QUOTE(yklooi @ May 19 2013, 01:22 AM)
talking abt bond, comparing the performance, risk ratings, RHB bond is better than Ambond, y FSM recommend ambond but not RHB bond?

could it be the inside??? type of bond grade it holds? where to see more instead of just outside?
guess i found the reason

..but it is a bit late..i went into it alredy
taken from FSM 7 Jan 2013 writing
"As for RHB Bond Fund, the manager engages in active trading to generate returns for investors, as evident from the frequent changes in the fund’s top holdings. For example, its largest allocation was in Tanjung Bin Energy Issuer Berhad at 18.20% of the fund’s net asset value (NAV) in end-Jun 2012 before being replaced by Kimanis Power Sdn Bhd (14.15% of NAV) in end-Sep 2012, and subsequently Weststar Capital Sdn Bhd (18.68% of NAV) in end-Nov 2012. As a result, its portfolio turnover ratio rose to 2.31X as per its annual report dated 30-September 2012.
Despite the fund’s recent strong performance, we are rather concerned on the fund’s concentrated exposure to the downgraded Ample Zone paper valued at RM5 million, or 11.9% of the fund NAV (as at 30 November 2012). The bonds are classified as a receivable in its book currently and thus we advice investors to exercise caution."
This post has been edited by yklooi: May 19 2013, 05:18 PM