QUOTE(sniper msia @ Jul 21 2006, 10:27 PM)
Sorry if my explanation isn't that good. 
What i mean to say was, pictures taken with a digicam always look their worst at 100% crop. So if let's say we have 2 equivalent digicams. One with a 3.2MP sensor and another with a 2MP sensor. The images that you see (let's say a cropped part at 100% like what you did) would turn out usually not as nice on the 3.2MP-produced picture as compared to the 2MP-produced picture. Because u need to crop 'more' on the 3.2MP picture as compared to the 2MP picture which is smaller overall.
I'm not sure if this really matters or not. Just my opinion.
well, i'm not so sure of that, but i wasn't comparing which is nice or not, was just focusing that cropped @ the same area, k800 can't capture the details. if u say that a cropped 3.2mp pic will alwiz be worse than one on a 2mp, thn just compare the 903sh n k800, both also @ 3.2mp reso, rite? lol What i mean to say was, pictures taken with a digicam always look their worst at 100% crop. So if let's say we have 2 equivalent digicams. One with a 3.2MP sensor and another with a 2MP sensor. The images that you see (let's say a cropped part at 100% like what you did) would turn out usually not as nice on the 3.2MP-produced picture as compared to the 2MP-produced picture. Because u need to crop 'more' on the 3.2MP picture as compared to the 2MP picture which is smaller overall.
I'm not sure if this really matters or not. Just my opinion.
pls correct me if i'm wrong
Jul 21 2006, 10:33 PM

Quote

0.0278sec
0.70
6 queries
GZIP Disabled