Whre malaysia self propelled artillery? So kesian sampai now tak ada
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
Military Thread V12, 31/8 Merdeka; 16/9 Malaysia Day
|
|
Jul 5 2014, 07:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Whre malaysia self propelled artillery? So kesian sampai now tak ada
|
|
|
Jul 10 2014, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(edwardstevens @ Jul 10 2014, 09:16 AM) deployed more often to SEA if that your rumored "pinjam"If pinjam for evaluation, that would be totally baseless f22 is permanent shut for production, no way USA will open production. Even so, our history of small purchases just not worth open a production line again IF PAK FA, then yes could be a very true rumors. I heard Russian even invite us to join in the development. QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Jul 10 2014, 09:30 PM) they would prefer SG compared to Malaysia if based facilities alone |
|
|
Jul 10 2014, 11:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 11 2014, 11:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(LTZ @ Jul 11 2014, 11:33 AM) Kat somalia US cakap besar...komplen kata condor tu standard mcm trak yg letak guni pasir je sbg protection. Tp lepas kes bakara market la....masa kena ambush semua ikut je. Nk harap humvee lg la.... afgan and iraq pun sama... masuk humvee.. kena boom now hardly any humve |
|
|
Jul 11 2014, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2014, 06:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 01:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
wow.. if it is russian who shot it down
this could be one hell of diplomatic problem, we are user of Russian equipments. Most likely sure will have effect of future procurement USA will be smiling all the way, contract coming soon This post has been edited by thpace: Jul 18 2014, 01:12 AM |
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 01:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
the interesting part
how malaysia going to response? Both US and Russia are good malaysia partner |
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(terminator2 @ Jul 18 2014, 02:25 AM) agree with u 100% i guess u are pretty outdatedUSA interests in msia wont climb too far due to few factors: 1_ SG ( their little beloved baby and their weapon factory to middle east via Saudi ) USA got a a big trust in SG due to many reasons (safe , far from Indon,thai,pinoyland) 2_ religion : in MSIA there is a vibe of extremism in some people including some PAS supporters , so the last thing US wants is to face such a dilema MSIA/USA bonding wont exceed fake smiles and easy tourism relationships do note US and malaysia have quite close military relationship. can see through various military training Sincerely, USA relationship with SG and Malaysia are pretty much similar, just SG got extra goodies to offer (economy and money power as well lack of extremism) SG relation with Isreal is the most significant. |
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(terminator2 @ Jul 18 2014, 02:38 AM) you are partially right f22 is minor? Even SG didnt get or any nearby SEA allies get to train with f22but this minor training are just to put some ash on the table and to convince people like you that there is some action going on .. you are 100% wrong when u say USA/SG = USA/MY relationship . anyway i have no mood for long talk and quarreling.. go investigate how Israel and SG relationship give them the best bucks Then u know why i say SG/USA and MY/USA, is pretty much similar just SG got the best relation with out of the best technology supplier |
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 02:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 08:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 20 2014, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Jul 20 2014, 11:49 AM) If twin engine and come with two seater variant, I am sure our airforce will be interestedBeing Korean made, at least quality n maintenance wont be much of an issue |
|
|
Jul 20 2014, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Jul 20 2014, 03:13 PM) not necessary.. give the level of defense in SEA, it will be a very very very long time before anyone will adopt stealth as their main air force machine. Our main will still be our beloved su-35 our f18 will also soon face retirement, following our air force love for twin engine and seater, this is quite a good candidate for replacement. If stealth is the main priority, PAK FA is the favorite it already have twin engine and possible two seat variant. F35 is almost out of the question i do understand our air force love for twin engine since if one engine fail, the aircraft can still fly to land safely. Understandable since we have limited number and every one is important. But i cant understand the need for two seater? anyone care to explain? This post has been edited by thpace: Jul 20 2014, 11:00 PM |
|
|
Jul 21 2014, 01:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0570sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 07:44 PM |