QUOTE(davidke20 @ Nov 13 2014, 09:12 PM)
bery soon will be moving to q sentral, or probably I'll choose Seremban branch again. Time of travel are the same anyways 
LOL LDP jam2 hours of manual transmission...
Proton Savvy LYN Club V5, The survival skills
|
|
Nov 13 2014, 09:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2014, 10:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2014, 11:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Nov 25 2014, 11:53 AM) Can tell here, no big issue anyways. Was originally an appointed admin in FB group by Adryan. Original intention was to keep everyone up to date real time instead of LYN slowpoke. Was posting & making new friends off & on. After a while, more & more non-LYN member joined the group. More post, more update. Things getting hard to keep up. Replying technical has gotten me handful. Either I don't reply, otherwise will make sure be the quality 1s. That's my style. sorry to hear that bro.Out of boringness, was trying to poke fun like usual. As an admin, I admit I made a mistake for not identifying the poster was female(which probably just browse through FB searching for technical assistance for this 1 time only), with tagging her male friend in the post. The male friend replied to me as a senile ******* that admin should get rid off due to my vulgar comment. I have removed my last reply, made a comment to apologize for my misbehaviour. Removed some TT pictures that's not supposed to be on the profile. Left a good bye note and left the group for good. Regardless, maintaining the page no longer fun for me. At least being a TS here in LYN made me feel like I have the RESPONSIBILITY to take care of our community. I supposed those who heartedly wanted to get along with fellow Shawie owners will come back LYN here & continue our friendship here. and yea agree on the bolded; Things will definitely work out |
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Nov 28 2014, 09:06 AM) I shall practice a few tip from this person & my Shawie shall be long live. I strongly suggest fellow AMT owner to take these advice as well. that's what i've been practicing on ALL the cars i maintain since i started to pick up interest in cars since 2009 lol.preventive maintenance |
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 03:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Nov 28 2014, 03:20 PM) As Iska said aiya sayang car ma...It's only a same different story. Using fully synthetic expansive oil and drag it until 25k km until oil change, has not much differnece than using mineral oil like the unker I met, drag until 10k km. The only difference is, sohem Quazacolt uses a so much more expansive synthetic oil that he's confident enough it will not harm his engine, sumoar with lab test proven result on acidic level after oil being used extensively. BUT, he will never dare to put mineral oil in his car, not to mention drag for 10k km service interval. As for lab test, I don't have 1 for that unker's Shawie, other than my butt dyno result Technically, Quazacolt is not many different. The different is, the unker make use of so little investment to up keep the car, whereas Quazacolt had to spend more some more don't say mineral EO, semi syn also last like 4-6k km ady feeling sluggish... maybe how i torture the engine also plays a role la so for peace of mind, and able to cope with my usage, go for something that's sure-fire work, albeit pay the price lo. still better than me blowing the engine up right? lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 03:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(NOX @ Nov 28 2014, 03:41 PM) damn nice sharing bro david. i'm thankful on people that are generous/sharing on knowledge.glad u spill it all out here. sometimes people tend to keep the best knowledge for themself. i barely cant follow half of the tips. mayb for DIY guy like you, easy thing to do eh. can sapu tesco mineral oil for next service la macam ini. running on HDEO for 3000km, so far so gooding. that's how we can progress as a whole/community. btw i also not DIY guy ma, also can do preventive maintenance punya also if you want to sapu tesco oil, can consider Shell full symthetic with pureplus made from natural gas. ![]() on the same note, Giant selling the same thing for the same price (or maybe rm10-20 more expensive?) but with 5 liter bottle. i can trust tesco to have genuine parallel imported Shell la, Giant not so sure lol, but it's cheap nonetheless. personally not going for it since Malaysia not bringing in 0w20 viscosity and i'm an advocate on thin viscosity EO |
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 06:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 06:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2014, 06:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2014, 01:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 09:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 10:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 12 2014, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Dec 12 2014, 09:51 AM) Advantages to get 13 on Shawie/GaGa fully agree with sifuPower delivery more emphasized on low/mid range Braking performance at optimal Ease on suspension Better ride and handling due to light weight Cheaper rubber in comparison with the same range of all season tyres Better fuel economy Ease on steering action. Smaller turning radius required for the same angle/corner Disadvantages to utilize 13 Losing top speed Little choice of performance rubbers, even if there is, the price will be much expansive compare to a bigger or common size performance rubbers Lower undercarriage clearance Will not be able to accommodate bigger brake calipers/discs Difficult to match offset(usually will automatically become INSET when downsize from original bigger wheels) Less water channel and cutting due to less tyre width 1 thing must understand, wheel itself is UNSPRUNG weight, hence it will greatly affect ROLL CENTRE balance. Big wheels + lowered does not settle the actual lateral G force. General consensus has been wrong all these while where people think lowering the vehicle height (sprung weight - anything above the spring) has been giving a wrong perception of FEELING stable but the car will be throwing a lot of lateral G-Force and strain the actual tyre traction. This topic will put into a huge "discussion"( or can call it debate as very little will accept the fact that lowering a car doesn't help much on reducing roll), so I'll keep this HANDLING topic for a special thread whenever needs. that's why rcs generally kept stock height and at most lower maybe 1 cm or 2 at most and that's in according to the chassis geometry (remember the car originally had 17/18", not 16" lol) |
|
|
Dec 12 2014, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Dec 12 2014, 03:07 PM) Now, the truth is a smaller wheel diameter will result in even lower roll centre and lighter unsprung weight got touch up... cheaper apm spring and local kyb (not japan kyb) absorbers.thinner rear ARB, and that's it. the aim is more comfort, however as an overall package, it > the real lancer and has been reviewed as such by various magazines and what not. supposedly, if the rear arb is thinner, it would be having less oversteer characteristics... and that itself is a +point for majority of drivers, regardless how they may think/believe (remember that suspension thread you linked? that alone could have played a huge factor in the outcome of that performance aside, the suspension is dirt cheap for sure... refer my thread, no one wants LOL |
|
|
Dec 13 2014, 06:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(e-lite @ Dec 13 2014, 05:08 PM) Quazacolt, do u know of a 1.8 inspira covert engine to a 2.4 lancer. That seems like a perfect daily car Already converted I don't think I know (or know well /personally) I know at least got 1 or 2 converting, work in progress Also know got few did full evo x convert, with full s awc /all wheel drive |
|
|
Dec 13 2014, 06:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2014, 10:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Dec 16 2014, 09:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Dec 16 2014, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
| Change to: | 0.0270sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 11:39 AM |