the way that article is written sounds like the guy is pissed off at the ppl who run trade shows, most probably cos he cant afford his dream guitar at the shows.
afterall, why go to a trade show if you're not gonna trade/buy?
some of the new gibsons are crap tho.
as for vintage fenders, well obviously again cant expect perfect condition.
what draws ppl to vintage are the necks and the pickups.
the feel of a nicely played neck, the pickups that have lost abit of that magnetism making them sound sweeter etc etc.
thats why there are relic series.
also my friend has both a '62 and '64 strats, both are in very playable condition.
as for that 'frets nail filing' thing on the gibson, that i wont believe.
the owner of that shop has a right to return the item back to gibson if they chose to do so, but obviously they did not.
which makes you wonder if they're talking crap or not, cos that guy seems to be a prs lover.
would you keep a expensive instrument if theres a defect in it? or return it right away to the manufacturer?
I see. Just curious though. I found it hard to believe what I was reading, so just wanted to hear the other side of the story. When you're paying that much of dough you would expect a good quality instrument, naturally.