Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

73 Pages « < 55 56 57 58 59 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 EPF DIVIDEND, EPF

views
     
Wedchar2912
post Mar 1 2025, 07:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(virtualgay @ Mar 1 2025, 06:41 PM)
Btw withdrawal for above 1M is going to change under Ria framework so don't be so happy if you hit 1M.

I remember we need 1.3M and above before can withdraw but can't remember the timeline
*
3 years starting next year.
ie 2026: 1.1
2027: 1.2
2028: 1.3


while very annoyed at this, hopefully for most of us, this incremental 0.1m is a rounding error vs our networth.... so relatively speaking, may not be so annoying.
btw, only relevant to those below 55 years old.

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Mar 1 2025, 07:44 PM
Wedchar2912
post Mar 1 2025, 08:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(nexona88 @ Mar 1 2025, 08:02 PM)
Nowadays everything needs apps

Banking, ASNB, EPF,  various Socmed, Telco, local council, parking, e-wallet etc.
*
roadtax and driving license.
Wedchar2912
post Mar 1 2025, 10:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(lee82gx @ Mar 1 2025, 09:39 PM)
For those who are not near 55, yet near to 1m it is a very annoying thing.
Especially if you are have plans to retire early.

You know why? The last statement by EPF saying they will revise the 1.3M figure upon review come 2028.

In my personal case, it’s a chase I don’t think I’m willing to participate in for voluntary contribution. I may be permanently parking anything from 100k to 1.3M if they decide to raise it by 100k every year from now on, since I am 43. Assuming I have 100k per annum of spare money to save. This annoyance is real.
*
yeah, concur. the limit is not supposed to be static; expect it to increase... simplisticly, it will keep on increasing by 100K or something along the line of 6% thereabout.

However, for consideration. If you are planning to work till 55, your salary deduction + employer contribution + 5 to 6% div, the yearly 100K limit increase may not matter much. Especially if you expect have 1 to 1.3 million in EPF by 2028. ie, your balance in epf will keep on going up really.

Plus, 43 + 4 years = 47 is not far from 50 years old. At 50, you can take out all from Account 2. That gives you some leeway.


Regardless, I fully agree with you that this limit increase is super annoying. super... (my point: what makes EPF thinks it is their duty to dictate to someone with 1.0 million in epf what to do with their money)
Wedchar2912
post Mar 2 2025, 01:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(kevyeoh @ Mar 2 2025, 01:09 PM)
Just my 2 cents...

Cent #1 - Those who get to reach rm1mil or more at a young age (without self contribution top up) usually means that person is already doing quite well and no need to rely on EPF... Usually will not want to withdraw money out also...

Cent #2 - In the first place, EPF is meant for retirement use and the cap of 1mil before allowing to withdraw excess amount is set long time ago so maybe last time can say rm1mil in EPF more than enough to retire. But nowadays most likely rm1mil alone might not be enough so I can understand why they wanna increase to rm1.3mil.... this policy allows some flexibility to withdraw out your retirement money while at the same time ensures that when you reach 55 years old still got money to spend also... As for why 1.3 and not 1.1 or 1.5m? I don't have access to the data and decision making process... 😊
*
maybe this analogy can shed some light...

I don't speed when I drive. Its just a choice. So does this mean I should be ok for the gov to install hardware limitation to limit all vehicles to max 110 km/h?

(ops... maybe I should support this... haha)
Wedchar2912
post Mar 2 2025, 06:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(beLIEve @ Mar 2 2025, 06:25 PM)
that's my guess too. Maybe even underpaid dividend. Payout higher than ASB1 considered very give face already.
*
whistling.gif previous reserve is still kept... icon_rolleyes.gif
Wedchar2912
post Mar 2 2025, 07:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(kevyeoh @ Mar 2 2025, 07:11 PM)
your analogy totally not related in my opinion... just my opinion...
you are free to drive any time you want in the first place.....

the analogy for car would be...

you are forced to allocate some of your petrol and put it away whenever you pump full tank for your car...
but once you put away enough barrels of petrol, you can choose to use the additional petrol however you like.... doesn't matter if you plan to drive more or speed or not....
but maybe many years down the road...the petrol cost is no longer cheap...so the cap limit to store the extra petrol is added to ensure you still have enough petrol to use later on...
*
I have completely no idea what your analogy is saying.... haha. but sure, if others understand it, it is good.
Wedchar2912
post Mar 2 2025, 11:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(kevyeoh @ Mar 2 2025, 11:23 PM)
I understand his analogy but i think it's totally not related la....
i think he understood mine also but maybe mine more correct so he refuse to admit and say he understood it... haha... is okay...for discussion sake only... i'm not here to win any argument but just share opinions...  biggrin.gif
*
why would I lie about not understanding your analogy?

but sure... since you insist, your analogy is the superior one and more correct. rclxms.gif
Wedchar2912
post Mar 2 2025, 11:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(romuluz777 @ Mar 2 2025, 11:28 PM)
Oh well it is what it is, nothin' much can be done about it.
*
this is definitely true.... for whatever reason EPF (after being tainted by the current government) somehow think they should and control the limit even for those clearly in the T01 grouping (as per EPF definition). Baby sitting these T01 also... these guys don't need their supervision really...

and like you said, at the same time and on the other hand, create account 3 and let those, who should not have access to said retirement EPF due to low balances, the ability to withdraw. Baffling to me...

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Mar 2 2025, 11:36 PM
Wedchar2912
post Mar 3 2025, 01:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(chongyang @ Mar 3 2025, 01:09 PM)
Yup the expenses actually starts counting at retirement age + 1 (assuming by 60 you are still working, and you start relying on epf at first month of 61)

In the breakdown, the greyed out expenses are actually not counted, but act as a preview of how expenses hike up under the influence of inflation. Only the year with red expenses are deducted.

user posted image
*
if your forecast is realistic, then you are definitely an atypical chap.... 24K salary but expenditure only 6K.

not impossible, but need to be cognizant of this low spending level. very rare.
Wedchar2912
post Mar 3 2025, 01:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(fuzzy @ Mar 3 2025, 01:24 PM)
I think the forecast is just for spending post retirement, which should significantly fall given the loss of income, and presumably fewer big ticket items by then.
*
yeah, i just realized that also after inputting some numbers in...

i was wondering how come the EPF balance increase so much before retirement age... my bad for not reading the rules. (was testing with a FIRED person's parameter)

unfortunately, then this calculator is not very intuitive for those who currently not working but before retirement age.
Wedchar2912
post Mar 3 2025, 09:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(nexona88 @ Mar 3 2025, 09:55 PM)
98% payout ratio only could mean that the "buffer $$$"  for 2025 dividend is low side...

No wonder EPF boss & some analyst already gave "advance warning" of not hopping another "excellent dividend rates" for 2025....
*
well, they already kept the almost 10% income of 2023.... that is still being kept... so, its not like they don't have the buffer for 2025....


Wedchar2912
post Mar 3 2025, 10:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(nexona88 @ Mar 3 2025, 10:00 PM)
But 2022 payout ratio is like 105% oohh...

So 2023 one needs to cover back? No?

🤔🧐
*
you have to go back many years and see how many years the payout ratio is above 100%. its quite rare actually...

I looked it up a while back... but no longer have the data with me.

this post alone already shown what it is usually like... most years have reserve.

QUOTE(kechung @ Mar 3 2025, 09:20 AM)
user posted image

for 2024 figures, 1250b is total investment assets instead of AUM & 74.46b is total investment income instead of net income.
*
This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Mar 3 2025, 10:06 PM
Wedchar2912
post Mar 3 2025, 10:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(statikinetic @ Mar 3 2025, 10:09 PM)
From the data, the payout ratio looks to be a....non-issue.
*
if the concern is about overpaying, fully agree...

what about if the concern is about underpaying? ie what does underpaying mean for the EPF members?
Wedchar2912
post Mar 3 2025, 10:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(statikinetic @ Mar 3 2025, 10:28 PM)
Depends on where we draw the line on what constitutes underpaying. And then the strategy.
Perhaps EPF has identified an opportunity in the coming year which it needs a fund pool of a certain size to capitalize. An argument can be made to underpay a certain year in to keep funds available for better profits for members in a coming year.
I'm merely speculating on one such scenario. There could be many levers and factors around the payout ratio which the appreciation is beyond me.
*
understand and agree with your points. possible...

but it also begs the question of whether this effectively means EPF is "robbing from Peter to pay Paul"...
the current EPF members, Peters, are underpaid whenever the payout ratio was too low... like 90%. that is kept...
So when will EPF then pay out these reserve to pay Pauls, future EPF members?

Peter and Paul are EPF members but of different years btw. hence they are strictly not the same members
Wedchar2912
post Mar 6 2025, 02:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(CoffeeDude @ Mar 6 2025, 10:41 AM)

*
well... last year, the economists explained how the shariah components did so so so very well due to the foreign equity exposure to tech stocks...

this year (of course it has only been 2 months), the tech stocks are really not doing so well... like really not well.

so... what does this mean for the shariah pot?



Wedchar2912
post Mar 6 2025, 02:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(batman1172 @ Mar 6 2025, 02:53 PM)
It says here that it comes from manipulation but I’m no expert to comment.
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2025...-previous-years
*
Love their logic.

All funds should be payout 100% income.
so yeah, 80% payout is a much worse manipulation vs 98%.
but the key point is both 80 and 98 are manipulation.

Haha.

By right, they should make a lot of noise when it was 80%. Not when it's 98%.

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Mar 6 2025, 03:02 PM
Wedchar2912
post Mar 7 2025, 01:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(PJusa @ Mar 7 2025, 01:07 PM)
You guys need to understand why they cannot pay out all of each year's dividident for conventional saving. The answer is the 2.5% guaranteed interest for starters. This creates a need for a buffer for a worst case scenario. The second answer is that EPF and its very purpose need relatively stable returns to provide some sort of calculability of the annual dividend for people who use the dividident for their retirement expenditure. It's simply put stupid if one year is 8 then next is 3 percent when you are retired unless the dividend far surpasses your needs (which will not be the case for >90% of EPF members).
Lastly: EPF also needs to cover operational expenditures.

Same applies for Shariah-Savings too just minus the 2.5% part.

All three aspects combined explain why the payouts are the way they are and that is a good thing.

You need to remind yourself that EPF money is simply put NOT an ETF or any sort of pure 100% undiluted direct investment like buying a share or whatever.

Also they dont rob anyone of "their" profits. If you think like that you are using the wrong vehicle for your money.

If you want something different, invest accordingly.
*
may I ask where did the 2.5% guaranteed interest come from? in finance, this guarantee is not provided by EPF, but by Federal gov of Malaysia. So for EPF, this guarantee does not factor in for distribution of return as div.

The stability of return comes from the oversized pot of the MGS/MGII that is being held by EPF. EPF's mandate is not to artifically smooth out the div rate... so you know.
Wedchar2912
post Mar 7 2025, 03:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(PJusa @ Mar 7 2025, 02:30 PM)
I would say this can be derived from the act for example Section 27 (3); Section 50 (2). And I am sure that the guarantee is a factor. As a pension fund things work a little different from an ETF. It's that simple. And there are many advantages of having the money in EPF instead of another investment outside the pure dividend too.
*
maybe I can learn something new...

can share where in Section 27 (3); Section 50 (2) that says the guarantee of 2.5% is from underpaying the EPF members their dividend? (ie payout ratio lesser than 100%). ie purposely underpaying to keep reserve?

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Mar 7 2025, 03:14 PM
Wedchar2912
post Mar 7 2025, 03:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Cubalagi @ Mar 7 2025, 03:15 PM)
2.5% guarantee is from the EPF act.

Only if the EPF doesnt have the funds to pay the 2.5%, the goverment will step in and advance the funds to EPF. This advance has to be paid back by EPF "as soon as practicable".
*
bingo... that was what I was trying to show to PJusa.

the 2.5% guarantee has to come from somewhere... and it will come from Federal Gov of Malaysia.

in Finance, a guarantee has come from a third party... Its not like you and I talking and then I say .... don't worry, I guarantee you that you get 100 rm... that guarantee is not a guarantee... at most it is a promise.
Wedchar2912
post Mar 7 2025, 06:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,688 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(plc255 @ Mar 7 2025, 06:19 PM)
Putting this down for future reference.

user posted image

Source of data :-
https://www.kwsp.gov.my/en/w/epf-declares-6...anan-shariah-fn

EPF SOCIAL PROTECTION INSIGHT VOL 5 2021 - Appendix H
https://www.kwsp.gov.my/en/corporate/news-h...ts/publications

The State of the Nation: Putting old-age security within reach of Malaysians without public pension, RM1 mil savings - Cindy Yeap / The Edge Malaysia 06 Dec 2021
https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/state-n...pension-rm1-mil
*
tq... looking forward to see how many people with more than 10 million this round... icon_idea.gif

73 Pages « < 55 56 57 58 59 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0518sec    0.89    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 07:17 PM