How about siggy's 17-50 ? Any good?

Not good la like that bro
Some mosquitoes carry denggi one ar

It's fairly expensive to be honest at 2K+

But what you get is both sharpness and also image stabilization unlike tamron's models where you either go for max sharpness or sacrifice some for VC.

One common problem with the siggy is the hood though, the locking notch becomes loose very fast so you can't "click" it into place anymore

Ahh well, my housing area here is kinda bad la, good thing is I'm only living here for a few more months before shifting to my new house. Just have to tahan for now loh

dont forget the siggy rubber ring also...easily come loose...

Nevermind~ There's always the 18-35 F/1.8 as a replacement (sort of)

i kinda impressed with nikon lens build quality compare with canon...dont mind paying extra buck...such as nikon 18-200 with canon one..,,

I didnt expect the glow on the face... a bonus i guess


If only can pixel peep in filem actually was shooting into sunset facing door...


dun lazy.. buy and shoot.. fun!


wont la.. not that hard since alraedy training in digital.. lessons less expensive one.

my room also same.. haiz.. mst be blood season!

dno bout it..heard many recommended tammy instead.. bt if it's 2k++ then u better get the 18-35 already..

hey guys I'm back with another big question...will there be big difference in terms of image quality for mirrorless compare to dslr, if they're both in the same price range? Thanks!

no difference..both are good..

anyone can give advise one tone mappping
my image is below
from this


to this


i use this technique here
am i doing it correct?

This post has been edited by alpha001: Aug 17 2013, 09:45 AM

i think...what u will get is depending on how much u willing to pay,,.,

Depends on which mirrorless you're talking about. Many different sensor sizes out there.

Image quality wise they're mostly the same in the lower ISO regions.
You'll start to notice obvious differences in noise performance when you push things to say 3200 and beyond when comparing a smaller sensor to a larger one.

Bigger sensors also allow for lesser DOF which makes it easier for subject separation and bokehlicious shots




This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Aug 17 2013, 09:43 AM

In general you will get slightly slower AF speeds (especially under dim conditions) for mirrorless cameras and of course, poorer ergonomics. IQ should be more or less comparable (unless again its under dim conditions), so no worries there

Mirrorless cameras are still a bit expensive at the moment, but definitely worth considering as a "secondary" camera to bring around, especially for travelling since its so light.
I am also considering to get a cheap one so I won't worry so much about getting rob all the time haha XD
Tried a Sony NEX-3N before (RM1.7k), very very good yo, I'm seriously impressed

This post has been edited by [PF] T.J.: Aug 17 2013, 09:46 AM

Woah, nice perspective haha XD
Never thought of taking a photo like this
At 1st I thought those are straws haha

Yeah, was pretty bored so I started looking around for abstract shot.

One of the instances where the shallow DOF is actually useful in my macro work.

Usually I trying to find the proper angle to maximize DOF

yeah..bt practically if both cameras dslr n mirrorless has same sensor size, u wont need to worry too much about it's Image Quality..
bt ease of use n functionality wise different thing..dslr more buttons more shotcuts..

Another abstract




This post has been edited by gunzerdude: Aug 17 2013, 10:23 AM

now what's that? speaker?

Rise n shine!

Warm Lavender by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr

mybe an air filter...XD