Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 IntelAtomSoCAndroid-IA(X86)phone/tab,INTEL inside, SamsungGTab3/FHD-AsusFonepadNote6,MeMO10

views
     
TSwkkm007
post Mar 28 2013, 03:25 AM, updated 13y ago

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


Intel Atom Inside thumbup.gif
Saltwell core, PowerVR SGX xxx,1.x++ GHz

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/sma...martphones.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(system_on_chip)
QUOTE
In 2012, Intel expanded the Atom processor family with a new system on chip (SoC) platform designed for smartphones and tablets.[1] It is a continuation of the partnership announced by Intel and Google on 13 September 2011, to provide support for the Android operating system on Intel x86 processors.[2]

Atom competes with existing SoCs developed for the smartphone and tablet market from companies like Texas instruments, Nvidia, Qualcomm and Samsung.[3] Unlike these companies, which use ARM-based CPUs designed from the beginning to consume very low power, Intel has adapted the x86 based Atom line CPU developed for low power usage in netbooks, to even lower power usage.

In April 2012, several manufacturers have released Intel Atom-based phones; as a result of testing industry reviewers came to conclusion that Atom SoC-based smartphones can compete both power-wise and performance-wise with currently dominating ARM-based smartphones


Asus Fonepad Note FHD 6
Asus MeMO Pad FHD 10
Samsung GT-P5200 Galaxy Tab 3 10.1
Lenovo K900
Asus FonePad ME371MG
Acer Liquid C1
Lenovo K800
Motorola RAZR i XT890
Lava Xolo X1000

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android-x86
QUOTE
Android-IA
A derivation of the project, Android-IA[2] has been produced by Intel.[3] The project states that its intention is to port Android on to x86-based mobile platforms, such as the Intel Medfield architecture.


Sos:http://www.intel.my/content/www/us/en/smar...martphones.html
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=i2560z...ntel_atom_z2560
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdamaster&posted=1&cpu=i2580z
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdamaster&posted=1&cpu=i2480z
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdamaster&posted=1&cpu=i2460z
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdamaster&posted=1&cpu=i2420z
Atom (system on chip)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_(system_on_chip)
http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/27/2828158/...admap-14nm-2014
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/inte...atom_processors
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/column/...806_307443.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel...roarchitectures

Smartphone/Tablet processor Teread;War begain;, [Atom],Krait,Tegra4,Exynos5,A9600,OMAP5
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2751654&hl=

Older device that using Intel Processor
Mobile Internet device
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Internet_device

Update
QUOTE
The Bay Trail Preview: Intel Atom Z3770 Tested
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7314/intel-b...om-z3770-tested

Bay Trail & Branding

user posted image

Bay Trail, like all Atom platforms before it, will be available in multiple form factors. Unlike the Atoms of yesterday however, the SoC will carry Pentium and Celeron branding when used in notebooks and desktops. Intel didn’t disclose too much about its Silvermont plans in other form factors other than some basic naming:

Basically notebooks ship under the Pentium N3000 & Celeron N2000 series, while desktops will carry Pentium J2000 & Celeron J1000 branding. All Pentium SKUs seem to be quad-core, while Celeron SKUs will be available in both dual and quad-core versions.

Thankfully Intel shied away from introducing the same complexity with its tablet focused Bay Trail parts. All Bay Trail tablet SKUs carry Atom branding. There’s the quad-core Z3700 series and the dual-core Z3600 series.


user posted image
user posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted imageuser posted image

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Sep 18 2013, 08:28 PM
SyathibiyMegat
post Mar 28 2013, 04:46 AM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
Which one is on par with Snapdragon 600?
TheMrBinary
post Mar 28 2013, 06:31 AM

63 72 69 70 70 6c 69 6e 67 20 64 65 70 72 65 73 73 69 6f 6e
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: 27.132481, 73.086548


Lenovo K900 ?
trippin2
post Mar 28 2013, 10:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
will these run the apps on google play without problems? Anyone actually own one and tried?
andyjyneo
post Mar 28 2013, 10:29 PM

LineageOS 20.0
*******
Senior Member
7,671 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Getting more and more chip makers coming out to fight in mobile world nowadays.

Qualcomm Snapdragon, Mediatek MTK, Samseng Exynos, NVIDIA Tegra, and now Intel.
When is AMD's turn? Damn...
Azureknight94
post Mar 28 2013, 10:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,667 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Mar 28 2013, 10:29 PM)
Getting more and more chip makers coming out to fight in mobile world nowadays.

Qualcomm Snapdragon, Mediatek MTK, Samseng Exynos, NVIDIA Tegra, and now Intel.
When is AMD's turn? Damn...
*
While everyone is crowding here, amd go monopolise console section tongue.gif xbox 720 and ps4. I think enough makan rather than coming to mobile section have to compete with so many. Especially qualcomm who are on a roll right now with good performance to power saving ratio.
andyjyneo
post Mar 28 2013, 10:51 PM

LineageOS 20.0
*******
Senior Member
7,671 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Azureknight94 @ Mar 28 2013, 10:49 PM)
While everyone is crowding here, amd go monopolise console section tongue.gif xbox 720 and ps4. I think enough makan rather than coming to mobile section have to compete with so many. Especially qualcomm who are on a roll right now with good performance to power saving ratio.
*
True, fully agree with you.
AMD is making a big loss since Intel reborn.
Now hoping that monopolise (sorry, I mean providing to) consoles will bring profits back to them.

This post has been edited by andyjyneo: Mar 28 2013, 10:52 PM
SyathibiyMegat
post Mar 29 2013, 05:09 AM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Mar 28 2013, 10:29 PM)
Getting more and more chip makers coming out to fight in mobile world nowadays.

Qualcomm Snapdragon, Mediatek MTK, Samseng Exynos, NVIDIA Tegra, and now Intel.
When is AMD's turn? Damn...
*
Nvidia should just focus on GPU, no?
TSwkkm007
post Mar 29 2013, 02:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2751654&hl=

War on mobile smartphone processor
SyathibiyMegat
post Apr 3 2013, 12:10 AM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
Fuuuu, did you guys see yet the performance on K900? Damn sweat.gif
TSwkkm007
post Apr 4 2013, 12:25 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(SyathibiyMegat @ Apr 2 2013, 10:10 PM)
Fuuuu, did you guys see yet the performance on K900? Damn sweat.gif
*
Galaxy S4 vs IdeaPhone K900: Lenovo Intel-based smartphone matches Samsung’s flagship in benchmark tests
http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-s4-...k-tests-183596/
andyjyneo
post Apr 4 2013, 12:36 AM

LineageOS 20.0
*******
Senior Member
7,671 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Wah, Intel Atom quad-core is so powerful to even whack Exynos quad-core?
Sure or not?
TSwkkm007
post Apr 4 2013, 12:46 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Apr 3 2013, 10:36 PM)
Wah, Intel Atom quad-core is so powerful to even whack Exynos quad-core?
Sure or not?
*
user posted image
user posted image

S4 got two version
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa (8 core) 4 Cortex-A15 +4 Cortex-A7 = 27417
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 (4 core) = 25900

big.LITTLE - eg: Samsung Exynos 5
big.LITTLE is a heterogeneous computing architecture developed by ARM Holdings coupling slower, low-power processor cores with more powerful and power-hungry ones. The intention is to create a multi-core processor that can adjust better to dynamic computing needs and use less power than clock scaling alone. big.LITTLE was announced in October 2011 along with the Cortex-A7, which was designed to be architecturally compatible with the Cortex-A15.[1] In October 2012 ARM announced the Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57 ARMv8 cores, which are also compatible with each other to allow their use in a big.LITTLE chip.[2]

IdeaPhone K900 = 25827
Dual-core 2GHz Intel Atom Clover Trail+ processor, PowerVR SGX 544 MP2 GPU and 2GB of RAM

Smartphone/Tablet processor Teread;War begain;, [Atom],Krait,Tegra4,Exynos5,A9600,OMAP5
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2751654&hl=

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Apr 4 2013, 12:55 AM
andyjyneo
post Apr 4 2013, 12:48 AM

LineageOS 20.0
*******
Senior Member
7,671 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Apr 4 2013, 12:46 AM)
user posted image
user posted image
*
Yup, I saw the benchmark, but I still can't believe it.
Intel being a 'new player' in mobile market already can turn the table upside down?
Wah, this is hard to believe.
JayceOoi
post Apr 4 2013, 12:52 AM

Pro Blogger
*******
Senior Member
2,741 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
Can't wait to hand on them. wink.gif
TSwkkm007
post Apr 4 2013, 01:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Apr 3 2013, 10:48 PM)
Yup, I saw the benchmark, but I still can't believe it.
Intel being a 'new player' in mobile market already can turn the table upside down?
Wah, this is hard to believe.
*
INTEL are taiko bro
Azureknight94
post Apr 4 2013, 01:05 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,667 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


Great that Intel are able to provide some competition to qualcomm and exynos. This will promote even fiercer competition between them to produce the best chip and we just get to choose and enjoy faster devices with better battery life. biggrin.gif
TSwkkm007
post Apr 4 2013, 02:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: OUG - Muhibbah LRT


QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Apr 3 2013, 10:48 PM)
Yup, I saw the benchmark, but I still can't believe it.
Intel being a 'new player' in mobile market already can turn the table upside down?
Wah, this is hard to believe.
*
http://www.gizmag.com/intel-moorestown-smartphones/13837/
Intel Moorestown platform to drive smartphones in 2010

Intel not 1st time produce smartphone processor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Intern...l_MID_platforms

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Apr 4 2013, 02:38 AM
jimlim007
post Apr 4 2013, 08:24 AM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Apr 4 2013, 12:36 AM)
Wah, Intel Atom quad-core is so powerful to even whack Exynos quad-core?
Sure or not?
*
Dual-core only la bro 2GHz Intel Atom Clover Trail+ processor tongue.gif

if Intel Quad Core, whack all the rest of chips already laugh.gif
SyathibiyMegat
post Apr 4 2013, 04:30 PM

Linguistics
*******
Senior Member
2,634 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(andyjyneo @ Apr 4 2013, 12:36 AM)
Wah, Intel Atom quad-core is so powerful to even whack Exynos quad-core?
Sure or not?
*
QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Apr 4 2013, 08:24 AM)
Dual-core only la bro 2GHz Intel Atom Clover Trail+ processor  tongue.gif

if Intel Quad Core, whack all the rest of chips already  laugh.gif
*
And with HT of course. If not, Intel won't be able to produce like that

4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0199sec    0.37    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 01:03 PM