Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

259 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Edifier Fan Club V7, A Passion For Sound

views
     
FaezFarhan
post Aug 2 2015, 06:02 AM

United till I die!
*******
Senior Member
3,435 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kota Bharu



QUOTE(power911 @ Aug 1 2015, 11:40 PM)
nails could work only if the head is fat enough to hold the lugs (sometimes I recommend screws but nah they scratch things up badly)

you might need speaker brackets so you can position the speaker to face you. sweat.gif
*
I see, where can I find the brackets?
DreamScars
post Aug 3 2015, 11:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Meow City


Hello guys, may i know what are the differences SQ wise between Edifier:

R1600TIII
R1700BT
R1800TIII

because they are priced closely to each another.

I have been using edifier e3100 since 2008, would it be a nice/noticeable/big upgrade from it if i bought any of these? thanks smile.gif

and i'll be listening to 80% of rock, various types of metal, ballads and 20% other genres so i don't really need that much bass.

posted at the v5 thread earlier didn't noticed that there's already v7 sweat.gif

This post has been edited by DreamScars: Aug 3 2015, 11:17 PM
TSEdifier
post Aug 4 2015, 11:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


If budget allow, try the R1800TIII>

DreamScars
post Aug 4 2015, 11:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Meow City


QUOTE(Edifier @ Aug 4 2015, 11:33 AM)
If budget allow, try the R1800TIII>
*
okay, any particular reason why you recommend it over r1600tiii? thanks. smile.gif
TSEdifier
post Aug 4 2015, 12:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


QUOTE(DreamScars @ Aug 4 2015, 11:36 AM)
okay, any particular reason why you recommend it over r1600tiii? thanks.  smile.gif
*
Because R1800TIII better than R1600TIII smile.gif

This post has been edited by Edifier: Aug 4 2015, 12:42 PM
DreamScars
post Aug 4 2015, 02:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Meow City


QUOTE(Edifier @ Aug 4 2015, 12:38 PM)
Because R1800TIII better than R1600TIII smile.gif
*
okay thanks, will audition both if i have the chance smile.gif
izaydi
post Aug 4 2015, 11:36 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
553 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


can anyone suggest me good book shelf speaker price around 200 -300
TSEdifier
post Aug 5 2015, 11:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


QUOTE(izaydi @ Aug 4 2015, 11:36 PM)
can anyone suggest me good book shelf speaker price around 200 -300
*
For budget around RM300, you can give R1280T a try.
TSEdifier
post Aug 6 2015, 11:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


Edifier C3X 2.1 Speaker Sound Test (Music, Animation, Movie)








This post has been edited by Edifier: Aug 6 2015, 11:01 AM
am3
post Aug 8 2015, 03:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,352 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
What is better for music listening, the 2.0 or 2.1 speaker? I'm not a basshead.

And it seems th r1700bt model more expensive than r18000tiii.
Does it really differ much in sound quality? Should I go for the the r1700bt model or just get the r1800tiii and buy a cheap bluetooth receiver?


FaezFarhan
post Aug 9 2015, 11:00 AM

United till I die!
*******
Senior Member
3,435 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Kota Bharu



Repairing my Edifier S730D cost me Rm68. Not bad I suppose. He told me something was loose inside and some other stuff he didn't specifically told me. Now it's working wonders again. Definitely my fav speaker.


Cosef
post Aug 9 2015, 04:48 PM

Kampung Style
*******
Senior Member
2,293 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Sarawak


QUOTE(am3 @ Aug 8 2015, 03:51 PM)
What is better for music listening, the 2.0 or 2.1 speaker? I'm not a basshead.

And it seems th r1700bt model more expensive than r18000tiii.
Does it really differ much in sound quality? Should I go for the the r1700bt model or just get the r1800tiii and buy a cheap bluetooth receiver?
*
Usually 2.0 would be better for music listening for much easier to get balanced overall soundings.
2.1 speaker do sound good, just the matter of sub integration needs a little careful, like positions and volume.

For R1700BT and R1800TIII would be better you audit yourself, but do take note does the volume control position will bother you or not.
am3
post Aug 10 2015, 08:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,352 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(Cosef @ Aug 9 2015, 04:48 PM)
Usually 2.0 would be better for music listening for much easier to get balanced overall soundings.
2.1 speaker do sound good, just the matter of sub integration needs a little careful, like positions and volume.

For R1700BT and R1800TIII would be better you audit yourself, but do take note does the volume control position will bother you or not.
*
Thanks. I think maybe going for 2.0 for better stereo as 2.1 the sub woofer is mono.



lol4291
post Aug 11 2015, 11:07 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
For movies, series, anime, gaming (80%) + music (20%), which setup would be good, a 2.0 or 2.1? Budget around RM200. Max RM300. Want to keep budget as minimum as possible.

Prefer to have to some kind of remote/ controller to control the volume.
If possible to have multiple input, would help as well.
Frequency response or RMS power is important?

The last speaker i owned was Altec Lansing ATP3 (bought in 2001, now rosak already, already disposed sad.gif )
TSEdifier
post Aug 12 2015, 08:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


Thought all Bluetooth speakers were the same? Edifier Luna Eclipse – Review

http://www.coolsmartphone.com/2014/05/20/t...eclipse-review/
am3
post Aug 12 2015, 08:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,352 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
Edifier bookshelf speaker don't have headphone out?
which got?
calamity88
post Aug 18 2015, 07:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
any major difference between m3200 and m3250? cant seem to find much review/video on m3250
TSEdifier
post Aug 18 2015, 09:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


QUOTE(am3 @ Aug 12 2015, 08:55 PM)
Edifier bookshelf speaker don't have headphone out?
which got?
*
Yes, all the Edifier bookshelf don't have headphone out.

am3
post Aug 19 2015, 02:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,352 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
QUOTE(Edifier @ Aug 18 2015, 09:59 PM)
Yes, all the Edifier bookshelf don't have headphone out.
*
the c2x c3 model have headphone out right?

On thus website says m1360 got bluetooth. Wrong info in edifier site?
http://www.edifier.com/my/en/speakers/m1360-2.1-computer

This post has been edited by am3: Aug 19 2015, 02:48 PM
TSEdifier
post Aug 19 2015, 02:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Store Representative
9,142 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Edifier, Stax, Noctua and AirPulse


QUOTE(am3 @ Aug 19 2015, 02:47 PM)
the c2x c3 model have headphone out right?

On thus website says m1360 got bluetooth. Wrong info in edifier site?
http://www.edifier.com/my/en/speakers/m1360-2.1-computer
*
C2X and C3X have head[hone out.

Thanks for the info, already inform designer to change the spec of M1360 asap.

259 Pages « < 24 25 26 27 28 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0290sec    0.35    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 06:22 PM