Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
111 Pages « < 68 69 70 71 72 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V13

views
     
[MY]Sandman
post Oct 16 2014, 06:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2014
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 15 2014, 06:19 PM)
Ori or tarp?
*
Checked.. original lady biggrin.gif not originally a man wink.gif
waja2000
post Oct 16 2014, 09:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
Yongshu Island (Yongshu Reef) now become bigger island in Spratly Islands 16/10/2014

user posted image

compare to Taiping Island (taiwan control)
user posted image

current size

user posted image


user posted image

future become this....? wait end this year will know .... went reclamation land near complete.
user posted image

This post has been edited by waja2000: Oct 16 2014, 09:38 PM
kucinganaz
post Oct 16 2014, 11:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Jan 2013
From: Bandar Pelancongan & Maritim
^ PRC say no..
waja2000
post Oct 16 2014, 11:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(General Fahmy @ Oct 16 2014, 11:12 PM)
why? want to build palm jumeirah there is it?
*
location in center of Spratly Islands, means can control in Spratly Islands ...PLA Airforce and Navy base will be there
future will announce ADIZ over Spratly Islands ...
for military prospective, just strategic location went any conflict with Vietnam and Philippine, can launch air attack.
for ecomonic, can control shipping line via Melaka street to japan/korea/HK.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Oct 16 2014, 11:44 PM
SUShack3line
post Oct 17 2014, 02:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: MALAYSIA maksudnya Tanah Melayu dalam bahasa latin


tahniah United Nations Malaysia dah berjaya menang kerusi utama UN Security Council seat tahun 2015 biggrin.gif

http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014...ysia-UNSC-seat/
user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Oct 17 2014, 05:58 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


MALBATT Crowd and Riot Control (CRC) training

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

[MY Jointforce]
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 17 2014, 08:40 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


Will we ever consider AN-70 to supplement the A-400M? From the spec, it has greater range, greater fuel economy and it's cost almost 1/3rd of the A400M. When European Air Force started the FLA program (Future Large Aircraft) An-70 was chosen as the leading design. But because of the pressure from the political institution and Europe Aviation industries, A400M was chosen instead. Since we dont have the political limitation the Europe have, maybe we can acquire some of this aircraft.

user posted image
Piap
post Oct 17 2014, 08:59 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 07:40 AM)
Will we ever consider AN-70 to supplement the A-400M? From the spec, it has greater range, greater fuel economy and it's cost almost 1/3rd of the A400M. When European Air Force started the FLA program (Future Large Aircraft) An-70 was chosen as the leading design. But because of the pressure from the political institution and Europe Aviation industries, A400M was chosen instead. Since we dont have the political limitation the Europe have, maybe we can acquire some of this aircraft.

user posted image
*
Antonov nearly grounded in ukraine
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/world/av...in-ukraine.html

What we need now is c-130j as replacement to the c-130 h models
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 17 2014, 09:15 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(General Fahmy @ Oct 17 2014, 08:54 AM)
My perspective is, for China they need to build an airstrip because Spratleys is really far from mainland. For us, Sabah is quite near. Don;t think we need to expand the island. As long as we have significant military deterents.

Like perhaps we can buy land based anti-ship missles and put some Jernas batteries on Layang-Layang, then symbolically China would see we mean business. Also if we have a capable marine assault force that can rapidly deploy to Layang-Layang within minutes, equip them with LST, amphibous tanks and military helicopters.
*
Can we use landing craft instead? It's not that far. Some landing craft have ocean going capability.
atreyuangel
post Oct 17 2014, 09:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(Piap @ Oct 17 2014, 08:59 AM)
Antonov nearly grounded in ukraine
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/world/av...in-ukraine.html

What we need now is c-130j as replacement to the c-130 h models
*
I would prefer if RMAF takes the 12 unit of A400 that the Germany wanted to let go
KYPMbangi
post Oct 17 2014, 10:10 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 17 2014, 09:45 AM)
I would prefer if RMAF takes the 12 unit of A400 that the Germany wanted to let go
*
Spain also letting go 13
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 17 2014, 10:15 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


Enlarge Stesen Lima. Buy some S-300/400 and some Brahmos shore batteries and deploy it there. Also useful if we can deploy some Ballistic Missile to launch a missile strike at the enemy airfiled and render them useless for a while.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 17 2014, 10:17 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 17 2014, 09:45 AM)
I would prefer if RMAF takes the 12 unit of A400 that the Germany wanted to let go
*
If they agree to sell at half-price if not for free, maybe we should.
MilitaryMadness
post Oct 17 2014, 10:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 10:15 AM)
Enlarge Stesen Lima. Buy some S-300/400 and some Brahmos shore batteries and deploy it there. Also useful if we can deploy some Ballistic Missile to launch a missile strike at the enemy airfiled and render them useless for a while.
*
user posted image
PRC kata jangan!
waja2000
post Oct 17 2014, 10:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 08:40 AM)
Will we ever consider AN-70 to supplement the A-400M? From the spec, it has greater range, greater fuel economy and it's cost almost 1/3rd of the A400M. When European Air Force started the FLA program (Future Large Aircraft) An-70 was chosen as the leading design. But because of the pressure from the political institution and Europe Aviation industries, A400M was chosen instead. Since we dont have the political limitation the Europe have, maybe we can acquire some of this aircraft.

user posted image
*
An-70 not yet complete testing, in last phase, but budget issue keep delay the project.
also have production/politically issue to solve.
if can see in 2018 than very good liao, if not event possible face to cancel the project. but i read they try sell project to other country. maybe china want it ?

This post has been edited by waja2000: Oct 17 2014, 10:51 AM
waja2000
post Oct 17 2014, 10:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 10:15 AM)
Enlarge Stesen Lima. Buy some S-300/400 and some Brahmos shore batteries and deploy it there. Also useful if we can deploy some Ballistic Missile to launch a missile strike at the enemy airfiled and render them useless for a while.
*
we no $$$$ .....
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 17 2014, 10:54 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 17 2014, 10:52 AM)
we no $$$$ .....
*
If China really did build an airfield and deploy fighters withing striking range of our shore, We maybe left with little choice.
MilitaryMadness
post Oct 17 2014, 10:59 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 10:54 AM)
If China really did build an airfield and deploy fighters withing striking range of our shore, We maybe left with little choice.
*
Island stations only act as trip wires. If PLA have aircraft that already reach our shores, then it's already too late.
waja2000
post Oct 17 2014, 11:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 10:54 AM)
If China really did build an airfield and deploy fighters withing striking range of our shore, We maybe left with little choice.
*
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 17 2014, 10:59 AM)
Island stations only act as trip wires. If PLA have aircraft that already reach our shores, then it's already too late.
*
any how, we no military power to fight with China, just need to admit it..
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Oct 17 2014, 11:17 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Oct 17 2014, 11:04 AM)
any how, we no military power to fight with China, just need to admit it..
*
Might as well give up everything then.

111 Pages « < 68 69 70 71 72 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0238sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:48 AM