It is seriously not as simple as that, if government is to ensure fairness to those who contributed into EPF all this while, vs moving forward. (just extending retirement age, we are lucky to have EPF thought it trough and created the 3rd account of Account Emas, and this is a very simple employment change in grand scheme of things).
Take a simple example. 401K is voluntary, and no one forces the employee nor employers.
EPF is forced upon most employees and employers, and is on all income and most benefits the employee receive.
Would gov be so kind to change this part of the rule, and I am sure half the employers will stop contributing.
If EPF is to follow 401K method, then should it not be voluntary? The poor surely will not bother to contribute.
else, make all EPF contribution be tax-free and then tax later with penalty (but think about this first and see who will benefits more).
and there are plenty of other issues but really no point enumerating as we are just discussing for fun.
obviously a total revamp of the system is impractical... but to adopt some of the ideas and concepts should be doable
but really the current shitty situation is gov shedding it's responsibility...