depends lo... did u mean S+?
honda using cvt have advantage of lower cost to play compare with 4at which sound old but actually more expensive,
and they make door visor, boot tray etc as optional accessories for all model, we have it all even at lowest spec,
except highest spec, city all using 175/65 tyre, vios use 185/60. and i think our J seat have better quality fabric compare with city, city seat feels like saga the fabric loose loose dei, especially sit at back look at front seat's rear.
from just few thing above honda atleast have thousand more cost budget to play at other place.
for high spec, i wouldn't say vios is overprice too, what toyota offer which honda doesn't aren't cheap at all, just they totally aim at wrong place, honda cleverly hit all their arrow at bull-eyes.
for low spec, honda need to remove even alloy rim to make a little cheaper than vios (or same price after vios discount), so i guess they tried their best at really tight "reasonable profit" already.
Agreed .
Having drove vios G model and city E model, I still felt vios have a better overall interior. While the exterior vios had a 100% change , the city had a 70% change. At glimpse from certain angle, some may have thought the new city was the previous generation city. Though, the overall champion is still the city due to features at its very competitive price.