Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
119 Pages « < 46 47 48 49 50 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V9, Happy birthday Malaysia & ATM ke 50 & 80

views
     
noavatar
post May 30 2013, 10:50 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


Airbus Military pitches new C295W aircraft with winglets

user posted image

Airbus Military has launched an enhanced version of its multi-role C295W aircraft with winglets and enhanced engine performance.

Revealed during a media briefing in Seville, Spain on 29 May, the aircraft serves to offer improved performance, in particular better fuel consumption.

‘It’s not a completely new aircraft, but different to what we have today,’ Gustavo Garcia Miranda, VP market development, explained. ‘It will be our basic aircraft configuration from the fourth quarter of 2014.’

The configuration will be applicable to all C295 versions and will allow the aircraft to operate in hotter and higher conditions, in alliance with the company’s agenda to focus on regions outside of Europe with funding and demand, namely South America and Asia.

‘The ceiling of the aircraft is much improved; 2,000ft higher,’ Miranda continued. ‘The level of improvement is big.’

The enhanced engine performance of the PW127 allows for a one tonne payload increase, while a 30 minute additional time on station opens the aircraft to more ISR missions.

‘We are starting to promote it to the market,’ Miranda continued. ‘We expect to certify it by the second quarter of 2014.’

The winglets are metallic aerostructures with composite attachments, which form a thicker central wing. Flight trials are expected to take place in January 2014, and then it will be certified by May 2014.

A project for an AEW&C configuration of the aircraft will now resume with the new winglets, while future developments could include the integration of new weapon systems.

Source: Shephard Press



user posted image
First flight of a C-295 model, incorporating winglets for the C-295AEW. It is accompanied by another C-295 as support aircraft and filming.


noavatar
post May 30 2013, 11:20 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


USAF estimates F-35 will cost $32,000 per hour to operate


user posted image


The US Air Force estimates that the Lockheed Martin F-35A Joint Strike Fighter will cost about $32,000 per flying hour to operate, the service's top uniformed official says.

"I think we've normalised to a couple of numbers now, about $25,000 per flying hour for the [Lockheed] F-16 C/D model and about $32,000 roughly for the F-35," says USAF chief of staff Gen Mark Welsh. "That number may continue to adjust itself slightly as we decide what factors are in or not, but that gives us an idea now."

The cost numbers have come down from original estimates, Welsh says, and as the USAF gains more experience in operating the F-35 it will glean a better understanding of the type's long-term operating costs.

Flightglobal



noavatar
post May 30 2013, 11:24 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


U.S. sees lifetime cost of F-35 fighter at $1.45 trillion


(Reuters) - The U.S. government now projects that the total cost to develop, buy and operate the Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will be $1.45 trillion over the next 50-plus years, according to a Pentagon document obtained by Reuters.

The Pentagon's latest, staggering estimate of the lifetime cost of the F-35 -- its most expensive weapons program -- is up from about $1 trillion a year ago, and includes inflation.

While inflation accounts for more than one-third of the projected F-35 operating costs, military officials and industry executives were quick to point out that it is nearly impossible to predict inflation over the next half-century.

They also argue that no other weapons program's costs have been calculated over such a long period, and that even shorter-term cost projections for other aircraft do not include the cost of modernization programs and upgrades.

The new cost estimate reflects the Pentagon's proposal to postpone orders for 179 planes for five years, a move that U.S. official say will save $15.1 billion through 2017, and should avert costly retrofits if further problems arise during testing of the new fighter, which is only about 20 percent complete.

The Pentagon still plans to buy 2,443 of the new radar-evading, supersonic warplanes, plus 14 development aircraft, in the coming decades, although Air Force Secretary Michael Donley last week warned that further technical problems or cost increases could eat away at those numbers.

The new estimate, based on calculations made by the Cost Assessment Program Evaluation (CAPE) office, includes operating and maintenance costs of $1.11 trillion, including inflation, and development and procurement costs of $332 billion.

The Government Accountability Office last week projected it would cost $397 billion to develop and buy the planes, up from its earlier forecast of $382 billion.

The Pentagon office that runs the F-35 program office has a lower estimate for lifetime costs, although it is still around $1 trillion, according to two sources familiar with the estimates. Both industry and government have put a huge emphasis on reducing operating costs and keeping the plane affordable.

The new estimates are part of a revised F-35 baseline dated March 26 that will be sent to Congress on Thursday.

AVERAGE COST $135 MLN PER F-35

The new baseline forecasts the average cost of the F-35 fighter, including research and development (R&D) and inflation, at $135 million per plane, plus an additional $26 million for the F135 engine built by Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies Corp.

In 2012 dollars, the average cost of each single-seat, single-engine plane, including R&D, would be $112.5 million, plus $22 million for the engine.

This is the first year that the government has separated out the cost of the plane and the engine, and comparison figures were not immediately available. Lockheed Martin has said the average cost of the plane will be around $65 million to $70 million, based on 2010 dollars.

Lockheed Martin declined comment on the new estimate, saying it had not yet received the Pentagon's latest report.

Lockheed spokesman Joe LaMarca said the company still believed the new fighter jet would cost the same or less to operate and maintain than the seven legacy warplanes it will replace, while offering far greater capabilities.

INCREASES DUE TO GOVERNMENT CHANGES

Defense analyst Loren Thompson said three quarters of the cost increases on the F-35 program were linked to government changes in the scope of the program, and the way it was estimating costs.

For instance, he said, the Pentagon initially planned to station the plane at 33 bases, but later changed the number to 49. It initially calculated operating costs over 30 years, but then chose a longer timeframe of 50 years, he said.

"The program costs appear to be rising much faster than they actually are because the government keeps changing how it calculates things," Thompson said.

The Pentagon's proposal to postpone buying 179 planes for five years added $60 billion to the operations and support cost of the program, since those planes will now be delivered in later years when inflation is higher. The push also added two years to the duration of the program, according to an internal Lockheed calculation obtained by Reuters.

But Winslow Wheeler, a critic of the program, predicts cost growth on the program will be even greater than estimated by the Pentagon, given the complexity of the F-35 fighter.

Lockheed is developing three variants of the new plane for the U.S. military and eight partner countries: Britain, Australia, Canada, Italy, Turkey, Denmark, Norway, Australia and the Netherlands. They now plan to buy a combined total of 697 planes, down from 730 in the previous Pentagon estimate.


Source: Reuters



azriel
post May 30 2013, 11:33 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 30 2013, 10:50 AM)
Airbus Military pitches new C295W aircraft with winglets

user posted image

It seem that the winglet will be standard in the CN-235 MPA & C295W version.

PT.DI's newest CN-235 MPA with winglet for the Indonesian Navy during test flight:

user posted image

This post has been edited by azriel: May 30 2013, 11:35 AM
noavatar
post May 30 2013, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(azriel @ May 30 2013, 11:33 AM)
It seem that the winglet will be standard in the CN-235 MPA & C295W version.

PT.DI's newest CN-235 MPA with winglet for the Indonesian Navy during test flight:

user posted image
*
It is not as simple as just adding the winglet. For the C295W they have to strengthened wing to allow the installation of the metallic winglets adding 90kg to the planes's weight so they also have enhanced the engine (Pratt & Whitney Canada PW127 engines). The winglets will boost payload, climb, altitude and cruise performance.

I don't know whether the Indon variant have undergone similar enhancement.






noavatar
post May 30 2013, 12:05 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


Construction begins on US Navy’s second Zumwalt-class ship


user posted image


Construction work on the US Navy's second DDG 1000 Zumwalt-class multimission ship, USS Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001), has started at General Dynamics' Bath Iron Works with the official keel laying and authentication ceremony.

The ship will be named to honour master-at-arms 2nd class Michael Monsoor (SEAL), who received the Medal of Honor for his actions during combat on 29 September 2006 in Ar Ramadi, Iraq.

Program Executive Office, Ships DDG 1000 programme manager captain Jim Downey said: "This extremely capable warship is a lasting tribute to petty officer Monsoor's bravery and sacrifice and will symbolise his strength and dedication for generations to come."


user posted image


The Zumwalt-class guided-missile naval vessels will be armed with tactical tomahawk, standard missile SM-3 and the evolved Sea Sparrow missile (ESSM) to provide offensive, distributed and precision fires in support of forces onshore.

Featuring a low radar profile, an integrated power system and total ship computing environment infrastructure, the 15,000t ships will operate as part of naval, joint or combined maritime forces and provide credible, independent forward presence and deterrence.

Construction on the 610ft-long USS Michael Monsoor began in March 2010 and is currently more than 60% complete.

Scheduled to be launched and christened in 2013, the first DDG 1000 vessel is due for delivery to the US Navy in 2014, with initial operations scheduled for 2016.

The second and third ships of the class, the future USS Michael Monsoor and the future USS Lyndon B Johnson are scheduled to be delivered to the navy in 2016 and 2018 respectively.


Source: naval-technology


user posted image



noavatar
post May 30 2013, 12:24 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


Turkey: Anadolu Shipyard Signs Supply Contracts for LST Project


user posted image


Anadolu Shipyard has organized a ceremony to sign three contracts with the most important suppliers of its Landing Ship Tank (LST) project.

The signatories of the supply contracts with the shipyard are ASELSAN, HAVELSAN and İŞBİR Elektrik, all of them companies of Turkish Armed Forces Foundation.

Based on the contract, previously signed with Turkish SSM (Undersecretariat of Defense Industries), the shipyard has been entrusted with building of two LSTs.

The new generation Landing Ship Tanks are fast amphibious vessels of upper-intermediate size with significant armament power. LSTs will play a major role of power projection with transporting huge quantities of fire support elements and marines in order to conduct amphibious operations.

The responsibility of the project’s design, construction, system integration, performance and timely delivery is shouldered by Anadolu Deniz İnşaat Kızakları Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.


Source: Navaltoday


TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SHIP

Function:
Primary:
Amphibious operations and troop transfer.

Secondary:
Fast humanitarian and rescue aid to disaster areas.Medical Aid and Transportation

Description:
Ship is a mono-hull type vessel, all steel construction, designed to meet the speed, sea keeping maneuverability and stability requirements of Turkish Naval Forces Command. Expected service life will be 40 years.

Displacement : 7125 Tons
Length (LOA) : 138.75 m
Length (LWL) : 130.80 m
Beam : 19,60 m
Draught : Less than 2.0 m forward, less than 5.0 m aft at full load
Propulsion : 4 x main diesel engines 2880 kW each,
2x shafts, 2x controllable pitch propellers
1x 500 kW bow thruster
Speed (max continuous) : 18 + knots at full load displacement.

Sea worthiness :
Ship will have an unlimited operation capability at Sea State-5 and will be operable with some limitations at Sea State-6 or higher. Unlimited helicopter operations at Sea State-4.

Complement:
Ship : 12 officers, 51 petty officers, 66 ratings
Joint Group Headquarters : 17 officers
Marines : 350

Ship is capable of carrying 1180 tons of mixed vehicles or cargo on vehicle and open decks at full performance.

Electric :
4x785 kW Diesel Generators with Power Management System 380 V, 3 Phase, 50 Hz.

Rules and Regulations :
IMO/MARPOL 73/78
IMO/SOLAS
COLREG
Stability as per BV – 1033
NATO STANDARDS (STANAG, ANEP etc.)
ISO
TSE
TURKISH NAVY STANDARDS



KYPMbangi
post May 30 2013, 12:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(noavatar @ May 30 2013, 12:05 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

user posted image
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
The future is really here

Masa kecik dulu, bapak aku dlm navy kekadang ada bawak balik those foreign military magazine.
And dalam tu ada satu dua artikel pasal satu future navy ships, besar macam oil tanker tapi cuma ada missile vls aje,
search balik skarang rupanye "arsenal ship".

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

A massive missile cruiser, with nothing but lots of missiles
Too bad no funding..

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: May 30 2013, 12:30 PM
noavatar
post May 30 2013, 12:33 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 30 2013, 12:26 PM)
The future is really here

Masa kecik dulu, bapak aku dlm navy kekadang ada bawak balik those foreign military magazine.
And dalam tu ada satu dua artikel pasal satu future navy ships, besar macam oil tanker tapi cuma ada  missile vls aje,
search balik skarang rupanye "arsenal ship".

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


A massive missile cruiser, with nothing but lots of missiles
Too bad no funding..
*
Wiki says:

QUOTE
An arsenal ship is a concept for a floating missile platform intended to have as many as five hundred vertical launch bays for mid-sized missiles, most likely cruise missiles. In current US naval thinking, such a ship would initially be controlled remotely by an Aegis Cruiser, although plans include control by AWACS aircraft such as the E-2 Hawkeye and E-3 Sentry.




atreyuangel
post May 30 2013, 06:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



the rumours of tiger is strong now!

I wan viper! cry.gif


ekceli Tiger pun bullehhh~
kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 30 2013, 07:08 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ May 30 2013, 06:50 PM)
the rumours of tiger is strong now!

I wan viper! cry.gif
ekceli Tiger pun bullehhh~
*
i prefer if they use the money procure MPSS, MPA and some more transport helicopters first..and why nobody want the turk's Mangusta?? sad.gif
ezatamrol
post May 30 2013, 07:21 PM

New Member
*
Validating
15 posts

Joined: Jun 2012


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ May 30 2013, 06:50 PM)
the rumours of tiger is strong now!

I wan viper! cry.gif
ekceli Tiger pun bullehhh~
*
brp bijik agak2?
azriel
post May 30 2013, 07:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
user posted image

QUOTE
Thursday, 30 May, 2013 | 10:21 WIB

Indonesia Bolsters Defense with Swiss Skyshield

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta- To strengthen Indonesia’s aerospace defense, the Defense Ministry has not only purchased fighter aircrafts, but also skyshields from the Rheinmetall Air Defence factory in Switzerland. The main weaponry system in the Oerlikon Skyshield is a cannon that is integrated with an airbase radar.

"We ordered six units of the Oerlikon Skyshield, it is currently being produced," said head of Defense Facilities at the Defense Ministry, Jr. Adm. Rachmad Lubis yesterday.

These six cannon skysheilds cost a total of US$202 million. However, the nation’s air force must wait quite a while for the Oerlikon Skyshield because it can only be delivered in 2015.


source
atreyuangel
post May 30 2013, 07:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ May 30 2013, 07:08 PM)
i prefer if they use the money procure MPSS, MPA and some more transport helicopters first..and why nobody want the turk's Mangusta??  sad.gif
*
first you have to know about how military budget is sort out
PUTD have been gunning for this since early 90s, if they do not spend soon the allocated budget will be taken to other places

brapa bijik tak tau lagi

KYPMbangi
post May 30 2013, 08:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ May 30 2013, 07:55 PM)
first you have to know about how military budget is sort out
PUTD have been gunning for this since early 90s, if they do not spend soon the allocated budget will be taken to other places
brapa bijik tak tau lagi
*
Which version u think hmm.gif
atreyuangel
post May 30 2013, 10:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 30 2013, 08:35 PM)
Which version u think  hmm.gif
*
Since aku rasa PUTD dah lama nak COIN copter jadi aku rasa HAD kot!
ayanami_tard
post May 30 2013, 11:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
if want COIN then Mi-35 gotta be the best solution.


kerolzarmyfanboy
post May 31 2013, 12:47 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ May 30 2013, 11:34 PM)
if want COIN then Mi-35 gotta be the best solution.
*
they won't pick russian helos..haha and ayanami, u punya profile pic seems familiar..your previous profile pic too.. brows.gif brows.gif
noavatar
post May 31 2013, 01:26 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013




user posted image




atreyuangel
post May 31 2013, 02:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ May 30 2013, 11:34 PM)
if want COIN then Mi-35 gotta be the best solution.
*
to bad you and me are not the ones preparing the contract!
if not Viper for me!

119 Pages « < 46 47 48 49 50 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0344sec    0.56    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 06:53 PM