QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Sep 19 2006, 12:15 AM)
I'll say schummi is a good driver, but still not the best. His acheivements are overhyped. for one, all of his records are set when F1 drivers have more races to drive, and more points to gain. Remember that during the times of Prost and Senna, winners will only get 9 points. Now they got 10.
Thus the only thing that he really can boast about is Win/GP entered.
Look at the comparison of Poles
Schummi - 68/247 = 27%
Senna - 65/162 = 40%!!!
the numbrs does not tell the bigger picture. Fangio won 5 WC when he was near 50! If F1 had started earlier than 1950, he could have easily won more. Not to mention that he also raced in many more races like the Mille Migilia rally. Schummi cannot compare to that.
Impressive conclusion.Thus the only thing that he really can boast about is Win/GP entered.
Look at the comparison of Poles
Schummi - 68/247 = 27%
Senna - 65/162 = 40%!!!
the numbrs does not tell the bigger picture. Fangio won 5 WC when he was near 50! If F1 had started earlier than 1950, he could have easily won more. Not to mention that he also raced in many more races like the Mille Migilia rally. Schummi cannot compare to that.
The quality of Senna's record.
Superb.
Also, Michael broke those records after Prost retired and Senna died.
We cannot lie to ourselves by saying those two were not the best.
They were legends.
If they continue racing and Senna did not die...we can never know how
Michael do.
Anyways, the past is the past.
In my heart (and I bet others too) Michael is not the best.
Ayrton Senna is.
This post has been edited by Raikkonen: Sep 19 2006, 12:31 AM
Sep 19 2006, 12:30 AM

Quote
0.0395sec
0.37
7 queries
GZIP Disabled