discredit your competitors to win in business. just like dirty politics
Samsung caught cheating again!, This time is Note 3 benchmark test
Samsung caught cheating again!, This time is Note 3 benchmark test
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 02:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
307 posts Joined: May 2013 |
discredit your competitors to win in business. just like dirty politics
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Oct 2 2013, 02:06 PM) For me as user, I want more Antutu score. This is a feature. Samsung knows what I wanted. So u are one of them who kena con and happily say I love to be conned..😄Rgds SamsungFag When the s800 2.3ghz processor is manipulated means it is running faster than 2.3ghz. The problem is consumer will think this phone is faster than others when it may be not. Essentially you are not comparing the same processor with others anymore. |
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(DannyOP @ Oct 2 2013, 03:04 PM) So u are one of them who kena con and happily say I love to be conned..😄 Haha, I stop reading at the bold statement. Faster than 2.3GHZ When the s800 2.3ghz processor is manipulated means it is running faster than 2.3ghz. The problem is consumer will think this phone is faster than others when it may be not. Essentially you are not comparing the same processor with others anymore. Nope, Samsung does not overclock the processor. It just let S800 processor to always run AT 2.3GHZ. This post has been edited by gogo2: Oct 2 2013, 03:25 PM |
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,196 posts Joined: Nov 2012 |
Haih!
|
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,220 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Oct 2 2013, 03:08 PM) Read the article..It not only increase idle speed but also core speed during benchmark. Meaning it no longer runs at 2.3 but higher. That's why there is a 20% increase compared to similar s800 2.3. This post has been edited by DannyOP: Oct 2 2013, 03:27 PM |
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
352 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
Not surprised.
First directly refer to iPhone as their design reference/guidelines, then evil marketing in TW/HK, then special individual setting for benchmark apps. The same Samsung as always. |
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 03:36 PM
|
|
Staff
7,533 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Lowyat.net Malaysia Sex: Yes please |
Im an android fan and not branded fan. All i can say is how is this cheating. When you benchmark u wanna know whats the best u can do with it vs whats the best u can do with something else. Phones obviously will try to pace themselves to conserve battery and going all out for benchmarks is obviously what should be done. In my opinion thats how it should be done, for all phones. When you race u give your best. Unless theres a separate special benchmark for everyday usage specifically but how do u benchmark that. Its like saying lets see who can jog the fastest. Jog yea. Not run. Not walk. Just jog. Good luck benchmarking that. "U jog harder u were running i said jog!"
Do u buy an expensive graphic card, underclock it and benchmark? Duh u dont you benchmark based on best performance. Closed for misleading and flamebait. Ts while the article is interesting but i question the purpose of this thread other than to flamebait. I will give the benefit of doubt this time. This post has been edited by Baronic: Oct 2 2013, 03:54 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0145sec
0.53
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 08:57 AM |