HT/Hyper-threading just split 1 physical core to 2 thread

For each processor core that is physically present, the operating system addresses two virtual or logical cores, and shares the workload between them when possible. The main function of hyper-threading is to decrease the number of dependent instructions on the pipeline. It takes advantage of superscalar architecture (multiple instructions operating on separate data in parallel). They appear to the OS as two processors, thus the OS can schedule two processes at once. In addition two or more processes can use the same resources. If one process fails then the resources can be readily re-allocated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper-threading

Ya, can see that. Now they're feeding Samsung to start Tizen.
If they're successful, might pose a big threat to Android.

But AnTuTu said quad-core. That's why I'm quite shocked.
Intel Atom on netbooks also don't have quad-core woh.

They appear to the OS as two core (for each physical core) , OS senang tipu 1 user pun kena tipu

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Apr 4 2013, 05:28 PM

Who else known better how to create a better processor rather than the master itself?

That K900's design looks so gooding

AMD=apple la man....

Yes, kena tipu.

True, very true. A very fierce competition indeed.

Wow,I'm impressed with Intel now

Will INTEL too late enter the Smartphone market?
From Multi Chip Solution to System on a Chip (SoC)
Multi Chip device bulky EG (fat version iPAD Clone) lol

Hey Guys, I update with lot of Pic/drilz about Intel Atom
on 1st post

This post has been edited by wkkm007: Apr 4 2013, 06:08 PM

Not even my notebook. Still using i3

Seriously, I don't like the idea of quad-core; just not yet. For now, only improve the performance of the processor and also increase the clock speed. Smartphone isn't ready for quad-core. I really hope Motorola will be using Intel dual-core; and of course with Android. Intel + Android = win

This post has been edited by SyathibiyMegat: Apr 4 2013, 08:16 PM

Sorry, very soon, your dream of Intel + Android will be Intel + Samsung very soon.
I don't know what motive Intel is making here...

And what abt that? I thought Samsung already has its own processor; Exynos?

Ya, correct, but they're cooperating with Intel to produce Tizen.

april 17th K900 $480 ^^

" Lenovo is going to launch K900 in April, which is said as the fastest smartphone this year. It can be so true, since Lenovo K900 powered by the 2 GHz dual-core Intel Atom Z2580 (Clover Trail+) processor with SGX544-MP2 dual-core graphics. "

Source : http://www.techauthors.me/2013/01/exclusiv...hmarks.html?m=1

This post has been edited by TheMrBinary: Apr 4 2013, 10:17 PM

Ahhh...so Exynos 5410 will still have upper hand in GPU section with its PowerVR SGX544 MP3, if their Antutu score was a tied up, it means Intel are indeed superior in terms of CPU.

Another thing this Atom clovertrail+ lacks off is LTE.
with Intel expensive chip price(just an assumption based on PC chips) compared to ARM.
and lacks of LTE, many manufacturer will not be using this for their flagship phones.

and also power consumption. no Intel SoC device for me, if ARM never exist, I rather hope for AMD SoC than expensive Intel.


ARM also fight in cloud server segment with Intel, only 5w per QC processor.

Source?

Why would they use Intel btw?

Read here and here.
More links will be provided if you're not convinced.

Samsung has the backing from Intel on this Tizen.
Samsung may jumpship to Tizen if Google treats them unfairly.
It's just a matter of time only, with the Motorola X Phone is coming out soon.