Sup Com's Coloso copy cat Sup Com had the Idea of a laser Robot for a long long time b4 EA came up with the juggernaut Idea and C&C3 nuke sux. Damn I feel this game is just like Act of War there isnt much difference in graphics also.

erm fujkenasai no offence i know u like sup com but there is no need to repeat and let ppl know that u are sup com number 1 fan everytime we posted something regrading the demo. =)

Btw i'm pretty suprised that my laptop were able to support the game using only 512 ram and 128 X300 card. But the loading time were much slower compared to my desktop

This post has been edited by westthen: Feb 28 2007, 10:56 AM

hmmm... seriously... there's nothing groundbreaking with supcom... i reinstalled TA and played it. has the same feel. only thing is they bumped up the graphics n the size of the play area...

same thing with CnC3... old stuff, new graphics... meh...

Give me Red Alert 3! Heh, I love the units in red alert. So much character.

I don't trust EA now........I'll wait a few month before buying to see EA's support for this game.

Heh same feeling here.

lol... hardcore supcom fan detected....

but seriously, if you are OLD enough to have played TA like me, you wouldn't be raving wonders abt supcom. i can seriously tell you NOTHING has changed, except for the graphics, the introduction of experimental units/buildings and the map size... so in my books, that's a tweak-con job

personally, i would rather replay TA... there's quite a few mods out and also new units to play around with. google and you shall be enlightened and play CnC3 because of the Scrins. hey it's a new alien race/faction with lasers and giant bugs. how is that not cool, lol...

i'm quite impressed with the demo

Best thing of all is this game doesnt eat up a lot of computer resource.
The game ran smoothly in near Max settings. The visuals effect are breathtaking.

and EA did a great job by hiring some familiar actors for the FMVs.

Some of stuff that i dont like is the sound effects and some of the unit's design.
The sound of the machine gun used by the infantry sounds weak.

computer spec plz ><

ya not as lag as i thought my pc will go..

hmm...played the demo with all settings to max. not laggy. and it shouldn't since it is using an old engine. graphics look dated as stated in some demo hands on from gaming sites. and the terrain was not destructible as in the old tiberium sun.

playing this game has no feel at all, it is like playing an old game...maybe it is a good thing to some; maybe i've been spoilt by recent RTS like CoH and supcom. anything C&C3 can do, every other games do it better. the only difference would be cinematics for single player missions. but that doesnt change much to the gameplay.

maybe i'll skip this game. or i will try the demo once more to give it another chance.


well, supcom also has a new race too, while TA only has 2. so there's nothing special. and from some previews, the alien race in C&C3 plays almost the same as the GDI and NOD. i would not say much as i havent try the new race. nothing has changed too for C&C3 for what i've seen in the demo. i feel a lil bit boring playing it. hmm.

This post has been edited by SpikeTwo: Feb 28 2007, 02:58 PM

I don't why ppl bash this game
I like this game so much.

They hate EA for what they did to the C&C franchise(& other franshises) all these years, basically they never gave it the respect it deserved. That and the lackluster support for their games.

Somehow I feel C&C 3 should be able to restore some confidence back in EA's favor. It could have been alot worse & that would've been a sad end to one of the biggest RTS franchises.

This post has been edited by Araes: Feb 28 2007, 03:21 PM

hmm good point but the three sides on supcom is basically the same type of sci fi future mecha techno thingamajigs... they should've diversified at least one side.. maybe the Aeons should be a more organo-tech based IMHO...

about the Scrins playing almost the same as GDI and NOD, i can't say yet because my demo is still downloading, hur hur hur... but hey at least the Scrins is supposed to be alien and is technologically more advance than GDI n NOD... well, that's as good as a new side to me

What is wrong with EA and games support and staying loyal to the series?

from what i found from a forum..

http://www.cnc3forums.com/

This post has been edited by akiraceo: Feb 28 2007, 04:03 PM

I guess the diff btw SC and TA is that the screen and maps are much more larger than before, you can launch like 30 nukes and there has not been an RTS with Naval in it for a long long time. Thats why its more intresting.

But seriously I had much more excitement in SC's demo than C&C3 demo prolly Im bias but out of the 2 demos Id rather play SC and EA is so stingy in C&C3 demo they do not even enable people to save games.

Cos EA is a $$ hungry company that install spyware on people's computer and only lets you know after you buy the damn F***kin game. DAMN you EA and the spoil C&C2 DAMN you again EA.

OOT in reply to fujkenasai... nukes are such a common end game superweapon, lol... personally, i like that experimental artillery building in SC... it EATS and DRINKS power but the rate of fire, range and cover area is freakin amazing...

neways, with all said... i'm a pro CnC fella, lol... regardless of spywares or the lack of option to save in a demo... i'll play it first, before dishing out the winning point...

Viva Westwood for making such a long impression on RTS gamers boo EA for making it suck.

Stop bashing game in here dude.
I hate basher dude.