The implication of that question is rather 'strange'.
Do consider the following.
The question suggests that one needs to be 'qualified' to talk about stocks.
When that happens, the suggestion is that one needs to be making money to talk stocks, which would mean that one needs to show proof before talking.
Wouldn't it be strange when this happens?
Is like saying 'Show us your portfolio before you talk'.
I believe many here are making money.

And in regards to Unit Trust investing.
Well I think very lowly of Unit Trust managers and I would rather have my money rot in my biscuit tins (under my bed

) than put money into it.

Did I say that one must make money in order to be 'qualified' to talk about stocks? I am not making money but I am here in this thread. But if you think that you can make money, then you should at least tell us you have been making money.
You said, "I believe many here are making money." Based on what? They told you or you just believe, based on what you want to believe?