QUOTE(RED-HAIR-SHANKS @ Jan 29 2015, 10:06 PM)
Thank you so much! Both of you have done a great job in clearing my doubts away. I will treat them as my primary guidelines when it comes to graph drawing in PA. Oh, just another question here. Is it safe to simply assume that the word ''menjadi'' and ''kepada'' in the petikan means the exact jumlah for something?
For example
''Nilai eksport buah-buahan pada tahun sebelumnya mengalami peningkatan sebanyak 2.3%, atau RM 25 juta kepada RM 310 juta pada tahun 2012.''
-So, is it safe to right away tabulate RM 310 juta for the category of eksport buah-buahan in year 2012?
I ask this because after I did a few practices, I realised that there were same keywords in the petikan that refers to the exact value for any category in any given year.
It's hard to conclude without a proper context, but I think it is a yes. Menjadi means become, and therefore when it says menjadi RM310 it means become RM310. For example
''Nilai eksport buah-buahan pada tahun sebelumnya mengalami peningkatan sebanyak 2.3%, atau RM 25 juta kepada RM 310 juta pada tahun 2012.''
-So, is it safe to right away tabulate RM 310 juta for the category of eksport buah-buahan in year 2012?
I ask this because after I did a few practices, I realised that there were same keywords in the petikan that refers to the exact value for any category in any given year.
You are most welcome though. Graph is really interesting and the only fun thing you have in sem 2 PA (dasar sucks).
Jan 29 2015, 10:21 PM

Quote

, show that
.


.
into the parentheses, or by using product rule. But, I've done it using both said methods and I still couldn't prove the equation albeit going through a lot of steps. The thing here is that you have to know which is the simplest method that you can execute in order to arrive at the correct solution.
0.0320sec
1.09
6 queries
GZIP Disabled