QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Jun 5 2013, 10:02 AM)
IntelAtomSoCAndroid-IA(X86)phone/tab,INTEL inside, SamsungGTab3/FHD-AsusFonepadNote6,MeMO10
IntelAtomSoCAndroid-IA(X86)phone/tab,INTEL inside, SamsungGTab3/FHD-AsusFonepadNote6,MeMO10
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,000 posts Joined: Feb 2010 From: Banting, Puchong, KL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 03:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6
![]() Inb4 I read fake note thread http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=4610...epad_note_fhd_6 Datasheet+Views: 483 views since addition of datasheet (June 03, 2013) Datasheet_State: Incomplete specifications Expected:Release:Date: July, 2013 Software_Environment Embedded+Operating:System: Google Android 4.2.2 Browse devices running this OS Microprocessor,_Chipset CPU_Clock: 1600 MHz CPU: Intel Atom Z2560 Browse devices based on this microprocessor Memory,;Storage_capacity RAM:capacity: 2 GiB Display Display-Type: color Super IPS+ TFT , 16777216 scales Display+Diagonal: 6 " Display;Resolution: 1080 x 1920 Sound Microphone(s): stereo Microphone-Input: 3.5mm Loudspeaker(s): stereo Audio:Output: 3.5mm Cellular:Phone Cellular;Networks: GSM850, GSM900, GSM1800, GSM1900, UMTS850 (B5), UMTS900 (B8), UMTS1900 (B2), UMTS2100 (B1) Cellular:Data-Links: GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+ Call+Alert: 128 -chord melody Vibrating:Alert: Supported Speakerphone_: Supported Control-Peripherals Positioning;Device: Multi-touch screen Primary;Keyboard: Not supported Directional-Pad: Not supported Scroll:Wheel: Not supported Interfaces Expansion-Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash USB: USB 2.0 client, 480Mbit/s micro-USB Bluetooth: No information Wireless+LAN: 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n Infrared:Gate: Not supported Multimedia:Telecommunication Analog+Radio;Receiver: No information Digital+Media+Broadcast;Tuner: Not supported Satellite-Navigation Built-in-GPS_module: Supported Complementary;GPS_Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging Built-in:Digital:Camera Main+Camera: 8 MP Autofocus-(AF): Supported Optical:Zoom: 1 x Secondary:Camera: 1.2 MP Additional_Details Built-in;accelerometer: Supported Battery: built-in This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jun 5 2013, 03:43 PM |
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 03:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
Asus MeMO Pad FHD 10 32GB Specs
& Samsung GT-P5200 Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 3G 16GB Specs oh wai got TF300 edi http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=4608...pad_fhd_10_32gb Datasheet_Views: 344 views since addition of datasheet (June 03, 2013) Datasheet;State: Preliminary specifications Expected_Release_Date: July, 2013 Dimensions: 264.6 x 182.4 x 9.5 millimetres Mass: 580 grams (battery included) Software+Environment Embedded_Operating+System: Google Android 4.2.2 Browse devices running this OS Microprocessor,-Chipset CPU:Clock: 1600 MHz CPU: Intel Atom Z2560 Browse devices based on this microprocessor Memory,_Storage;capacity RAM:capacity: 2 GiB ROM+capacity: 29.8 GiB Display Display_Type: color IPS TFT , 16777216 scales Display+Diagonal: 10.1 " Display-Resolution: 1920 x 1200 Sound Microphone(s): stereo Microphone:Input: 3.5mm Loudspeaker(s): stereo Audio_Output: 3.5mm Control;Peripherals Positioning;Device: Multi-touch screen Primary+Keyboard: Not supported Directional-Pad: Not supported Scroll+Wheel: Not supported Interfaces Expansion+Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash USB: USB 2.0 client, 480Mbit/s micro-USB Bluetooth: Bluetooth 3.0 Wireless+LAN: 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n Infrared-Gate: Not supported Multimedia;Telecommunication Analog-Radio+Receiver: Not supported Digital:Media_Broadcast_Tuner: Not supported Satellite-Navigation Built-in-GPS;module: Supported Complementary;GPS:Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging Built-in;Digital_Camera Main;Camera: 5 MP Autofocus+(AF): Supported Optical:Zoom: 1 x Secondary;Camera: 1.2 MP Additional_Details Built-in_accelerometer: Supported Battery: built-in http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=4613..._3_10.1_3g_16gb Datasheet_Views: 242 views since addition of datasheet (June 04, 2013) Datasheet+State: Preliminary specifications Expected+Release;Date: July, 2013 Dimensions: 243.1 x 176.1 x 7.95 millimetres Mass: 510 grams (battery included) Software+Environment Embedded_Operating;System: Google Android 4.2.2 Browse devices running this OS Microprocessor,:Chipset CPU;Clock: 1600 MHz CPU: Intel Atom Z2560 Browse devices based on this microprocessor Memory,-Storage+capacity RAM:capacity: 1 GiB ROM_capacity: 14.9 GiB (accessible: 11 GiB) Display Display+Type: Supported Display-Diagonal: 10.1 " Display-Resolution: 1280 x 800 Video:out: 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution Sound Microphone(s): mono Loudspeaker(s): stereo Audio-Output: 3.5mm Cellular_Phone Cellular_Networks: GSM850, GSM900, GSM1800, GSM1900, UMTS850 (B5), UMTS900 (B8), UMTS1900 (B2), UMTS2100 (B1) Cellular:Data:Links: GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+ Control_Peripherals Positioning_Device: Multi-touch screen Primary:Keyboard: Not supported Directional+Pad: Not supported Scroll:Wheel: Not supported Interfaces Expansion+Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash, microSDXC USB: USB 2.0 host/client, 480Mbit/s micro-USB Bluetooth: Bluetooth 4.0 Wireless_LAN: 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n Infrared;Gate: Not supported Multimedia:Telecommunication Analog-Radio:Receiver: Not supported Digital+Media_Broadcast:Tuner: Not supported Satellite_Navigation Built-in:GPS:module: Supported Complementary+GPS-Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging Built-in+Digital+Camera Main;Camera: 3.1 MP Optical+Zoom: 1 x Secondary-Camera: 1.2 MP Additional_Details Built-in:accelerometer: Supported Battery: built-in Battery+Capacity: 6800 mAh This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jun 5 2013, 03:46 PM |
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 05:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
|
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 06:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Jun 5 2013, 03:52 PM) That was claimed by Reuters, nothing official. On Samsung's page, it only stated dual-core. I'm assuming it's actly Snapdragon 400 http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/03/samsung-galaxy-tab-3/Samsung don't use their own Exynos5 cause can't support LTE 4G Samsung like to use processor from different company |
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 06:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Jun 5 2013, 06:18 PM) http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/03/samsung-galaxy-tab-3/ That's why I said. Most probably it'll use Qualcomm's. Intel's also hasn't developed LTE yetSamsung don't use their own Exynos5 cause can't support LTE 4G Samsung like to use processor from different company |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 06:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Jun 5 2013, 04:25 PM) For the first time, Kilroy demonstrated Intel's 4G LTE multimode solution in conjunction with the next-generation 22nm quad-core Atom SoC for tablets. The Intel® XMM 7160 is one of the world's smallest4and lowest-power multimode-multiband LTE solutions and will support global LTE roaming in a single SKU.http://www.anandtech.com/show/7009/arm-cor...ng-in-late-2014 |
|
|
Jun 5 2013, 07:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Jun 5 2013, 06:54 PM) For the first time, Kilroy demonstrated Intel's 4G LTE multimode solution in conjunction with the next-generation 22nm quad-core Atom SoC for tablets. The Intel® XMM 7160 is one of the world's smallest4and lowest-power multimode-multiband LTE solutions and will support global LTE roaming in a single SKU. It'll not be available anytime soon. Next year, perhapshttp://www.anandtech.com/show/7009/arm-cor...ng-in-late-2014 |
|
|
Jun 11 2013, 01:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
![]() Is the Samsung Galaxy S 4 coming with an Intel mobile chip? (updated) http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/05/intel-samsung-galaxy-s-4/ This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jun 11 2013, 01:16 AM |
|
|
Jul 4 2013, 11:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
First Intel Bay Trail Benchmark Emerges Online, Crushes All of ARM’s Records
So you didn’t buy Intel’s promises of challenging ARM-based mobile processors in terms of raw speed, did you? Well, it’s true, Intel started off rather timidly in the mobile décor, with the low-end Medfield platform, but the Clover Trail+ chip found inside Lenovo’s K900 should have raised a flag or two in the ARM camp. ![]() And if we are to trust a newly spotted benchmark, the next generation of processors, codenamed Bay Trail, will step things up quite a lot. What’s “a lot”? Well, I’m going to throw a number at you – 43,416 points. That’s how much a mystery Android-based gadget running Intel Bay Trail scored in the popular benchmark test called AnTuTu. For comparison, the zippiest ARM-powered CPU around, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800, was seen choking just before reaching 30,000 points inside the newly unveiled Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A and barely hitting the 32,000 mark inside a mysterious LG F320 device that we think is the G2. Now, exactly how big is this 11,000 – 13,000 gap between Bay Trail and Snapdragon 800? Massive. Just think of how much zippier the S4 is in real-life use compared with, say, the GS3. Well, that’s how much faster we expect Bay Trail-powered gadgets to be versus the S4 and other current Android giants. And that’s not all. If this new AnTuTu benchmark is legit (that’s a big “if”, remember), the enigmatic Bay Trail-based machine tested had a CPU clocked at just 1.1 GHz at its core. And since Silvermont (that’s another name for Bay Trail, by the way) will have a maximum clock speed of 2.1 GHz, the sky is the limit for the potential performance of a higher clocked SoC. Dayum! The bad news in this entire equation is we have no idea what kind of gadget is this “byt_t_ffrd10” and what company will manufacture it. It does apparently run Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean, which narrows it down a little (Bay Trail will support both Android and Windows 8), but I wouldn’t want to speculate as to the OEM’s name. It could be someone like Samsung, HTC, LG or Sony or it could well be ZTE, Lenovo, Acer or Huawei. Only time will tell. For now, let us look in awe again at that incredible benchmark score and expect the unexpected. ![]() |
|
|
Jul 5 2013, 12:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Jul 4 2013, 09:34 PM) First Intel Bay Trail Benchmark Emerges Online, Crushes All of ARM’s Records *I had repost this in my Smartphone/Tablet processor TereadSo you didn’t buy Intel’s promises of challenging ARM-based mobile processors in terms of raw speed, did you? Well, it’s true, Intel started off rather timidly in the mobile décor, with the low-end Medfield platform, but the Clover Trail+ chip found inside Lenovo’s K900 should have raised a flag or two in the ARM camp. ![]() And if we are to trust a newly spotted benchmark, the next generation of processors, codenamed Bay Trail, will step things up quite a lot. What’s “a lot”? Well, I’m going to throw a number at you – 43,416 points. That’s how much a mystery Android-based gadget running Intel Bay Trail scored in the popular benchmark test called AnTuTu. For comparison, the zippiest ARM-powered CPU around, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800, was seen choking just before reaching 30,000 points inside the newly unveiled Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A and barely hitting the 32,000 mark inside a mysterious LG F320 device that we think is the G2. Now, exactly how big is this 11,000 – 13,000 gap between Bay Trail and Snapdragon 800? Massive. Just think of how much zippier the S4 is in real-life use compared with, say, the GS3. Well, that’s how much faster we expect Bay Trail-powered gadgets to be versus the S4 and other current Android giants. And that’s not all. If this new AnTuTu benchmark is legit (that’s a big “if”, remember), the enigmatic Bay Trail-based machine tested had a CPU clocked at just 1.1 GHz at its core. And since Silvermont (that’s another name for Bay Trail, by the way) will have a maximum clock speed of 2.1 GHz, the sky is the limit for the potential performance of a higher clocked SoC. Dayum! The bad news in this entire equation is we have no idea what kind of gadget is this “byt_t_ffrd10” and what company will manufacture it. It does apparently run Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean, which narrows it down a little (Bay Trail will support both Android and Windows 8), but I wouldn’t want to speculate as to the OEM’s name. It could be someone like Samsung, HTC, LG or Sony or it could well be ZTE, Lenovo, Acer or Huawei. Only time will tell. For now, let us look in awe again at that incredible benchmark score and expect the unexpected. ![]() ARM still having Cortex A57 This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jul 5 2013, 12:17 AM |
|
|
Jul 6 2013, 02:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
|
|
|
Jul 6 2013, 03:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,750 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
But both Qualcomm and Intel have only average GPU performance.Most demanding app are game type which use the GPU more than the CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 11:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
599 posts Joined: Jun 2011 From: Perlis |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « hi TS. i copy this info from u will be starting official thread for lenovo k900 n want to use this |
|
|
Aug 18 2013, 09:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
It is the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10 and 8 arrive?
|
|
|
Aug 19 2013, 12:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,750 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
The bigLittle Arm SoC that use dual core cortex A15 and dual core A7 look very interesting to me rather than S4 octa core that seems to be to overkill.
It can be a dual core or quad core.Much more power saving if the implementation is spot on. Considering that most app nowadays only capitalizing on dual core and if needed can turn on all core unlike S4 which is still quad core in reality. Can current quad core SoC be used like that without the bigLittle? |
|
|
Aug 19 2013, 12:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,196 posts Joined: Nov 2012 |
QUOTE(tongaz86 @ Aug 19 2013, 12:33 AM) The bigLittle Arm SoC that use dual core cortex A15 and dual core A7 look very interesting to me rather than S4 octa core that seems to be to overkill. Dual core A15 can compare to Quad Core A9It can be a dual core or quad core.Much more power saving if the implementation is spot on. Considering that most app nowadays only capitalizing on dual core and if needed can turn on all core unlike S4 which is still quad core in reality. Can current quad core SoC be used like that without the bigLittle? |
|
|
Aug 19 2013, 02:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
Smartphone/Tablet processor Teread;War Begun;, new Cortex A12
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2751654&hl= Here to discuss ARM Cortex processor. |
|
|
Sep 18 2013, 02:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
The Bay Trail Preview: Intel Atom Z3770 Tested
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7314/intel-b...om-z3770-tested Bay Trail & Branding ![]() Bay Trail, like all Atom platforms before it, will be available in multiple form factors. Unlike the Atoms of yesterday however, the SoC will carry Pentium and Celeron branding when used in notebooks and desktops. Intel didn’t disclose too much about its Silvermont plans in other form factors other than some basic naming: Basically notebooks ship under the Pentium N3000 & Celeron N2000 series, while desktops will carry Pentium J2000 & Celeron J1000 branding. All Pentium SKUs seem to be quad-core, while Celeron SKUs will be available in both dual and quad-core versions. Thankfully Intel shied away from introducing the same complexity with its tablet focused Bay Trail parts. All Bay Trail tablet SKUs carry Atom branding. There’s the quad-core Z3700 series and the dual-core Z3600 series. |
|
|
Oct 18 2013, 03:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,123 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT |
ASUS TRANSFORMER T100 LANDS ON 18 OCT: POSSIBLY THE FIRST INTEL BAY TRAIL ATOM AND WINDOWS 8.1 DEVICE IN MALAYSIA
http://www.lowyat.net/2013/10/17/14025/asu...ce-in-malaysia/ ![]() This post has been edited by wkkm007: Oct 18 2013, 03:27 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0256sec
0.50
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:13 AM |