QUOTE(briantwj @ Aug 20 2014, 10:03 PM)
^ ok then, I'll msg Roman to sell Oscar to PSG.

inb4 #Oscarout
It's all about balance. Yes, Oscar natural position is playmaker. But Mou see his other speciality too, his workrate.
Last season, our pivot were not creative enuff. Hence Oscar have to burden the playmaking along with Hazard and Wiliian. But now, we have Fab in pivot who can be a deep lying playmaker. Oscar vs Fab. Who is proven in the PL? Of coz FAb. He had so many season in PL dy, Oscar just had 3 season in the PL. So naturally, Mou will want the more experience player (Fab) to do the playmaking. While Oscar's role for now is similar to Ramires. Tbh, for now I see our playmaking going thru Fab, Hazard. Not Oscar and Schurrle. Oscar's job shud be sumthing like Ramires' job last season. Schurrle's job will be like runner + odd goal.
Btw, let's not be too harsh on Oscar. These brazillians, germans have had a long summer playing the WC. They joined up with the squad quite late in the pre season. Match fitness and form could also be a thing. Let's judge Oscar after 1/3 of the season.
Tldr version. I foresee Oscar playing in a different type of role now that Mou is using Fab as a deep lying playmaker. Imho, Oscar is our best midfielder in pressing the opposition and winning the ball from their DM and defender. Ram does it quite well too, but he always end up with a foul. Oscar's tackle and pressing in the opposition half is second to none in the Chelsea squad.
In our own half, we expect Matic to be a pressing midfielder. But higher up the pitch, it is the presence of Oscar and Costa that is pressing the opposition and winning the ball high up the pitch. Just like what Mou emphasized last season. His philosophy for us, is to win the ball up high in the opposition half, and launch our attack. It is Oscar's work rate and pressing that always wins him a place in Mou's starting 11. imho la.
QUOTE(kucingmainan @ Aug 20 2014, 10:07 PM)
that is why i think he did ok for the last game. not great. decent game for his standard. not exceptional.
i dont think mikel or ramires suit our passing game (we pass a lot in last match). both mikel and ramires have limited range in their passing, not to mention poor first touch.
agree on oscar performance after mata departure. i am one of the guy from 'mata team' and keep on dwelling on 'if only we have mata, we could have win the game' last season. not once, not twice, but almost everytime when the team fail to perform.
hazard done pretty well imo. successfully dribble past numbers of defender, click well with our attacking dept, tracking back & cover for dave. same old hazrd.
for world cup performance, everyone from our contingent play poorly bar schurrle.
current squad good enough for me. got top class cover for each position. our 'second' team can challenge for top4 spot imo.
may i know which am/winger would u suggest to compliment our world class squad?
p/s: i think our defence quite shaky in the last game. cahill and terry both have their share of sloppy moment.
if he is playing a different type of role, something similar to Ramires, that I accept as a reason that he performed below my expectation. However, it still doesn't seem right..

the problem with him is that when Chelsea desperately need a mastermind to create goals, he is not there for us. He lacks the creativity to become a star player and dictate the game. What if Chelsea plays without Fabi and Hazard? We have no extra "key" to tear out opponent's defense. Do we need another playmaker capable of dribbling, passing, and well positioned to create goals? Also, set piece skills are very,very important. We got +1 (Fabi) this season, but we need more
Ok, there is no such thing as "perfect" player that can defend and attack brilliantly both at the same time. However, in the aspect of defensive work, I believe that it depends on the player's strength and stamina. Is Oscar's defending abilities on par with Yaya Toure? Can he really win the ball when he is chasing it with world class ball holding midfielders? I have a doubt on it. Yes, he is very determined and he is the "Mourinho's boy" (always stick to his plan)

but is he the only one who has such ability?
Before he left, Mata was determined too and tried to chased the balls as hard as he can, but no chance was given to him

I believe that work rate is all about strength and determination, and Chelsea need more than that.
In response to #kucingmainan question, maybe I'm being too subjective and it's still very early of the season, but I think we can have the perfect squad if we can get Sanchez (okok I know it's IM-POS-SI-BLE!

)
I've looked at his first game and I'm so impressed of his performance. People says that Spanish League is no way on par with EPL, and the footballers playing there will most likely being crushed by EPL's aggressive and rough playing style. However, I see that he fits absolutely well, and this is only his first EPL game! He runs all over the pitch, from left>middle>right, then next minute right>middle>left, omg he is everywhere! He can take corners, free kicks, everything you need as a set piece taker. When he was robbed of the ball, he can be so aggressive that he chase and strike on his opponent everytime. The referee had no chance but to fouled him but even so, he shouted and claimed that the referee was wrong. In fact, I think Sanchez was the real reason why Arsenal grab the narrow win (though motm is Ramsey) This is the determination thing I haven't seen in a long time, what Chelsea and Man Utd were well known for, what was need to become a real champion. Sanchez has give Arsene the spirit they lack in years.
Well I shouldn't praise our rival's player so much, but yeah, this is what I think of a qualified am/winger for Chelsea