid putin plane just passed that area.
Many reasons why the pilot need to down it, if yr mind is willing to accept who politician is all looking for own benefits, life onboard.... who care.
So, we dont know what exactly happen, who shot it down. anyway, this is military thread don wish to further.