Um, this isn't /k/ ...

Here a lots of fanboys. That's the truth. Even when other reviewers (that have the actual phone in hand and used it) report something that against their beloved phone..they will scream BIASED...(and they haven't even have the phone yet)

Yes , can see that in Nexus 4 and Xperia Z threads. I think I am only one of the few talking negative stuffs about these phones and what I said is true based on my experience using them
I am no fanboy of any brand though I used many Samsung phones and seriously I have no major complains except for only Galaxy S which I openly said is the worst Android phone in my list

king?i guess suck phone?

But I suppose both of those phones (Nexus 4, XZ) have one thing in common - that "design" is one of the key selling points of the device. It seems once the word "premium design" or "sexy design" is part of the marketing, you probably start having irrational fanboyism. I recall LG liked to market the heck out of every teensy weensy insignificant feature about 5+ years ago ... pink phone for ladies with all the floral stuff, the twistable camera so you can take shots of yourself and they used a pair of tango dancers for that ad....

Samsung has never been much about design but functionality.

I am not defending Samsung but saying that some here value functionality over aesthetics, while others are the opposite. I am also offering my 2 cents about why some threads attract more fanboyism than others. I may be wrong and welcome correction.

x habis2 lagi dgn 41MP dia

I love your review of Xperia Z, you the true reviewer that saying the truth, I hate those fans boy always said positive things on it own lovely brand and model. What the point, it was cheat itself.

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Mar 15 2013, 08:36 PM

I think so.... no surprise, Samsung always did the best for inter-hardware.

And I still really love what Samsung enhance on it software part.

BUT.................... Samsung outer-hardware & design is suck, no choice, I need to give up on S4 because of it same design and same material use.

So..the mystery have been unveiled and now we can sit back and wait for hands on review later on.
Also..waiting for the One to arrive here..lolz

This post has been edited by waveweaver: Mar 15 2013, 08:43 PM

Base on previous labelling.

I believe I9505 is LTE edition where I9500 is normal non LTE edition.
(S III I9305 is LTE, I9300 is non LTE)

USA variant always in different model label.
(S III USA model is T999 and I747)

This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Mar 15 2013, 08:56 PM

terms on hardware yes.design always fail.
htc n sony done better

You seen wrongly, it category under 40k++ but it never get that score.

They better have higher sales figures than S4 then...

i cant brain y

I think susah la, Samsung marketing too crazy, a lot user never seen online review like us, they only seen advertisement, everywhere was Samsung.

At least this year, Sony keep advertised.

HTC wise, one also never seen!

ya lor.error maybe?

n i dunno what is so special about samsung. people get get crazy over it but i cant feel anything special.haha

i like the spec from s4 , great job

I also don't know la...not good enough..maybe