Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Car Tint Advice - V2, Raytech, Vkool, Huper Optic, 3M or .....

views
     
kirakun
post Jan 27 2024, 10:57 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Jan 27 2024, 05:07 PM)
Thanks for the information. Say if durability or short life span of the cheap tint is not a factor, performance-wise the cheap tint won't affect the heat rejection performance of the expensive tiny but slightly improve it. Will this be the case?
*
Performance wise lower vlt naturally will reduce the emission of infrared ray thus increase the heat rejection capacity. Number of tint layers not a factor but rather the overall ray filter from the tint or tints will determine how cool the cabin will be in a hot sunny day.
kirakun
post Jan 29 2024, 10:13 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(dev/numb @ Jan 29 2024, 06:49 PM)
UV block 100% means very little (almost nothing actually) when it comes to the heat coming into the car, because the ultraviolet spectrum is a very small part of the full spectrum of light. 100% UV blocking will only be 1% more resistant at delaying the yellowing of your interior plastics over the years compared to 99% UV blocking brands, nothing more. Only the k-pop skin whitening crowd will fall for that marketing.

What you need to look at is IRR. Our weather, bare minimum should be 95%@1400nm (for sputter types). The “TSER up to 78%” claim is also a gimmick. The words “up to” are the clue here. It means you will only get 78% TSER if you choose the darkest VLT 10% film.

If you want go dark (means JPJ non-compliant) to make your car cool, you can get film for under RM1k easily with higher IRR rating than IrisPro’s entry level UV Pro series.
*
Well said. Marketing gimmick nowadays mean have to read every single word available and digest carefully before falling for it biggrin.gif .
kirakun
post Jan 29 2024, 10:24 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(bee88 @ Jan 29 2024, 11:56 AM)
Just wondering should I go for unbranded highest spec paper at a local tint shop. One whole car hatchback is only rm450.

What are the problem thst I might occur with the unbranded paper? The store offer 5 y warranty though.
*
Better check how long has the store been around and any review/feedbacks from the cap ayam tint. Worst cast scenarios:-

1. Tint gone bad within a year or 2 and require replacement. Replacement may also only last a year or 2. Time wasted to send for replacement and the cycle repeat.
2. Tint gone bad and tint no longer in production, store will replace with another cap ayam tint which may also gone bad within a year or two. Time wasted to send for replacement and the cycle repeat.
3. Tint gone bad and store no longer around. Time and $$$ wasted for replacement.
4. Tint's heat rejection capacity drop drastically within a year or 2. Time wasted to send for replacement and the cycle repeat.
kirakun
post Jan 29 2024, 11:29 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Jan 29 2024, 11:18 PM)
I'm not sure if one can even trust the IRR numbers published by some tint manufacturers unless it's a reputable or trustable tint company and the IRR measured by a device. Most good tints such as V-kool have the IRR in the range of 94% to 98% with Elite to V-Kool 10. I just noticed that with Totalgard which I've installed on my car several months ago, the IRR range is consistent between 98% to 100% even with the lowest performing tint Infusion Pro 65 N8 installed on my front windscreen with VLT 63%. The IRR of 98% on the front wind screen of my car actually feels very bad, close to no tint. As a matter of fact the V-kool Elite with IRR 94% on my old car feels much cooler.

user posted image

I've been given the spec below but I'm not sure if I can trust the real world performance of it, judging from the dismal quality of the Totalgard Infusion Pro with almost perfect IRR values which do not correlate to real world experience.

Front windscreen
1) Irr 95%  rm830
2) Irr 88% rm680
3) Irr 75% rm580
4) Irr 65% rm380
*
Another question to ponder, are u keeping the car for more than 5 to 7 years? If yes, go for V-kool series. Previous car with V-kool tint for almost 10 years before sold and the tint was still as good as new. Only the heat rejection capacity had somewhat reduced throughout the years but still better than those cap ayam tints.
kirakun
post Jan 30 2024, 01:48 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Cavino @ Jan 30 2024, 08:15 AM)
The thing is can we afford the VKool series that have double the price vs 10 years ago? It is the best clear tint but the price also drastically priced out of budget for most ppl liao.
*
Not sure where u got the double price from. But v-kool’s price has always been high all the while even 10 years ago. My previous car a SUV tinted with v-kool elite FWS mixed with other lower VLT series for the rest of the windows already cost around 4k that time.

Of course on affordability, v-kool is among the least affordable but well u get what u pay for.
kirakun
post Jan 30 2024, 02:05 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Cavino @ Jan 30 2024, 02:00 PM)
Coz I install 2.4K VKool Elite on another City about 12 years ago. Last year, I ask HQ for VKool Elite got about 3.8 to 4.2K, can't remember exactly but Sporthandling just say he get quoted 2.8K.

Did I mixed up the pricing?? coz even the website also showing 3950 min. pricing for VKool Elite.
*
Current price of v-kool for a suv would be around 5k. There is an increase definitely but not to the extent of double. Anyway elite series for the whole car is cheaper compared to the mixed series. The downside, interior would be like “too bright” and no privacy.
kirakun
post Jan 30 2024, 02:19 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Jan 30 2024, 02:15 PM)
The "free tint" which is Ice Cool actually costs RM2.2k which I have paid. So much for "free" tint.
*
That sucks bad. If option is available might as well get v-kool elite and just top up 600. Ice cool practically is cap ayam.


kirakun
post Jan 30 2024, 07:43 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Jan 30 2024, 07:22 PM)
Even if there's a poll, it's very difficult. I have Totalgard Infusion Pro on my car but use the highest VLT (63%) on the FWS (which translates to worst heat rejection performance) & side front windscreens. There are people who use the same tint but with lower VLT on FWS so the result or experience will not be the same although the brand is the same. Also, within the brand there are other range of tint such as Ceramic Plus and Titanium Plus apart from Infusion Pro.

As I have posted earlier, in my experience the Totalgard Infusion Pro has the worst performance in terms of heat rejection and I do not recommend it. The only good thing going for it is the low price, 599 for whole car. There may be a difference but it is minimal to me especially with the front and side front windscreens where the highest VLT were selected. Huper Optik Sech60 and C40 combination is noticeably better at about RM1.6k which is close to 3X more. The V-Kool Elite has the best performance.

I will share my review on Ice Cool and Cool Gard tints when I have the opportunity. Ice Cool 2 layers all round and Cool Gard top spec tint for FWS.
*
Keep us posted and best of luck.
kirakun
post Feb 2 2024, 02:47 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(rellik_yzarc @ Feb 1 2024, 03:21 PM)
I'm buying an Innova Zenix and asked the salesperson to recommend tint.

The salesperson from M-Pro called me. During the call she mentioned that tinting in the wrong way can void warranty.

Questions:
1. Can tinting void warranty of the car?
2. How good is M-Pro? (I haven't heard of this brand before today)
3. Please recommend some tints for me. Looking to comply with JPJ but minimize VLT
*
Personally never heard of “m-pro” tint and tinting will void warranty lol. 3rd party tint that is installed over the factory tint/2nd layer tint will only void the warranty of the original tint that comes with the car.

There are many reputable tint brands in the market. V-kool, solargard, 3m, Llumar, Huper Optik to name a few. Do survey around before decide.
kirakun
post Oct 4 2024, 04:51 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(propusers @ Oct 3 2024, 11:22 AM)
just notice my Raytech car tint warranty card stated that "Rear windscreen heater no warranty". Is it normal to Raytech? 3M and Vkool also has same warranty terms?
*
Depend on condition of the tint and what caused the tint to have bubbles in the 1st place. If the bubbles happened due to defective material or poor workmanship then most likely you can claim for replacement tint. However if the bubbles are around the heat demister lines, most likely the dealer will reject your claim based on the ground that it is user's own mistake that caused the damage/bubbles to the tint.

General info - the rear heat demister lines will damage the tint and cause bubbles if you turn it on for too long or forget to turn it off. Many are not aware.
kirakun
post May 29 2025, 02:52 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(19 Degree South @ May 29 2025, 10:59 AM)
not sure bro. i have seen so many ppl said black beauty series good  so i try lor. mana tau so lousy one. maybe their diamond series is better in performance.  my previous tint of Huper optik and vkool  40. hardly feel any heat on my arms while driving under the sun.
*
Diamond 11 may be slightly better but not worth the price tag. Personally i would go for others like 3m or HO if given another chance to choose. 1st 2 years heat rejection pretty good however 3rd year onward heat rejection down the drain unlike v-kool elite which were still good even after 7 years. Currently using and only 3 years plus already color faded a lot and heat rejection down substantially even though car is parked in shade daily. Warranty given is 7 years but claiming will be like chasing dream with tons of excuses so make your choice of tint wisely.
kirakun
post Aug 17 2025, 02:00 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
697 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(yurie @ Aug 16 2025, 07:15 PM)
Do old cars like Wira or Kancil absorb more heat than newer cars because I find that on a hot sunny day after switching off the car the heat radiates out from all sides of the car and it feels like a convection oven inside makes you want to exit the car ASAP. Where as I don't find newer cars being so heat radiating despite non tinted. Does tinting old vehicles benefits much if this case?
*
Tints are for the windows, FWS, RWS and for some sunroof and/or panoramic roof only. The composition of car body structure is of different aspect. That said, newer cars do come with better technology and design crafted into the car body which of course will reduce heat radiating from outside as well as with plenty of heat insulation material embedded.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0290sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 06:56 PM