QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 19 2014, 09:06 PM)
dead people cant post in forums and tell us that car safety features are important. that's why we dont hear many forumers agree that safety is important.
sounds legit Hot Stuff Proton GSC with butt picture
|
|
Jun 19 2014, 09:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 12:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,011 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
QUOTE(allenultra @ Jun 19 2014, 07:49 PM) Met Perodua service department executive today, apparently new Viva will be out very soon. September/October thats news allen, i knew that the new perodua will eventually replacing viva,but not that sooner. but based on the price bracket,it seems it will replace viva asap cuz the viva price just being reduced due to cost saving measurements(as they said), n the new perodua price is at the new viva pricing.The cheapest variant can be bought at just 26k, the highest variant shall not cost more than 40k. I hope p2-30a being released before the Viva, hopefully at least one month earlier. unless the new viva pricing is stock clearence,then,it seems viva being kill by its own product then. the pricing between 26k to 40k is a rightful price for new a segment perodua. iinm,its siblings in indonesia only use 1 engine option that is new 1 l engine. previously i thought the price will be around 1.0 l viva, around 35k to 45k. it seems that perodua really want this p2 new baby to go head to head with gcc. thats good actually. this means prtn marketing teams need to come out with something special. n i hope,even the price war strategy seems favouring perodua,proton n drb shud stick to the plan,even baseline has all the passive safety equipments,of course,the numbers of airbags will be reduced to 2,but others still intact. just afraid the board taking any radical movement to offer just a basic offering. thats what happened so many times previously, hope they do it right this time. dont waste the effort done by rnd team. kadajawi,of course everything is done to surpass suprima, but in safety aspect,even toyota n bimmer missed the mark even during the dev stage,it aces all the required test. thats why i rather compare gcc with other prtn,rather than other marques. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 12:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,011 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
and i do hope gcc will be launch sooner than new perodua or at the same time. easier to people in making comparison even its not apple to apple comparison.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 02:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
@mat79: Are you talking about BMW and Toyota not doing well in the small overlap test? I doubt these cars were ever meant for a small overlap test. And to be competitive Proton only needs to do well on regular 40% overlap tests.
Not sure Proton should even try to compete with the Viva/Viva successor. How could they? It's a smaller car, made much cheaper and probably nowhere near as safe. It should compete with the Myvi, and that's it. And ideally it comes with full safety specs in all cars, because that way there's no chance of a crash test involving a car that only has 2 airbags, thus ending up with a not so good result. I doubt the general public will differentiate and say oh, the higher spec car is safe, the lower one isn't. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 09:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
854 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Cheras, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 19 2014, 06:33 PM) Heard they changed the internal name. From GSC to GCC (Global Compact Car). DRB punya kerja lagi kot. But the codename still remain the same i think. P2-30a. haiyooo even the name of the car they also cannot make up their mind? I think Mat79 just playing nice with Perodua. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 09:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
395 posts Joined: May 2008 |
The car looks nice...hope the price is ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 09:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
854 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Cheras, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(jimmybcmy @ Jun 20 2014, 09:24 AM) i like the front looks but not the back and C-pillar of this car...about price i already mentioned in my previous comment... they asked us to tick which price range we willing to pay for this car and it started from 50k-60k... hope it will be cheaper that that since this is our own local car.. but who knows since DR M already said want to change strategy from being maker of cheap cars to become world-class carmaker... http://paultan.org/2014/06/09/proton-change-strategy-dr-m/ This post has been edited by one81: Jun 20 2014, 09:35 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 09:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,011 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 20 2014, 02:45 AM) @mat79: Are you talking about BMW and Toyota not doing well in the small overlap test? I doubt these cars were ever meant for a small overlap test. And to be competitive Proton only needs to do well on regular 40% overlap tests. @kadajawi,nope,previously,some of the cars didnt get full starts,they had to revise it n after that they manage to get flying colors. its not a big thing by the way,just want to point even test were done extensively,still in the end,we are human,nothing perfect though.Not sure Proton should even try to compete with the Viva/Viva successor. How could they? It's a smaller car, made much cheaper and probably nowhere near as safe. It should compete with the Myvi, and that's it. And ideally it comes with full safety specs in all cars, because that way there's no chance of a crash test involving a car that only has 2 airbags, thus ending up with a not so good result. I doubt the general public will differentiate and say oh, the higher spec car is safe, the lower one isn't. the code still the same,never change, p230a. gsc or gcc its not a code or its official name. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 09:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,011 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
there r some a segment being benchmark models,but not viva or viva replacements of course.
the gcc will cater the a n b segment for prtn. it wont be financially wise for prtn to come out with another a segment car.since the next b sedan segment will be based from gcc. c segment already have preve n suprima. the only thing left is d segment. there wont be too many b segments as previous such savvy,saga,gen2 n persona. not profitable in long run. so,they put out lot of effort on gcc,so that the next b sedan,supposed to replace saga,it will also cater the the gen2 n persona spot. meaning that,it will be a direct competitor with other b segment sedan,rather than just another cheap alternative to other b segments. instead just come out with many new cars, focusing on segments. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,027 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Ipoh |
gen2/persona are C segment actually, not really B segment if you ask me.
when I met one of the Perodua directors 2 months back, he mentioned it will be end of the year for new Viva and the news I received yesterday, is even months earlier. Perodua does worry of the GSC/GCC as during the monthly dealer briefing, the National Dealer Development head strongly emphasized on "rationalism" strategy to improve all branches/dealers corporate image, facilities so that their share of pie will not be stolen by Proton and any other manufacturers out there. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:17 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(allenultra @ Jun 20 2014, 10:04 AM) gen2/persona are C segment actually, not really B segment if you ask me. Yes, the truth is P1 and P2 doesn't differ much, although P2 fans will always try to say that P1 is poorer. I feel that the hate for P1 is due to the fact that it's the first national car maker and used to have brush-brush relationship with the federal government.when I met one of the Perodua directors 2 months back, he mentioned it will be end of the year for new Viva and the news I received yesterday, is even months earlier. Perodua does worry of the GSC/GCC as during the monthly dealer briefing, the National Dealer Development head strongly emphasized on "rationalism" strategy to improve all branches/dealers corporate image, facilities so that their share of pie will not be stolen by Proton and any other manufacturers out there. To deny that the GCC will eat into P2 sales would be naive. If priced at the same range, but GCC having a more complete safety package plus amazing driveability (Lotus assisted in the design afterall), I'm sure rational car buyers would definately favour the GCC over the existing P2 offerings, which in the direct sense, the myvi. All in all, I always see these as positive things to happen. To have competition amongst the car makers will only benefit us buyers in the long run. I mean, WHEN will P2 finally offer complete safety packages in their cars? Now with the GCC, perhaps this will happen sooner. So it's always good to have healthy competition and pressure for the car makers. This post has been edited by bananadriver: Jun 20 2014, 10:20 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,022 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama |
QUOTE(allenultra @ Jun 20 2014, 10:04 AM) gen2/persona are C segment actually, not really B segment if you ask me. Perodua AXIA is coming mah...Daihatsu Ayla. Not sure if it's VIVA or MAWI replacement.when I met one of the Perodua directors 2 months back, he mentioned it will be end of the year for new Viva and the news I received yesterday, is even months earlier. Perodua does worry of the GSC/GCC as during the monthly dealer briefing, the National Dealer Development head strongly emphasized on "rationalism" strategy to improve all branches/dealers corporate image, facilities so that their share of pie will not be stolen by Proton and any other manufacturers out there. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,022 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama |
QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 20 2014, 10:17 AM) Yes, the truth is P1 and P2 doesn't differ much, although P2 fans will always try to say that P1 is poorer. I feel that the hate for P1 is due to the fact that it's the first national car maker and used to have brush-brush relationship with the federal government. But P2 can't offer anything which Daihatsu doesn't....because they don't design cars...unless Daihatsu offers the same safety features, all P2 can do is more facelift to appease AhBeng market. To deny that the GCC will eat into P2 sales would be naive. If priced at the same range, but GCC having a more complete safety package plus amazing driveability (Lotus assisted in the design afterall), I'm sure rational car buyers would definately favour the GCC over the existing P2 offerings, which in the direct sense, the myvi. All in all, I always see these as positive things to happen. To have competition amongst the car makers will only benefit us buyers in the long run. I mean, WHEN will P2 finally offer complete safety packages in their cars? Now with the GCC, perhaps this will happen sooner. So it's always good to have healthy competition and pressure for the car makers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,345 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(mat79 @ Jun 20 2014, 09:57 AM) there r some a segment being benchmark models,but not viva or viva replacements of course. the gcc will cater the a n b segment for prtn. it wont be financially wise for prtn to come out with another a segment car.since the next b sedan segment will be based from gcc. c segment already have preve n suprima. the only thing left is d segment. there wont be too many b segments as previous such savvy,saga,gen2 n persona. not profitable in long run. so,they put out lot of effort on gcc,so that the next b sedan,supposed to replace saga,it will also cater the the gen2 n persona spot. meaning that,it will be a direct competitor with other b segment sedan,rather than just another cheap alternative to other b segments. instead just come out with many new cars, focusing on segments. QUOTE(allenultra @ Jun 20 2014, 10:04 AM) gen2/persona are C segment actually, not really B segment if you ask me. Although Gen2/Persona actually a C segment size during it launch, but the spec level is not really up to the segment. I always perceive the persona is B segment car with it prices. when I met one of the Perodua directors 2 months back, he mentioned it will be end of the year for new Viva and the news I received yesterday, is even months earlier. Perodua does worry of the GSC/GCC as during the monthly dealer briefing, the National Dealer Development head strongly emphasized on "rationalism" strategy to improve all branches/dealers corporate image, facilities so that their share of pie will not be stolen by Proton and any other manufacturers out there. Anyway it is good to know that Proton is eliminating A segment, and focus on GCC to fill both A and B compact cars segment. To do this, they must have lot of variants. I'm a bit worried that it will compromise safety equipments. Just hoping that the base variant will have at least 2 airbags and ESC. If not, Proton just putting their effort on emphasizing safety on their recent products back to drain. Because they can no longer advertise their product is best in safety in 1 product regardless variant, without much explanation on safety kits. B segment sedan (probably saga R), probably the first B segment global sedan for proton. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,345 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 20 2014, 10:24 AM) But P2 can't offer anything which Daihatsu doesn't....because they don't design cars...unless Daihatsu offers the same safety features, all P2 can do is more facelift to appease AhBeng market. I'm not sure i read somewhere that Perodua already had their RnD department (the real one), and will start operating in 2018. Well, at least can start with shared platform and engine. It took Proton 17 years after establishment to get their first in house product (Proton Waja). Perodua was establish in 1993, now is 2014 still no news about their own in house product. This post has been edited by ruffstuff: Jun 20 2014, 10:36 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:38 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 20 2014, 10:35 AM) I'm not sure i read somewhere that Perodua already had their RnD department (the real one), and will start operating in 2018. Well, at least can start with shared platform and engine. being the 2nd, younger child in the family grants immunities from harsh expectations usually.It took Proton 17 years after establishment to get their first in house product (Proton Waja). Perodua was establish in 1993, now is 2014 still no news about their own in house product. being the 2nd national car maker, and still being perceived as "young" has always been the excuse for P2. those who has younger brothers will understand |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,027 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Ipoh |
Btw, a news that I just remembered. The executive who I met yesterday mentioned that Perodua sedan will arrive next year.
Proton will need Saga replacement for that. |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:43 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(allenultra @ Jun 20 2014, 10:39 AM) Btw, a news that I just remembered. The executive who I met yesterday mentioned that Perodua sedan will arrive next year. probably going to be a hatchback converted into sedan type. Daihatsu likes to do this (so another Daihatsu model coming?) Recent examples would be Mitsubishi's mirage converted into the attrage. BTW is Perodua still selling that Perodua Nautica?Proton will need Saga replacement for that. Daihatsu Ayla sedan (photoshop pic) ![]() This post has been edited by bananadriver: Jun 20 2014, 11:28 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 10:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,345 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2014, 11:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,692 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Neither here nor there |
QUOTE(bananadriver @ Jun 20 2014, 10:43 AM) probably going to be a hatchback converted into sedan type. Daihatsu likes to do this (so another Daihatsu model coming?) Recent examples would be Mitsubishi's mirage converted into the attrage. BTW is Perodua still selling that Perodua Nautica? They stopped selling Nautica since Toyota bring in Rush. To be honest, car buyers don't care about AWD, all they want is cheaper prices, thus causing the Nautica sales to plummet drastically. |
| Change to: | 0.0261sec
0.59
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 01:10 PM |