QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Dec 3 2013, 05:01 PM)
Only 50 lots sold down Axreit..small amount only, the seller must have key in wrongly due to bursa buggy hahahahaha. REIT V5, Real Estate Investment Trust
REIT V5, Real Estate Investment Trust
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 05:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 05:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 09:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(CP88 @ Dec 3 2013, 09:05 PM) Sifu gark really gaining a lot of publicity though. I am not sifu ler... Eheh, I thought last u caught lots of directionless bunnies on CMMT I am buying reits to park my trading profits only... so i dont count on it to have capital gain.... This post has been edited by gark: Dec 3 2013, 09:23 PM |
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 09:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2013, 11:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 09:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(felixmask @ Dec 4 2013, 09:18 AM) im not said he bad but a great SIFU of WB Disciple Apa lah.. i am no sifu... leh. but he like everywhere.... Maybe he is SUPERMAN flying around with RED UNDERWEAR. Or Ah PEK Flittering rich....everday read Finanaical Statment on stock only and stay next to plantation. My own portfolio, alos take few day to read complete after everyday work. forgive me I work related to plantation, but not live next to plantation. |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 09:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 09:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(river.sand @ Dec 4 2013, 08:33 AM) Even if STAREIT got dilution, the fund raised from right issue will be used to buy new properties, which in turn will increase income. But we do not know whether the new income will be enough to offset dilution... Rights issue is very very bad for dividend/REIT investor... give you dividend then ask back all the money for rights OR you get diluted. That is why when there is rights issue for REIT, there will be selldown, look at SGX reits who issued rights. That is why MY reits prefer private placement and dividend reinvestment plan i.e. killing you slowly.... That is why i prefer REITs which is not heavily leveraged, one is they can grow with further adding of properties and next they have debt headroom no need to resort to nonsense like rights issue/private placement/etc... This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 09:39 AM |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 11:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
Haha Axreit one of top gainer today... +14 cents..
|
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 11:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 02:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Dec 4 2013, 01:35 PM) could be also.. but if force sell, then should sold at best price right? Why sell something 10-12 cents lower then buy queue...but we will never know... This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 02:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 05:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Dec 4 2013, 05:02 PM) i switched some of my igbreit into axreit today, as they both same yield now, and i expect axreit to have better growth potential as compare to igbreit in the next 3 years. I beg to differ, IGB should have better growth, Axreit is already fully leveraged up to the hit. IGB reit D/A ratio is still very low, can acquire more properties using loan, no need to resort to private placement and rights issue. |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 05:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Dec 4 2013, 05:16 PM) IGBreit management pointed out that they do not intend for any acquisition in the near to mid term, they will just focus on organic growth in Midvalley and Garden. I bet their next acquisition can only be the Johor megamall, which will only happen in 5-8 years time when the earning stabilized after finished building it. Yeah different thought.. i look at the risk factor as well. I tend to avoid highly leveraged REIT as you will not know when the debts comes calling. Axreit has the benefit of highly diversified smaller scale properties, which provide room for selling some of those which yield lower for their like. As property price are higher than before, we can get special dividend for the profit earned. In pass few years, we see this happened at least 2 times if i remember correctly. And if not paying us special dividend, they can use the money received from disposal to acquire new assets with better yield. Flexibility is there, unlike shopping mall reit which need huge money for any acquisition as malls are expensive large size asset. Just some thoughts. High leverage equals to high DPU, but carries more risk as well. Devaluation of property can push D/A ratio over the legal limit hence need to raise capital. So is rising yields, which will impact a highly leveraged reit first. A loower leverage reit will able to weather this problem better. Example of the SGX reits which were highly leveraged, all hit with revolving debt/ debt service problem during 2008, and need to raise capital suddenly, end up selling their reit for cheap? I would not want to be an unit holder position during that time. This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 05:35 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 05:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#96
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Dec 4 2013, 05:39 PM) Thanks for pointing that out, agree with you that high leverage = higher risk, especially many have been talking about interest rate hike non-stop (Cherroy may jump out again and denied interest rate hike in near to mid term No need for BNM interest rate hike. Most REIT use revolving credit, MTN and fixed rate instruments, those are affected by MGS yield. Some even have sukuk or bonds, which is even more affected by MGS yields.Anyway, WB said ‘Stop trying to predict the direction of the stock market, the economy, interest rates, or elections.’ BNM can keep interest rate low, but as yields goes up, REIT's cost of capital will increase as well. This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 05:45 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 07:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#97
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(yok70 @ Dec 4 2013, 07:02 PM) Axis REITTotal Asset : 1,585,420 Total Liability : 572,405 Total Equity : 1,013,015 D/A = 36.1% D/E = 56.5% IGB REIT Total Asset : 4,711,552 Total Liability : 1,323,225 Total Equity : 3,542,799 D/A = 28% D/E = 37.3% Having the SAME yield, i would say IGB REIT is having more margin of safety. And there is a reason Hektar is having much higher yield to compensate for the risk and why PAVreit is only 4.5% yield.. This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 07:19 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 07:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#98
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(lambethwalk @ Dec 4 2013, 07:43 PM) hmmmm stareit is rights meh? i thought PP only? Homework homework! Gotta do your homework yok: yes thats what the board said about no dilution. and they gave some reason for it. being newbie, i didn't quite understand all the jargon here and there maybe coverup, saya pun tak tau.. QUOTE STARHILL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST (“STARHILL REIT” OR “TRUST”) (I) PROPOSED PLACEMENT OF NEW UNITS IN STARHILL REIT (“PLACEMENT UNITS”), AT A PRICE TO BE DETERMINED LATER, TO RAISE GROSS PROCEEDS OF UP TO RM800 MILLION; (II) PROPOSED INCREASE IN THE EXISTING APPROVED FUND SIZE OF STARHILL REIT FROM 1,324,388,889 UNITS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 2,125,000,000 UNITS; AND (III)PROPOSED INCREASE IN BORROWING LIMIT TO 60% OF TOTAL ASSET VALUE Hence, the Proposed Placement will involve the proposed placements to (i) YTL Corp to raise gross proceeds of up to RM310 million (“Proposed Placement to YTL Corp”) and (ii) other placees to be identified at a later stage to raise the remaining gross proceeds (“Proposed Private Placement”) to raise the aggregate gross proceeds of up to RM800 million. The issue price for the Placement Units to be is sued pursuant to the Proposed Placement to YTL Corp will be similar to the issue price for the Placement Units to be issued to other placees pursuant to the Proposed Private Placement. Save for the above, all other terms ofthe Proposed Placement remain unchanged. So they will likely issue additional ~310 mil units under PP to YTL corp and another ~490 mil units to other identified investor. So 800 mil additional new shares to existing 1.34 billion shares.. means after the PP, exisitng shareholder will be diluted to 64% of their holdings. BUT new properties will add more income, depends if the new income is able to cover the dilution is the biggest worry AND the 60% D/A maximum.. This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 08:01 PM |
|
|
Dec 4 2013, 08:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#99
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
QUOTE(lambethwalk @ Dec 4 2013, 08:09 PM) hehehehe... YTL agm very kedekut one... usually no FOC food 1.. thats why no one attends.. my reits portfolio are in cold storage. not even in my watchlist .... guilty as charged, no homework done. only attend agm So starreit agm got free makan or not? This post has been edited by gark: Dec 4 2013, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Dec 5 2013, 10:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#100
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
12,534 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: Penang, KL, China, Indonesia.... |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0574sec
1.69
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 04:22 PM |