come la boon gor... 

The implication of that question is rather 'strange'.
Do consider the following.
The question suggests that one needs to be 'qualified' to talk about stocks.
When that happens, the suggestion is that one needs to be making money to talk stocks, which would mean that one needs to show proof before talking.
Wouldn't it be strange when this happens?
Is like saying 'Show us your portfolio before you talk'.

I believe many here are making money.

And in regards to Unit Trust investing.
Well I think very lowly of Unit Trust managers and I would rather have my money rot in my biscuit tins (under my bed ) than put money into it.

Bloody crocodile tears!

I don't know how to buy at current price now. 

Talk is free and talk is also cheap!   

I actually don't believe in talking about our portfolio profit or losses because it's the internet. 

Most important is the discussion itself.
A good discussion is worth all the gold. 

Mmm Tak.

I see the stock developing nicely.
And it's in my opinion that I think the stock should pull back first before testing 40 sen. 

I have put it in my watch list for now. 

Did I say that one must make money in order to be 'qualified' to talk about stocks? I am not making money but I am here in this thread. But if you think that you can make money, then you should at least tell us you have been making money.

You said, "I believe many here are making money." Based on what? They told you or you just believe, based on what you want to believe?

Just make sure you sell before voting day. For all you know, there's  big market manipulation going on by the caretaker government to "prove" that they are doing a good job at governing this country!

u sapu 20k lots.. then u wait break 40cents throw la... so easy.... 

u can hold a stock for few years man !   

gpacket please wait for me

 

Since when I play stocks like this?

Peace la. 

One last time.
I said that is the implication when you ask Gark how much money he has made.
My opinion and viewpoint and it is for you to disagree, 

It's like why is it so important to know if one is making or losing money?
Isn't it more important the discussion itself?

My statement "I believe many here are making money."?
That's my belief la.
My belief, my opinion. 
I judge from what's being said and not said in the forum.
There's no need for me to ask for proof.
If I am wrong about the judgement of whether one is making money or not, so be it.
I would not lose sleep over it.

fuyohhh.. u rich ppl.... 

Did I ask Gark EXACTLY how much he has made? I only asked for an idea of how much he is making. You said, "My opinion and viewpoint and it is for you to disagree". So I disagree. So what are you objecting to now? The way you are talking is like a school boy. Even fools have opinions, but there's a big difference between an informed opinion and an opinion based on what you FEEL.

Eat your tipsi now kena hold.

1 lot also didnt eat... hold apa? 

Forum war zone kah ?

Well I have not lost money in my overall holdings, since i started investing if that is what you are asking... investing is a long term process, if you treat it like gambling, you will lose your pants. 

Did I say that one must make money in order to be 'qualified' to talk about stocks? I am not making money but I am here in this thread. But if you think that you can make money, then you should at least tell us you have been making money.

You said, "I believe many here are making money." Based on what? They told you or you just believe, based on what you want to believe?