With exception to V-Kool because it is metalized based film which I agree on higher TSER. V-kool brand has been in the market long enough and my apologies for forgetting to exclude V-kool in my rant and explanation.

I believe those who installed original V-kool has never had any complains on the tint at all, except for GPS and SmartTag. Do correct me if I'm wrong.

My dad's V-kool is 10 years old and still going on strong. Only problem is the GPS lock-on. Quite a bit of discoloration but nothing to complain if a product works as advertised for 10 years. Being protected from hot sun for RM1 a day for 10 years, what is there to complain.

Cheers.

So that's how you treat your customer. Name calling me and ask me don't simply comment when I'm not a satisfied customer? Good service.

No thank you. I already replace the tint with another brand that I am happy with. No need to complain anymore.

Good luck with your business.

jpj will not saman u on the spot. they will issue letter to ask u go for inspection in one of the JPJ office. U need to tear off all the tint and go for inspection with no tint. Then after that they will issue you a letter of clearance, then u can go back to tint shop and tint again

If you ignore the letter to go for inspection, most likely they will blacklist you car and not sure if can renew roadtax after that

i have no experience with police kacau tint.

Quite good deal.

Recommend C60 for front as 70 is very bad in heat rejection and it will overall affect the cooling abilities since the heat keeps coming in from the front. It's quite glaring too in a hot afternoon.

Still better than a 10 year warranty tint

I'm using RX previously and I can say it ain't top performance at all. Feels like oven and very uncomfortable to drive in the afternoon.

It left a very bitter taste for me after all those impressive paper tser spec. Ain't recommending it to my family or friends.

You must be driving some expensive car that comes with some heat rejection glass already. Mine doesn't come with it, u can feel the difference. I know cause I was using Raytech, then i switched over to HO.

I don't want to go do the test because it doesn't make a difference for me:

1. After a week of Raytech, have concluded that it cannot be deteriorated so fast.
2. Had the cheek to tell me to top up $$$ to add more layers of tint as if I paid 2k+ for the highest grade for nothing if i am not satisfied with the performance of the film.
3. Even if they make a loss and re-tint the whole car for me, i am still not happy with the performance of the tint since it doesn't make a difference cos it's still hot and very uncomfortable.
4. A very butthurt seller reported my unsatisfactory post about Raytech, can roughly guess is who. You try to silence customer disatisfaction by reporting the post?


Instead of wasting my time and my money, I just go with another brand. Why i said personal preference is this, I did 2 cars at the same time.

One car I installed highest range full RX and front U70.

Another one I did only the front, driver and front passenger with FX. The back is still HO. This is because I wanted to sell the car, need to remove the tint and do puspakom inspection, the back one they usually do not disturb it. In the end I did not manage to sell it because wife would like keep the car for NCD purposes. You are welcome to come and test out and let me know if I am lying. The HO is installed for more than 5 years a the back.


After a week, i can tell you that sitting at the back is much more comfortable than at the front. My conclusion, I paid 3K+ for both cars at ONE GO. And both disappointed me.


So there is no need to tell me go test it out because no matter how they test it or replace it, it is not up to my expectation. You don't keep beating a dead horse. And HO cost me less than 2K and i'm glad to report that although it's a painful price i paid, I learned something new.

It could be the installer gave me a lower grade tint instead of the high end one, but the warranty card state otherwise and i don't think they will risk their reputation by giving me a lower grade tint. Anyway, I am not happy with the way they handle the case and accused me, called me names and trying to shut me up in the forum when i show my displeasure in the brand.

There is no need to report me since I am just one user of Raytech. I'm sure there are millions of Raytech satisfied customer. Usually customer only come online to complain but not to praise. I'm sure there's a lot of happy Raytech users.

Whoever ask you to add tint are probably not professionals or couldn't give a flying fk about your problems and just want quick money.

Additional layers will affect the light spectrum especially at night. If u have already night viewing issues I strongly don't recommend to add additional layers. But if u just want it done cheap and fast, don't care about all these issue, then go ahead.

I did try that before only for the back windscreen, and I can tell u additional layer of tint skewed the light spectrum quite badly. Car headlights become starburst if the tint is different specifications or brand especially.

Then later u complain they will tell u it's the competitors tint, not thiers until u get fedup and remove and redo

Sounds familiar?

What is your main goal? Pure Heat rejection or compliance? If u go black, then go all the way, because if u protect all sides and the back, the front will still bake u due to low heat rejection.

For jpj it depends. They will not summon u on the spot but they will produce u a letter to go and perform inspection. They ask me to go inspection after 6 years of using vlt 30 tint. They issue me a letter in the spot without any vlt test just use naked eye so it's a personal judgement.


I usually just go and come back from work rarely encounter blocks. If u often encounter jpj block, I would suggest go legal to save hassle. Or wait for mr. Loke new regulations on tinting.

Maybe they will have a final proper regulation.

Go ahead if u trust the numbers. A lot of ppl upcar based on the number, another ex raytech posting the experience here. Enjoy the tint

Specifications on paper is not regulated, hence the specification might not accurate and only for marketing purposes.

The tint may advertise 95% IRR, 45% TSER etc but without proper certification and tests nobody knows if that is the advertised specifications and that's what you will be getting.

Tint comes from UK probably they meant Ulu Kelang

No, best is to buy based on friend's proven testimonial or own and sat in the car yourself.

So far my proven experience that confirm last more than 5 years is vkool as it's on metallic film, degradation is lesser than ceramic. My parents altis came with vkool from factory, was using it until the car was sold 10 years later. still blocks heat better than those whatever spec you see on paper. cons is it interfers with smarttag.

Buying based on paper spec is a good way to waste good money.