QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 15 2014, 06:19 PM)
Checked.. original lady
Military Thread V13
Military Thread V13
|
|
Oct 16 2014, 06:29 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2014 |
|
|
|
Oct 16 2014, 09:28 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
Yongshu Island (Yongshu Reef) now become bigger island in Spratly Islands 16/10/2014
compare to Taiping Island (taiwan control) current size future become this....? wait end this year will know .... went reclamation land near complete. ![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Oct 16 2014, 09:38 PM |
|
|
Oct 16 2014, 11:05 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
17 posts Joined: Jan 2013 From: Bandar Pelancongan & Maritim |
^ PRC say no..
|
|
|
Oct 16 2014, 11:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(General Fahmy @ Oct 16 2014, 11:12 PM) location in center of Spratly Islands, means can control in Spratly Islands ...PLA Airforce and Navy base will be therefuture will announce ADIZ over Spratly Islands ... for military prospective, just strategic location went any conflict with Vietnam and Philippine, can launch air attack. for ecomonic, can control shipping line via Melaka street to japan/korea/HK. This post has been edited by waja2000: Oct 16 2014, 11:44 PM |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 02:17 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
29 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: MALAYSIA maksudnya Tanah Melayu dalam bahasa latin |
tahniah United Nations Malaysia dah berjaya menang kerusi utama UN Security Council seat tahun 2015
http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014...ysia-UNSC-seat/ ![]() |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 05:58 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 08:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Will we ever consider AN-70 to supplement the A-400M? From the spec, it has greater range, greater fuel economy and it's cost almost 1/3rd of the A400M. When European Air Force started the FLA program (Future Large Aircraft) An-70 was chosen as the leading design. But because of the pressure from the political institution and Europe Aviation industries, A400M was chosen instead. Since we dont have the political limitation the Europe have, maybe we can acquire some of this aircraft.
![]() |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 08:59 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Aug 2014 |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 07:40 AM) Will we ever consider AN-70 to supplement the A-400M? From the spec, it has greater range, greater fuel economy and it's cost almost 1/3rd of the A400M. When European Air Force started the FLA program (Future Large Aircraft) An-70 was chosen as the leading design. But because of the pressure from the political institution and Europe Aviation industries, A400M was chosen instead. Since we dont have the political limitation the Europe have, maybe we can acquire some of this aircraft. Antonov nearly grounded in ukraine![]() http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/world/av...in-ukraine.html What we need now is c-130j as replacement to the c-130 h models |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 09:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(General Fahmy @ Oct 17 2014, 08:54 AM) My perspective is, for China they need to build an airstrip because Spratleys is really far from mainland. For us, Sabah is quite near. Don;t think we need to expand the island. As long as we have significant military deterents. Can we use landing craft instead? It's not that far. Some landing craft have ocean going capability.Like perhaps we can buy land based anti-ship missles and put some Jernas batteries on Layang-Layang, then symbolically China would see we mean business. Also if we have a capable marine assault force that can rapidly deploy to Layang-Layang within minutes, equip them with LST, amphibous tanks and military helicopters. |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 09:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E |
QUOTE(Piap @ Oct 17 2014, 08:59 AM) Antonov nearly grounded in ukraine I would prefer if RMAF takes the 12 unit of A400 that the Germany wanted to let gohttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/world/av...in-ukraine.html What we need now is c-130j as replacement to the c-130 h models |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:10 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Enlarge Stesen Lima. Buy some S-300/400 and some Brahmos shore batteries and deploy it there. Also useful if we can deploy some Ballistic Missile to launch a missile strike at the enemy airfiled and render them useless for a while.
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:48 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 08:40 AM) Will we ever consider AN-70 to supplement the A-400M? From the spec, it has greater range, greater fuel economy and it's cost almost 1/3rd of the A400M. When European Air Force started the FLA program (Future Large Aircraft) An-70 was chosen as the leading design. But because of the pressure from the political institution and Europe Aviation industries, A400M was chosen instead. Since we dont have the political limitation the Europe have, maybe we can acquire some of this aircraft. An-70 not yet complete testing, in last phase, but budget issue keep delay the project. ![]() also have production/politically issue to solve. if can see in 2018 than very good liao, if not event possible face to cancel the project. but i read they try sell project to other country. maybe china want it ? This post has been edited by waja2000: Oct 17 2014, 10:51 AM |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:52 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 10:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,302 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Over your shoulder |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Oct 17 2014, 10:54 AM) If China really did build an airfield and deploy fighters withing striking range of our shore, We maybe left with little choice. QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 17 2014, 10:59 AM) Island stations only act as trip wires. If PLA have aircraft that already reach our shores, then it's already too late. any how, we no military power to fight with China, just need to admit it.. |
|
|
Oct 17 2014, 11:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
580 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0238sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:48 AM |