I think the first gen of the 64 bit ARM androids will have power consumption issues. And I don't think Intel will allow Atom to migrate to 64 bit due to the way they think.

I don't think it's going to fail, since you are still going to run all your apps on Android.

What will be interesting to see is how Google is going to deal with this, but I suspect it's just going to be like Linux, run anything, 32 or 64 bits.

I foresee Intel going to phone processor at a mass scale soon and that will have a great impact on qualcomm and Samseng . The intel processor in Fonepad is disappointing yet the dual core in K900 is totally different story . For a phone with 2500mah battery and 5.5" FHD screen , it has very good battery life

I foresee Intel going to phone processor at a mass scale soon and that will have a great impact on qualcomm and Samseng . The intel processor in Fonepad is disappointing yet the dual core in K900 is totally different story . For a phone with 2500mah battery and 5.5" FHD screen , it has very good battery life

I have a feeling they won't be good in mobile industry. 

Me also, Intel never really work hard on it, as least not for now.

and I hate any Intel chip start with name "Atom". All Atom is crap to me.

Since we're talking about screens and so forth, I am wondering aloud how many have experienced dead pixels, in whatever brand of handphone?

I think there was 1 case reported in HTC One thread, but apart from that I don't recall anyone else ever reporting dead pixels in threads from the past year.

Me also, Intel never really work hard on it, as least not for now.

and I hate any Intel chip start with name "Atom". All Atom is crap to me.

u like Exynos? 

Atom was purposely made to be crap, but it served its purpose during its time.

Note 2 dead pixel dead center, HTC One 2 dead pixel bottom of screen.
Note 2 DOA, HTC One after 1 week.
Warranty, Samsung nice and simple. HTC One, hell experience.

Both yours? Or you've been keeping track ? 

one mine, one is relative (but i'm the go to IT person so..)

You must be lurking

Getting a Note 3 ?

Me also, Intel never really work hard on it, as least not for now.

and I hate any Intel chip start with name "Atom". All Atom is crap to me.

They do well in x86 but not mobile device 

They do well in x86 but not mobile device 

Yup...

Intel came very late to the mobile party since they were so comfortable with the server, notebook and desktop revenues.

They are also extremely paranoid about revenue cannibalization so they have strict product segmentation and lock down.

They've changed the CEO, so perhaps things could change?

Intel came very late to the mobile party since they were so comfortable with the server, notebook and desktop revenues.

They are also extremely paranoid about revenue cannibalization so they have strict product segmentation and lock down.

They've changed the CEO, so perhaps things could change?

Maybe then...

and they is no longer that huge market in PC/laptop already.

If Intel want earning! Is time Intel invest in Mobile market.