News LINK

Apmm ship in news also give by Custom Australia。
bukan saja APMM，Polis, ATM juga banyak aset yang lama.

I am expecting the question.....aku baca signal hari jumaat lepas so dah lupa nama ape..... but 2 different classes.

Brahmos-M to be introduced by DRDO and NPO Machinostraya for export

Manufacturers unveiled a smaller version of the hypersonic BrahMos cruise missile specifially designed for air launches. The missile,noticeably smaller than its parent version, is about 6 meters in length with a speed of mach 3.5. The range is reportedly shorter than the full version due to space restrictions on fuel.

While the BrahMos-M missile is originally designed to be carried by the Su-30MK fighter series,it can also be fitted onto the MiG 29K, Mirage 2000 and Dassault Rafale. The Su-30MK can carry up to 3 of the BrahMos-M missile (centerline & 2 wing pylons). The missile is slated to be in full production for the Russian and Indian military in 2017 with some set aside for export markets to interseted countries.
Eh,muat Su-30 & Mig 29? apa lagi,MENHAN boleh start tempahan la!

I thot most anti ship missile nowadays got land attack function like our navy future exocet block 3. I think rbs15 and c802 also rite. Maybe we shud stick to exocet and use land base exocet oso

lets mind fucuk


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=08d_1403263794

Leak photo showed US piloted F-22 "shot" down by a Malaysian piloted Mig-29 during the recent Exercise Cope Taufan in Malaysia. The photo showed the F-22 failed to radar jam the Mig and was releasing flares to avoid missile lock-on by the Mig-29, but was later nailed by cannon fire instead.
me donno how legit this is pasla tak terlibat secara lansung ngan Cope Taufan

hahaha

Talking about anti-ship missiles, I thought I saw photos from a parade in KL where they showcased a  KH-31 (AS-17 'Krypton") but as I looked it up & found out what we have is only the anti-radiation missile version. No anti-ship version of KH-31 in our arsenal?

Japanese submarine purchase would be historic and controversial

Australia’s move towards buying up to 12 Japanese Soryu submarines represents a historic and deeply controversial shift in national defence and military acquisition policy.

If, as seems increasingly likely, political and industry leaders in Tokyo and Canberra can agree on terms, the Japanese submarines would be Australia’s first major strategic defence procurement from an Asian power and would significantly boost the country’s regional maritime power.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/...d-controversial

why so against china?
event we got that sub, we also nothing to flight with china. china missile just easily destroy our city.

why so against china?
event we got that sub, we also nothing to flight with china. china missile just easily destroy our city.

china will punish as if we buy weapon from japan ... direct or indirect way using economic, etc etc ...

There's nothing wrong with protecting your allies and making sure they toe the line (Japan). After all, in this region the aggressor isn't the US. All those bases have been purely for defense of their allies.
It's been a useless relationship. When Malacca was invaded, where was Ming? Nowhere. Their words and promises were useless. Malacca paid tribute in return for military protection and they didn't do shit. One of their other tributaries invaded Malacca and what did they do? Just send an envoy conveying their anger to that tributary and refused to do anything. When the Portuguese invaded and took Malacca, they didn't do squat to help take it back or give military support. They just took the easy way out and executed the Portuguese that were already in China. Fat lot of good that did for us. All that gold in tribute given in vain. When they were under commie rule or invaded by Japan, we were the ones to send support back to China, not them to us. We were one of the first in the world to recognize their country.

China has the potential to be the new "Japan" that everyone in this region hates. It's inconceivable for one superpower (the US) to invade this region let alone our country and yet everyone knows that's a strong possibility that the other rising superpower will start flexing their muscles as they have already done. Once their aircraft carriers are done and they start projecting power across the sea you'll start seeing more of this. What happens when they go too far? Who will stop them? WWIII won't be started by the Middle Eastern countries or by Russia. It'll happen in this region.

Very,very long range due to economic turboprop engine, they are very reliable and still useful for missions like marine reconnaissance and long-range flights. In the bomber role the Tu-95 would be probably near-obsolete,though. Anyway, Russia has more capable bombers with greater speed and payload than Tu-95 (Tu-160, Tu-22M)  but for peace time reconnaissance missions, Tu-95 are the best plane they have for the job.

US bagi FTA

its more that FTA was forced upon us..
Indon can get 100% ToT, kita dapat 10% ToT, at best..

Why is it always Malaysia invades Singapore or Indonesia invades Singapore??

What's good in that? Singapore is nothing but a resource-less island. It depends on trade and service.....once invaded, they are all gone. Singapore becomes useless and an excess burden.....

It's more useful for Singapore to invade Bintan....it has more than 100 million tons of bauxite reserves. It can also provide more living space and better control on trade route on the strait.

But u get my idea right, western anti ship missiles all small and low range except maybe rbs15 and jsm

sometimes it is not economical reasoning... israel for instance
very much agree... well said
threat to? jemaah islamiah? abu sayyap? al maunah? isma?