Added on June 9, 2008, 3:32 pmWould just like to correct you slightly here, the study was indeed done on rabbits though they never died becasue of it, they were cut up and looked into though. They were fed amounts of cholesterol that for a human to match them he would have to eat cholestrol by the bucket. Yes the rabbits did get atherosclerosis, but as you mentioned, they are vegetarians. the study has never been matched on carnivours, that is, the same results have NEVER been achieved when carnivores or omnivores have been used.
Just because someone says a study showed something, doesn't mean it did, try reading the study yourself, rather than a summary, you may well be surprised at how often they fudge the info. Lipitor alone has sales in excess of 1billion usd a year, certainly reason to push for lower cholesterol.
Heart disease was not real problem (atherosclerosis) until early last century, and seems to coincide with the rise in sugar consumption and rise in frankenoil oops I mean healthy sunflower oil consumption.
Prior to that time, people ate lots of fat meat and few carbs. Often the carbs that were eaten were fermented, even oats were fermented in milk. Fermantation eats up lots of the sugar.
Preopl with hypercholestreolemia, that is people with cholesterol levels of 600-1000 often live well into their 80's.
[/quote]
Ah my apologogies. I was also one of the cholesterol believers at first, but based on that summary was by far moer than enough for me to think through. But I'm sorry for not truly the reading the whole research paper on its own. And thank you very much for clarifying that matter up a lot.