QUOTE(jchue73 @ Oct 18 2013, 03:16 AM)
Marketing and damage control lor. Your arguments has their points, yet at the end of the day are you happy paying 6K for a D610 body which is just a rebranding of last year's camera while a consumer level body that is released just 1 week after contains more upgrades for 1/3rd of the price?
It's not necessary to defend the brand when they are making obvious mistakes.
For me as a prospective FX upgrader it frustrates me that Nikon is capable of adding so much to the D610, yet chose to reserve upgrades for the D5300 instead.
Regardless of whether the upgrades makes a difference to my photography, I am paying that much more, is it not logical for me to expect more?
Oh, btw the quote I highlighted above is by far the easiest mistake a company can make.
The response to the 6D should have been that they will look foward to implementing it in their future product, not proudly saying that "Our customers do not need WIFI" and also testing the intelligence of their prosumer base by saying that there is actually so much demand for a continuous quiet shutter and 0.5FPS increase in speed to warrant a "new" product.
Damage control? Not so much I think.
This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Oct 18 2013, 04:28 AM