i did this before but i cannot remember the details so am doing it again. feel free to disagree.
Lakeville vs Ecosky
Location: LV 35/ Eco 65. better visibility and accessibility.
Land Status: LV 30/ Eco 70. Freehold mah.
Amenities: LV 40/ Eco 60. Not so much on the recreational facilities but the future prospect. 10 shoplot versus 36 units.
Density: LV 40/ Eco 60. 2500units/12acre vs 1800units/10 acre
Proximity to rail network: LV 60/ Eco 40. closer to ktm station. Only if you are taking KTM lah. else negligible.
Furnishing: LV 60/ Eco 40. LV gives more. but need to see final product lor.
Proximity to proposed incinerator: LV 40/ Eco 60. If only it happens.
Surroundings: LV 50/ Eco 50. Eco surrounded by PPR apts but also contra with Tesco. LV got lake but needs a lot of work to make it a feature. worry about execution.
Price: LV 65/ Eco 35
based on the above, it is LV 420 / Eco 430.
of course there's a lot more comparison such as developer's background, timing, etc.
so it's a personal choice.
i guess for those that emphasis on budget, LV is for them, wherelse if budget is not the ultimate concern, other factors comes into play.
congratulations to those who secured their dream house.
Investment LAKEVILLE RESIDENCE @ TAMAN WAHYU, Another lifestyle highrises by Mah Sing
Aug 18 2014, 09:18 AM
Quote
0.0218sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled