yeah. T3 eng and a few T3 bots. only flaw is that it's got no AA.

not that it matters la. any ground unit also have insufficient AA to take down a T3 gunship / bomber.

---

Added on March 25, 2008, 7:20 pmspam colossus? i rather spam CZAR.

This post has been edited by goldfries: Mar 25 2008, 07:20 PM

i brought a few of my brothers ones down with t3 interceptors haha. i'm kinda a person who finds air units to be more of a supporting role than all out assault cause they dont last as long

aiyah you build T4 ground units, they're so slow they get taken down by air units as well. a bunch of T3 bombers could do huge damage.

the thing about CZAR is that it's capable of faster mass-production.

another nice thing about CZAR is that IF you could reach the base without being harassed by fighters, you could do some serious damage.

ahhhh i never noticed it was capable of mass spam haha

straight up any t4 would lose without support....and we both support em i think? so i figure its the way the unit fits into teh attack plan that matters

yes of course. building a colossus is pointless if you don't have backup units to go together.

fatboys can't get near any base that has a few decent air units.

so far i think the best units to actually REACH anyone's base would be anything that cloaks, if not then faster units like Awasa and Kumbang (yes, that's what i call then cybran experimental gunship......... which i end up forgetting it's actual name)

the scathis is nice (T4 cybran arti) but it's slow and has limited range. still pretty nice if you're against someone who doesn't scout.

i like the idea of using multiple czars to span t3 air units. arguably one might as well build those T3 units right off the T3 factory unless the map is big and it's good to have mobile factory without having to ship eng / support cmdr some where.

I don't like to build a lot of T3 gunships becoz my PC cannot support.. Freaking lag.. LOL

That kumbang is called Soul Reaper if not mistaken cause there's one mission that Fletcher keeps complaining that I didn't provide air support..

i use almost same setup as you. also can build many mah. some more i usually be the host machine.



oh that mission ah. cheh he kena hit also he'll teleport away only.

till now i donno what i am missing if i don't fulfil secondary objective.

remember that one mission where you can't be recalled and dostyha or whatever that girl died and you need to survive the onslaught? the other day i free so i play this mission hardmode using cybran. normally is wait till the time complete la but this time i whack until no enemy left on map. haha. spidermonkey + soulreaper is a nice combo.

Come come when are you guys free lets have a game instead of just discussing the stats and what not play 1st then discuss the game. Do not just play Campaign experience multiplayer 2 v 2?

MY setup can build many but if got 30 +/- T3 gunships.. Then the FSP drop to 10~20.. I use 1280x1024 High setting on Fidelity and Texture with 2xAA and Detail set to Medium..

It's nothing to fail secondary objective .. BUT I don't like to see red coloured FAILED..

I launch 2 nukes on each base and let my 100 of T3 bombers rape all those experimental units ...

This game is so much fun cause there's many way to rape the enemy or get raped in various kinda way..

I think your processor is the bottle neck.

this game really uses proc.

anyway, i find la human vs human can take really long time to kau tim a game.

try vs AIX. the fella build crazy wan la. 3 vs 1 also me and my friends can get hit badly, the other day the computer was using 6 - 8 T3 nuke and 3 T3 artillery. got hit sooooooo bad.

I find in most replays its omly 15 min

even when they go t4 also 45 min max

Hi guys, was wondering what are your system specs and do you play the game in high, med or low?

I am thinking of upgrading. Currently can only play low and it is still damn slow.
Is the 3.0 Ghz processor speed important?

it's not the speed. it's the architecture.

anyway i have friends playing on single and dual-core. i use dual-core overclocked processor.

even with the 3870X2, I don't use AA and some effect as it pretty much lags when there's hundreds of unit on-screen.

Hmm... Would either a ati 3870, ati 3850 or 9600 be enough to play it then?
Can't really afford a 3870x2 currently. I wish I could
Really want to play this game. So frustrating. Bought the game almost a year de. Till now still can't play it comfortably

of course it can! my friends are using not even an 8500GT leh. just play low details la

I've personally used 2600XT / 8600GT and even 8400GS on this game. 9600GT/3870/3850 is more than enough.

The Forged Alliance Localized version selling @ RM 69.90 only, right?
Might wanna get it and play online ...
I have to buy the Original or Expansion to get online?

What about 8800GT?

You do not need the 1st one to play online.

I guess anything above 9600GT can play at high settings already ..
THe lag caused by performance of processor..

But your point is at the graphic card and not processor, I wonder how much of this game is graphical intensive and how much is processor.