Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 IntelAtomSoCAndroid-IA(X86)phone/tab,INTEL inside, SamsungGTab3/FHD-AsusFonepadNote6,MeMO10

views
     
mudkipryan94
post Jun 5 2013, 10:04 AM

someone need a sarcasm meter?
********
All Stars
12,000 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Banting, Puchong, KL



QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Jun 5 2013, 10:02 AM)
they shud release it asap.
later play catch up with Samsung n Motorola X
hard lo.
*
laugh.gif if Intel can, Qualcomm can go home liao laugh.gif
TSwkkm007
post Jun 5 2013, 03:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6 drool.gif

user posted image

Inb4 I read fake note thread

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=4610...epad_note_fhd_6

Datasheet+Views: 483 views since addition of datasheet (June 03, 2013)
Datasheet_State: Incomplete specifications
Expected:Release:Date: July, 2013
Software_Environment
Embedded+Operating:System: Google Android 4.2.2
Browse devices running this OS
Microprocessor,_Chipset
CPU_Clock: 1600 MHz
CPU: Intel Atom Z2560
Browse devices based on this microprocessor
Memory,;Storage_capacity
RAM:capacity: 2 GiB
Display
Display-Type: color Super IPS+ TFT , 16777216 scales
Display+Diagonal: 6 "
Display;Resolution: 1080 x 1920
Sound
Microphone(s): stereo
Microphone-Input: 3.5mm
Loudspeaker(s): stereo
Audio:Output: 3.5mm
Cellular:Phone
Cellular;Networks: GSM850, GSM900, GSM1800, GSM1900, UMTS850 (B5), UMTS900 (B8), UMTS1900 (B2), UMTS2100 (B1)
Cellular:Data-Links: GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+
Call+Alert: 128 -chord melody
Vibrating:Alert: Supported
Speakerphone_: Supported
Control-Peripherals
Positioning;Device: Multi-touch screen
Primary;Keyboard: Not supported
Directional-Pad: Not supported
Scroll:Wheel: Not supported
Interfaces
Expansion-Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash
USB: USB 2.0 client, 480Mbit/s
micro-USB
Bluetooth: No information
Wireless+LAN: 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n
Infrared:Gate: Not supported
Multimedia:Telecommunication
Analog+Radio;Receiver: No information
Digital+Media+Broadcast;Tuner: Not supported
Satellite-Navigation
Built-in-GPS_module: Supported
Complementary;GPS_Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging
Built-in:Digital:Camera
Main+Camera: 8 MP
Autofocus-(AF): Supported
Optical:Zoom: 1 x
Secondary:Camera: 1.2 MP
Additional_Details
Built-in;accelerometer: Supported
Battery: built-in

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jun 5 2013, 03:43 PM
TSwkkm007
post Jun 5 2013, 03:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


Asus MeMO Pad FHD 10 32GB Specs
& Samsung GT-P5200 Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 3G 16GB Specs

oh wai got TF300 edi

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=4608...pad_fhd_10_32gb

Datasheet_Views: 344 views since addition of datasheet (June 03, 2013)
Datasheet;State: Preliminary specifications
Expected_Release_Date: July, 2013
Dimensions: 264.6 x 182.4 x 9.5 millimetres
Mass: 580 grams (battery included)
Software+Environment
Embedded_Operating+System: Google Android 4.2.2
Browse devices running this OS
Microprocessor,-Chipset
CPU:Clock: 1600 MHz
CPU: Intel Atom Z2560
Browse devices based on this microprocessor
Memory,_Storage;capacity
RAM:capacity: 2 GiB
ROM+capacity: 29.8 GiB
Display
Display_Type: color IPS TFT , 16777216 scales
Display+Diagonal: 10.1 "
Display-Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Sound
Microphone(s): stereo
Microphone:Input: 3.5mm
Loudspeaker(s): stereo
Audio_Output: 3.5mm
Control;Peripherals
Positioning;Device: Multi-touch screen
Primary+Keyboard: Not supported
Directional-Pad: Not supported
Scroll+Wheel: Not supported
Interfaces
Expansion+Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash
USB: USB 2.0 client, 480Mbit/s
micro-USB
Bluetooth: Bluetooth 3.0
Wireless+LAN: 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n
Infrared-Gate: Not supported
Multimedia;Telecommunication
Analog-Radio+Receiver: Not supported
Digital:Media_Broadcast_Tuner: Not supported
Satellite-Navigation
Built-in-GPS;module: Supported
Complementary;GPS:Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging
Built-in;Digital_Camera
Main;Camera: 5 MP
Autofocus+(AF): Supported
Optical:Zoom: 1 x
Secondary;Camera: 1.2 MP
Additional_Details
Built-in_accelerometer: Supported
Battery: built-in


http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=4613..._3_10.1_3g_16gb

Datasheet_Views: 242 views since addition of datasheet (June 04, 2013)
Datasheet+State: Preliminary specifications
Expected+Release;Date: July, 2013
Dimensions: 243.1 x 176.1 x 7.95 millimetres
Mass: 510 grams (battery included)
Software+Environment
Embedded_Operating;System: Google Android 4.2.2
Browse devices running this OS
Microprocessor,:Chipset
CPU;Clock: 1600 MHz
CPU: Intel Atom Z2560
Browse devices based on this microprocessor
Memory,-Storage+capacity
RAM:capacity: 1 GiB
ROM_capacity: 14.9 GiB (accessible: 11 GiB)
Display
Display+Type: Supported
Display-Diagonal: 10.1 "
Display-Resolution: 1280 x 800
Video:out: 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution
Sound
Microphone(s): mono
Loudspeaker(s): stereo
Audio-Output: 3.5mm
Cellular_Phone
Cellular_Networks: GSM850, GSM900, GSM1800, GSM1900, UMTS850 (B5), UMTS900 (B8), UMTS1900 (B2), UMTS2100 (B1)
Cellular:Data:Links: GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+
Control_Peripherals
Positioning_Device: Multi-touch screen
Primary:Keyboard: Not supported
Directional+Pad: Not supported
Scroll:Wheel: Not supported
Interfaces
Expansion+Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash, microSDXC
USB: USB 2.0 host/client, 480Mbit/s
micro-USB
Bluetooth: Bluetooth 4.0
Wireless_LAN: 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n
Infrared;Gate: Not supported
Multimedia:Telecommunication
Analog-Radio:Receiver: Not supported
Digital+Media_Broadcast:Tuner: Not supported
Satellite_Navigation
Built-in:GPS:module: Supported
Complementary+GPS-Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging
Built-in+Digital+Camera
Main;Camera: 3.1 MP
Optical+Zoom: 1 x
Secondary-Camera: 1.2 MP
Additional_Details
Built-in:accelerometer: Supported
Battery: built-in
Battery+Capacity: 6800 mAh

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jun 5 2013, 03:46 PM
SyathibiyMegat
post Jun 5 2013, 05:52 PM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Jun 5 2013, 08:24 AM)
I read from GSM arena Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 using atom too
*
That was claimed by Reuters, nothing official. On Samsung's page, it only stated dual-core. I'm assuming it's actly Snapdragon 400
TSwkkm007
post Jun 5 2013, 06:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Jun 5 2013, 03:52 PM)
That was claimed by Reuters, nothing official. On Samsung's page, it only stated dual-core. I'm assuming it's actly Snapdragon 400
*
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/03/samsung-galaxy-tab-3/

Samsung don't use their own Exynos5 cause can't support LTE 4G

Samsung like to use processor from different company
SyathibiyMegat
post Jun 5 2013, 06:25 PM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Jun 5 2013, 06:18 PM)
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/03/samsung-galaxy-tab-3/

Samsung don't use their own Exynos5 cause can't support LTE 4G

Samsung like to use processor from different company
*
That's why I said. Most probably it'll use Qualcomm's. Intel's also hasn't developed LTE yet
TSwkkm007
post Jun 5 2013, 06:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Jun 5 2013, 04:25 PM)
That's why I said. Most probably it'll use Qualcomm's. Intel's also hasn't developed LTE yet
*
For the first time, Kilroy demonstrated Intel's 4G LTE multimode solution in conjunction with the next-generation 22nm quad-core Atom SoC for tablets. The Intel® XMM 7160 is one of the world's smallest4and lowest-power multimode-multiband LTE solutions and will support global LTE roaming in a single SKU.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7009/arm-cor...ng-in-late-2014
SyathibiyMegat
post Jun 5 2013, 07:05 PM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Jun 5 2013, 06:54 PM)
For the first time, Kilroy demonstrated Intel's 4G LTE multimode solution in conjunction with the next-generation 22nm quad-core Atom SoC for tablets. The Intel® XMM 7160 is one of the world's smallest4and lowest-power multimode-multiband LTE solutions and will support global LTE roaming in a single SKU.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7009/arm-cor...ng-in-late-2014
*
It'll not be available anytime soon. Next year, perhaps
TSwkkm007
post Jun 11 2013, 01:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


user posted image
Is the Samsung Galaxy S 4 coming with an Intel mobile chip? (updated)
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/05/intel-samsung-galaxy-s-4/

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jun 11 2013, 01:16 AM
SyathibiyMegat
post Jul 4 2013, 11:34 PM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
First Intel Bay Trail Benchmark Emerges Online, Crushes All of ARM’s Records

So you didn’t buy Intel’s promises of challenging ARM-based mobile processors in terms of raw speed, did you? Well, it’s true, Intel started off rather timidly in the mobile décor, with the low-end Medfield platform, but the Clover Trail+ chip found inside Lenovo’s K900 should have raised a flag or two in the ARM camp.

user posted image

And if we are to trust a newly spotted benchmark, the next generation of processors, codenamed Bay Trail, will step things up quite a lot. What’s “a lot”? Well, I’m going to throw a number at you – 43,416 points.

That’s how much a mystery Android-based gadget running Intel Bay Trail scored in the popular benchmark test called AnTuTu. For comparison, the zippiest ARM-powered CPU around, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800, was seen choking just before reaching 30,000 points inside the newly unveiled Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A and barely hitting the 32,000 mark inside a mysterious LG F320 device that we think is the G2.

Now, exactly how big is this 11,000 – 13,000 gap between Bay Trail and Snapdragon 800? Massive. Just think of how much zippier the S4 is in real-life use compared with, say, the GS3. Well, that’s how much faster we expect Bay Trail-powered gadgets to be versus the S4 and other current Android giants.

And that’s not all. If this new AnTuTu benchmark is legit (that’s a big “if”, remember), the enigmatic Bay Trail-based machine tested had a CPU clocked at just 1.1 GHz at its core. And since Silvermont (that’s another name for Bay Trail, by the way) will have a maximum clock speed of 2.1 GHz, the sky is the limit for the potential performance of a higher clocked SoC. Dayum!

The bad news in this entire equation is we have no idea what kind of gadget is this “byt_t_ffrd10” and what company will manufacture it. It does apparently run Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean, which narrows it down a little (Bay Trail will support both Android and Windows 8), but I wouldn’t want to speculate as to the OEM’s name. It could be someone like Samsung, HTC, LG or Sony or it could well be ZTE, Lenovo, Acer or Huawei. Only time will tell.

For now, let us look in awe again at that incredible benchmark score and expect the unexpected.

user posted image
TSwkkm007
post Jul 5 2013, 12:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Jul 4 2013, 09:34 PM)
First Intel Bay Trail Benchmark Emerges Online, Crushes All of ARM’s Records

So you didn’t buy Intel’s promises of challenging ARM-based mobile processors in terms of raw speed, did you? Well, it’s true, Intel started off rather timidly in the mobile décor, with the low-end Medfield platform, but the Clover Trail+ chip found inside Lenovo’s K900 should have raised a flag or two in the ARM camp.

user posted image

And if we are to trust a newly spotted benchmark, the next generation of processors, codenamed Bay Trail, will step things up quite a lot. What’s “a lot”? Well, I’m going to throw a number at you – 43,416 points.

That’s how much a mystery Android-based gadget running Intel Bay Trail scored in the popular benchmark test called AnTuTu. For comparison, the zippiest ARM-powered CPU around, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 800, was seen choking just before reaching 30,000 points inside the newly unveiled Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A and barely hitting the 32,000 mark inside a mysterious LG F320 device that we think is the G2.

Now, exactly how big is this 11,000 – 13,000 gap between Bay Trail and Snapdragon 800? Massive. Just think of how much zippier the S4 is in real-life use compared with, say, the GS3. Well, that’s how much faster we expect Bay Trail-powered gadgets to be versus the S4 and other current Android giants.

And that’s not all. If this new AnTuTu benchmark is legit (that’s a big “if”, remember), the enigmatic Bay Trail-based machine tested had a CPU clocked at just 1.1 GHz at its core. And since Silvermont (that’s another name for Bay Trail, by the way) will have a maximum clock speed of 2.1 GHz, the sky is the limit for the potential performance of a higher clocked SoC. Dayum!

The bad news in this entire equation is we have no idea what kind of gadget is this “byt_t_ffrd10” and what company will manufacture it. It does apparently run Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean, which narrows it down a little (Bay Trail will support both Android and Windows 8), but I wouldn’t want to speculate as to the OEM’s name. It could be someone like Samsung, HTC, LG or Sony or it could well be ZTE, Lenovo, Acer or Huawei. Only time will tell.

For now, let us look in awe again at that incredible benchmark score and expect the unexpected.

user posted image
*
*I had repost this in my Smartphone/Tablet processor Teread

ARM still having Cortex A57

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Jul 5 2013, 12:17 AM
SyathibiyMegat
post Jul 6 2013, 02:54 AM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Jul 5 2013, 12:11 AM)
*I had repost this in my Smartphone/Tablet processor Teread

ARM still having Cortex A57
*
By the time A57 reaches, Airmont also comes whistling.gif
tongaz86
post Jul 6 2013, 03:07 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,750 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


But both Qualcomm and Intel have only average GPU performance.Most demanding app are game type which use the GPU more than the CPU.


VictorKeong
post Aug 10 2013, 11:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
599 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Perlis


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


hi TS. i copy this info from u
will be starting official thread for lenovo k900 n want to use this smile.gif thxx
TSwkkm007
post Aug 18 2013, 09:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


It is the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10 and 8 arrive?
tongaz86
post Aug 19 2013, 12:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,750 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


The bigLittle Arm SoC that use dual core cortex A15 and dual core A7 look very interesting to me rather than S4 octa core that seems to be to overkill.

It can be a dual core or quad core.Much more power saving if the implementation is spot on. Considering that most app nowadays only capitalizing on dual core and if needed can turn on all core unlike S4 which is still quad core in reality.

Can current quad core SoC be used like that without the bigLittle?
Andrew_1980
post Aug 19 2013, 12:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,196 posts

Joined: Nov 2012


QUOTE(tongaz86 @ Aug 19 2013, 12:33 AM)
The bigLittle Arm SoC that use dual core cortex A15 and dual core A7 look very interesting to me rather than S4 octa core that seems to be to overkill.

It can be a dual core or quad core.Much more power saving if the implementation is spot on. Considering that most app nowadays only capitalizing on dual core and if needed can turn on all core unlike S4 which is still quad core in reality.

Can current quad core SoC be used like that without the bigLittle?
*
Dual core A15 can compare to Quad Core A9
TSwkkm007
post Aug 19 2013, 02:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


Smartphone/Tablet processor Teread;War Begun;, new Cortex A12
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2751654&hl=
Here to discuss ARM Cortex processor.
TSwkkm007
post Sep 18 2013, 02:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


The Bay Trail Preview: Intel Atom Z3770 Tested
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7314/intel-b...om-z3770-tested

Bay Trail & Branding

user posted image

Bay Trail, like all Atom platforms before it, will be available in multiple form factors. Unlike the Atoms of yesterday however, the SoC will carry Pentium and Celeron branding when used in notebooks and desktops. Intel didn’t disclose too much about its Silvermont plans in other form factors other than some basic naming:

Basically notebooks ship under the Pentium N3000 & Celeron N2000 series, while desktops will carry Pentium J2000 & Celeron J1000 branding. All Pentium SKUs seem to be quad-core, while Celeron SKUs will be available in both dual and quad-core versions.

Thankfully Intel shied away from introducing the same complexity with its tablet focused Bay Trail parts. All Bay Trail tablet SKUs carry Atom branding. There’s the quad-core Z3700 series and the dual-core Z3600 series.
TSwkkm007
post Oct 18 2013, 03:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


ASUS TRANSFORMER T100 LANDS ON 18 OCT: POSSIBLY THE FIRST INTEL BAY TRAIL ATOM AND WINDOWS 8.1 DEVICE IN MALAYSIA

http://www.lowyat.net/2013/10/17/14025/asu...ce-in-malaysia/

user posted image

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Oct 18 2013, 03:27 PM

4 Pages « < 2 3 4Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0256sec    0.50    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:13 AM