QUOTE(ngaisteve1 @ Oct 10 2014, 10:54 PM)
I would prefer to focus on what the bible says. I don't think I should comment on what other church is going.
maybe you can tell me your point for your no 1 and 2. I'm ok with direct point
Sorry for the late reply. Never knew you replied the post.
Ya. We should focus on what the Bible says. Not sure what you meant by other church? Aren't we all of the same church?
1) When you read the book of Acts, consider the beginning, through the end .... what was the difference?
Well, you will realize that there is a dispensational transfer happening right in the book of Acts. The disciples are in a transition, since they were raised in the Old Testament dispensation, and they had been saturated with and even constituted of God’s Old Testament arrangement. As a result, it was very difficult for them to forsake those things in an absolute way to God's New Testament dispensation.
For example, at the beginning, they [the disciples] cast lots (a very Old Testament practice) yet the Spirit is tolerant of it and affirm it. They should be ones who lived by the leading of the Spirit.
Let us take the case of Peter as an illustration. Peter was chosen by the Lord and used by Him to carry out His New Testament economy after He Himself had accomplished the transfer. Peter, however, was saturated with and constituted of the things of the old dispensation. For this reason, when Peter saw the vision of the great sheet in which were four-footed animals, reptiles, and birds, and when a voice told him to rise up, slay, and eat, Peter said, “By no means, Lord, for I have never eaten anything common and unclean” (10:14). Knowing what the situation would be the Lord had sent an angel to Cornelius with a word concerning Peter. Furthermore, “while Peter was pondering concerning the vision, the Spirit said to him, Behold, three men are seeking you. But rise up and go down and go with them, doubting nothing, because I have sent them” (10:19-20). Peter loved the Lord, and eventually he went to the house of Cornelius. But this was a very difficult thing for Peter to do.
It is the same with miracles. There is a transition.
Chapters twenty-seven and twenty-eight of Acts do not present anything of doctrine. Rather, in these chapters we have a record of a man living Christ to the uttermost. Paul was imprisoned, bound in chains, and surrounded by guards. The sea was very stormy, and the sailing was rough. Furthermore, Paul was away from his homeland and from most of his friends. Although he was in such a difficult situation, he lived like a reigning king.
Here in Acts 27 and 28, Paul lived Christ in a situation that was altogether contrary to his culture and character. Many things were disappointing and discouraging, but Paul nevertheless lived a life of the highest standard. In Paul the wonderful, excellent, and mysterious God-man, who lived in the Gospels, continued to live through one of His many members. This was Jesus living again on earth in His divinely enriched humanity. Paul’s living, therefore, was a repetition of the living of Jesus.
This is the New Testament economy. Eventually, Paul's epistles (mostly written in prison) will develop that point, in which, we come to 2).
2) Paul's experience in Philippines, 2 Cor (of which one verse you quoted) and his advice with Timothy
(Lazy) This verse, Phil. 1:21 do encapsulate Paul's experience: "For to me to live is Christ". As always, even now Christ shall be magnified in my body, whether through life or through death” (Phil. 1:20).
With revelation we will see that the miracles were done to signify something deeper about life. Miracles are not the goal. The apostle Paul did many miracles, but he did not heal himself or his co-workers Timothy and Trophimus (Acts 19:11-12; 1 Tim. 5:23; 2 Tim. 4:20). Paul had a thorn in his flesh, which was a physical sickness (2 Cor. 12:7). After he asked the Lord three times that it would depart, the Lord said, “My grace is sufficient for you” (vv. 8-9). Grace is Christ Himself as life experienced by us.
It is significant that Paul does not tell Timothy to pursue power, gifts, miracles, and theological training. Rather, he charges Timothy to pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance, and meekness. Righteousness is a matter of being right with people before God according to God’s righteous and strict requirements.
In the second place, he should pursue godliness, the expression of God. In 4:7 Paul told Timothy to exercise himself unto godliness. Or a man of God. He should pursue righteousness and godliness; he should seek to be right with God and man in order to be a living expression of God in every way. This is to live a daily life which manifests God. God’s desire is to produce men of God by dispensing Himself into those who believe in Christ. A man of God is one who partakes of God’s life and nature (John 1:13; 2 Pet. 1:4) and thus becomes one with Him in His life and nature (1 Cor. 6:17) and thereby expresses Him. This corresponds to the mystery of godliness, which is God manifest in the flesh (1 Tim. 3:16).
This post has been edited by pehkay: Oct 15 2014, 09:39 AM