You sure lrt can carry more load than mrt??????

I am sure MRT supposed to carry more people. MRT is more superior than LRT.

MRT is bigger and faster. Maybe SBK line expected to have less passengers.

LRT Kelana Jaya line obviously more passenger than MRT should it upgraded to MRT? No because it already serves the purpose and there is no difference both MRT and LRT in Malaysia because capacity is the same as well stations coverage.

45km Ampang line - KL, Puchong, Ampang,
46km Kelana Jaya line- KL, Gombak, Subang Jaya, Petaling Jaya
51km SBK line KL, Kajang, Sungai Buloh, Petaling Jaya, Cheras-Selangor
37km Klang line - Petaling Jaya, Shah Alam, Klang

Non of this LRT stay in within city almost all travel between cities works same like MRT, in the available capacity also design for the same purpose.

This post has been edited by sama_kun: Jan 31 2018, 03:10 PM

Then , they should just used LRT only, because they cost less than MRT.

klang people capacity, 700k+
KL people capacity, 700k+

klang is highest capacity in Selangor.

if is not, no LRT come to klang.

I dun know why LRT 3 cannot connect to KL area ?

LRT 3 should be go LRT KLCC station directly !
*yes exchange in glenmarie station.

any LRT 3 link to other line ? only 1U MRT and klang KTM ?

any news about skypark railway ?
no further news after announcement.

This post has been edited by Hanford: Jan 31 2018, 04:08 PM

LRT is much easier to build and efficiency. Actually, for Malaysia the cost of MRT and LRT did not give much difference, you see MRT SBK 20billion cost for 51km this including the undergrown network. LRT3 cost 9 billion for 37km, without no underground route and use much cost-effective construction U-trough still cost 9 billion. In MRT each km will cost 1 billion cost for undergrown so it added much costly construction. Imo they should just build MRT directly since it just about the same function and cost.

MRT=Mass RT whereas LRT=Light RT, I think the name speak for itself. Perhaps the current MRT is not running on full carriage capacity cos they r not expecting huge passenger, tats Y it's only 20,000 per direction for MRT which is lower than the current LRT capacity. If u look at the LRT train wen they stop at the station, dont think can add anymore carriage to increase the load unlike current MRT carriages which r quite short.

Why no KL? is just bad planning by prasarana, although there still possible for LRT in BU to be extended through Sungai Kayu Ara hading towards Penchala move undergrown and having an interchange with MRT3 in Mont Kiara, Sri Hartamas. MRT 1 interchange Pusat Bandar Damansara, Telawi and end at last interchange in KL Sentral. Hopefully, they already got some extension planning in future. Otherwise, this LRT is the most useless interchange at BU and Glenmarie not directly to KL.

Maybe LRT 4, etc or MRT 3, etc will create more interchanges with existing lines. Dont think V can stop at just LRT 3 & MRT 3 if v wan to have a comprehensive transport system for Greater KL.

MRT is definitely suppose to carry more people.. can see the no. of passengers keep increasing but still the passengers is lesser than LRT Kelana Jaya line

Give time leh..
LRT KJ not overnight suddenly so high traffic passengers..
Slow slow load increasing..
That's why from 2 carriage train to 4 carriage now 🙏

actually have other new line in future.

if look the new future development on transit, the minimum have 2 new line.


MRT 3
MRT_Circle_Line


This post has been edited by Hanford: Feb 1 2018, 09:39 AM

lrt3 are not stopped at johan setia. it will continue.

lrt3 has underground section.

yes, mayb after 10 yrs

Klang_Valley_Integrated_Transit_System

why 10 years?

yupe.. slow slow increase

they will start construction other line 1st,

after that mayb start LRT 3 extended.

Don't forget..
Slow slow increase in $$ too 😎
From rm1 to 1.20 😁

Slow slow wait. I don't think Gov will do up to Coalfield.