pass this sukuk for the time being
NEW SUKUK : DANAINFRA NASIONAL, >>> worth to buy?
NEW SUKUK : DANAINFRA NASIONAL, >>> worth to buy?
|
|
Oct 28 2013, 09:18 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
good for as-long-can-make-profit investors
pass this sukuk for the time being |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 12:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,142 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Sin City |
I also skip this for now
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 08:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,943 posts Joined: Mar 2012 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Rm100/unit, i see why people not interested
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 09:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,459 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 09:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
17,873 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
I will skip this one.
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 09:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,943 posts Joined: Mar 2012 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(topearn @ Oct 29 2013, 09:13 AM) U mean it's too expensive ? U need to buy min 10 lots so RM1,000 is the minimum. So U think people cannot afford RM1,000 as if they buy Caring, min 100 units only RM125 ? Very sensitive word and you can keep it for yourself.my meaning is , with rm100/unit, investors still have better option to look for. But "Not Affordable"? |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 11:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,001 posts Joined: May 2013 |
I will apply
|
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 12:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,459 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(peri peri @ Oct 29 2013, 09:20 AM) Very sensitive word and you can keep it for yourself. Sorry, I misunderstood U. U can't compare a bond vs a share - they are different things. For this bond, min units to buy is only 10, so min is RM1000. For shares min is 100 units, so if for UMW O&G, its RM250.my meaning is , with rm100/unit, investors still have better option to look for. But "Not Affordable"? Similarly U can't say FD is expensive as min to start a FD is usually RM1000, but savings accounts, usually just RM10 will do. Bonds need to have min RM1,000 else it is just not worth the time spent to buy cos U earn just RM45.80 yearly interest, so there really is not worth the effort if they allow min 1 unit of RM100 as then U only get RM4.58 per year interest. |
|
|
Oct 29 2013, 01:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,943 posts Joined: Mar 2012 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(topearn @ Oct 29 2013, 12:01 PM) Sorry, I misunderstood U. U can't compare a bond vs a share - they are different things. For this bond, min units to buy is only 10, so min is RM1000. For shares min is 100 units, so if for UMW O&G, its RM250. No need sorry bro. Im learning from u too Similarly U can't say FD is expensive as min to start a FD is usually RM1000, but savings accounts, usually just RM10 will do. Bonds need to have min RM1,000 else it is just not worth the time spent to buy cos U earn just RM45.80 yearly interest, so there really is not worth the effort if they allow min 1 unit of RM100 as then U only get RM4.58 per year interest. Bonds remind me of leyman brothers |
|
|
Oct 31 2013, 10:11 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
97 posts Joined: Jun 2011 |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2013, 10:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,459 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(peri peri @ Oct 29 2013, 01:22 PM) U can't compare this Malaysian government guaranteed bond vs Leyman Bros. If U can't trust the government then U should also not trust putting your money with the banks which is also guarantee by the govt. |
|
|
Oct 31 2013, 11:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,001 posts Joined: May 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 31 2013, 12:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,459 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(wil-i-am @ Oct 31 2013, 11:36 AM) Agree. Bank deposits (up to a certain limit, probably RM100,000) guarantee by a company call PIDM which is owned by the government while this sukuk is guarantee by government...same iron-clad guarantee...both by govt....so your principal it's perfectly safe. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2013, 11:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
834 posts Joined: Jun 2012 From: ~Heaven~ |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Oct 27 2013, 11:38 AM) 1)&2) Bond always being redeemed at face value, disregard the market price. The tenure is 15 years, so i have to wait until 15 years in order to get my profit?3) Yes, but market generally taking into account already, the bond won't be traded at Rm90, if it is going to be matured tomorrow. Who is the water fish to sell at Rm90, when tomorrow can get Rm100? Unless there is a risk of default. Single tier system already in place many years back. Old imputation dividend system is going to be obsolete next year. In other word, start next year, all dividend is under single tier. Those tax credit under old imputation system will be obsoleted. |
|
|
Nov 2 2013, 12:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,001 posts Joined: May 2013 |
|
|
|
Nov 2 2013, 03:48 PM
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(topearn @ Oct 31 2013, 12:08 PM) Agree. Bank deposits (up to a certain limit, probably RM100,000) guarantee by a company call PIDM which is owned by the government while this sukuk is guarantee by government...same iron-clad guarantee...both by govt....so your principal it's perfectly safe. PIDM is Rm250K.PIDM is government agency that run an insurance scheme whereby banks do pay insurance premium in order depositor holders get RM250k guaranteed protection from the insurance. While sukuk guaranteed by gov, is a bond that guaranteed by gov without any insurance scheme in place like PIDM. So their structure is different, although both are tightly related to gov. Bank deposit safe or not, has 2 layer protection. 1. First layer protection. The bank financial sound, and has adequate capital to meet the liabilities, then your deposit is safe, disregard the PIDM or gov defaulting. As even gov default their bond, if bank is financial sound, your deposit is still safe. 2. Second layer,PIDM protection only need to be activated if the bank defaulted. For, sukuk/bond 1. Ability of issuing company to repay. 2. Gov fulfill the obligation of guarantee (if it is guaranteed by gov) So both have distinct difference. As you can have a scenario that gov defaulted, while bank still sound, means deposit still safe. While if gov has financial problem, the those bond guaranteed by gov, may have a risk being defaulted, if can't be redeemed by the issuing company. Gov can default, if financial situation really turn really really bad time. So I do not think, it is a right word to use "perfect safe" instrument even though it is gov owed/guaranteed. Although it is unlikely to happen is most of time. there were a few gov did default before. Also I do not think it is right to group together FD and Sukuk/bond guaranteed by gov, they do have distinct difference. Yes, the sukuk is quite safe, but cannot say it is as safe as FD or same as FD. They are different. This post has been edited by cherroy: Nov 2 2013, 03:52 PM |
|
|
Nov 2 2013, 04:11 PM
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(jack~daniel @ Nov 2 2013, 11:25 AM) Every 6 months, you get payment for the interest, disregard bond market price out there for the bond. Whether one able to make a profit from the bond or not, it depends on the market price then. A bond IPO at Rm1.00, can be traded at Rm1.02 or Rm0.98 as well, largely depends on interest rate environment out there. |
|
|
Nov 4 2013, 05:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Oct 2013 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Nov 2 2013, 03:48 PM) PIDM is Rm250K. Thank for sharing!!! PIDM is government agency that run an insurance scheme whereby banks do pay insurance premium in order depositor holders get RM250k guaranteed protection from the insurance. While sukuk guaranteed by gov, is a bond that guaranteed by gov without any insurance scheme in place like PIDM. So their structure is different, although both are tightly related to gov. Bank deposit safe or not, has 2 layer protection. 1. First layer protection. The bank financial sound, and has adequate capital to meet the liabilities, then your deposit is safe, disregard the PIDM or gov defaulting. As even gov default their bond, if bank is financial sound, your deposit is still safe. 2. Second layer,PIDM protection only need to be activated if the bank defaulted. For, sukuk/bond 1. Ability of issuing company to repay. 2. Gov fulfill the obligation of guarantee (if it is guaranteed by gov) So both have distinct difference. As you can have a scenario that gov defaulted, while bank still sound, means deposit still safe. While if gov has financial problem, the those bond guaranteed by gov, may have a risk being defaulted, if can't be redeemed by the issuing company. Gov can default, if financial situation really turn really really bad time. So I do not think, it is a right word to use "perfect safe" instrument even though it is gov owed/guaranteed. Although it is unlikely to happen is most of time. there were a few gov did default before. Also I do not think it is right to group together FD and Sukuk/bond guaranteed by gov, they do have distinct difference. Yes, the sukuk is quite safe, but cannot say it is as safe as FD or same as FD. They are different. have you buy any? worth? |
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 06:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,001 posts Joined: May 2013 |
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 06:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,142 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Sin City |
still got 1 week more for those interested
|
| Change to: | 0.0284sec
0.64
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:10 AM |