please put ur private fights in PMs.
do not ask for system requirements if the official sites do not have them.

lol...i doubt the recommended game req. since this is an RTS which doesn't need high FPS, and using an old generals engine (dunno wat was it called). anyways, things might be possible tho. EA is famous for crappin out games (better than UBI) with resource hungry modified old engines. or wait till they at last optimized the final game. (with patches...hahahahaha)...

hmm...i really wish to play some sort of demo first before buying this. u know, EA...i'm paranoid. yeah.

welp, i dont think u can play most games nowadays with anything lower than those specified in the min req. especially those games that come out Q2 2007 onwards.

lol...alienware gonna cost u a bomb here man.
if u wana play games, better go for desktops la. cheaper.
btw, is there any news that C&C will have a demo like supcom?

are u sure all those at least Rm1k only? hahaha...need at least RM2.5k to 3k man. it is like buying a whole new rig for this game.

how's the game performed? any lag issues? wat's ur pc spec?

hmm...played the demo with all settings to max. not laggy. and it shouldn't since it is using an old engine. graphics look dated as stated in some demo hands on from gaming sites. and the terrain was not destructible as in the old tiberium sun.

playing this game has no feel at all, it is like playing an old game...maybe it is a good thing to some; maybe i've been spoilt by recent RTS like CoH and supcom. anything C&C3 can do, every other games do it better. the only difference would be cinematics for single player missions. but that doesnt change much to the gameplay.

maybe i'll skip this game. or i will try the demo once more to give it another chance.


well, supcom also has a new race too, while TA only has 2. so there's nothing special. and from some previews, the alien race in C&C3 plays almost the same as the GDI and NOD. i would not say much as i havent try the new race. nothing has changed too for C&C3 for what i've seen in the demo. i feel a lil bit boring playing it. hmm.

This post has been edited by SpikeTwo: Feb 28 2007, 02:58 PM

i dunno why there's no damage to the floor/ground once i shoot it with rockets, lasers...unlike previous titles. and trees wont burn even if i burn them. hmmm...is this in the demo only? hope the full version will have better visuals. cos the weapons look weak in this game. the only effect that i liked is the flame...the flame thrower. which looks 100x better than CoH croc tank's flame. that's the only bonus for c&c3 tho.

edit: cib** streamyx... thanks.

This post has been edited by SpikeTwo: Mar 5 2007, 05:11 PM

common. don't argue in a fanboy style (not only u). CoH has new and better game engine than c&c3. so there's no way c&c dated engine could do better. but i don't know why CoH flames are so lame. hahaha...cos the CoH engine could pwn c&c engine anytime, say graphics, physics, shadows, animations, lots of particles/dust, blood...you name it. those things, you dont see in C&C3, not the details, no. nay.

it is OK to be with dated engine, but it seems something is lacking compared to previous C&C titles. lack of details. buildings wont burn even if damaged. they just collapse. i cant shoot and destroy those abandoned vehicles like i could in old c&c. those lil details...

This post has been edited by SpikeTwo: Mar 5 2007, 08:32 PM